AirCavBob wrote:Hell, I'll take one. PM me payment details plz

Yeah, what he said...

AAC make bad ass cans.


And they got cool shirts, too.

Major, you make my privates stand at attention!

Yeah, they went to the source of the problem instead of asking an intermediary to silence them. Ian was trying to damage AAC's credibility maliciously, if someone did that to do me and wouldn't support their argument with facts nor stop when asked politely i'd sue em; and I generally hate the idea ...

They protect their paying sponsors. So if another silencer company who is buying ads there asks them to delete a post, they probably will. Didn't you guys sue Ian for making "bullshit" accusations? Pot, meet kettle. Yeah, they went to the source of the problem instead of asking an interme...

silencertalk wrote:They protect their paying sponsors. So if another silencer company who is buying ads there asks them to delete a post, they probably will.

Didn't you guys sue Ian for making "bullshit" accusations? Pot, meet kettle.

Bowen1911 wrote:Oh s--t I started a fucking hurricane...

You're just doing what kids do...can't blame you anymore than you can blame a dog for being a dog.

Actually, they are not about anything but the money- you'll notice in every section of the forum, the majority of companies that get discussed are site sponsors. It is really anything but an open conversation on anything. You can weed around and find a bit of helpful information, but it's generally...

You are being intentionally stupid. The ee rules are easy to follow. Every once in a while someone will start a bitch thread in gd about their thread being locked but I cannot recall an instance where it was anything but their inability to follow directions that caused it. I've been on the site sin...

Wow. Is there anyway I can find the owner of the site and slap across the face for being a bitch? you could, but you'd get your scrawny little ass kicked immediately following. I have no dog in this fight, I frequently recommend the m42k, and other aac products, over there with no backlash what-so-...

My piston ARs get just as dirty as the DI ARs when running suppressors. That's been my experience also. I noticed slightly less blowback in the piston version, but not enough to make me switch...the majority of filth and blowback comes through the chamber when the bolt is unlocked and the BCG is he...

I'll probably be there, as long as I'm not out of state working.

I live in south Nashville, bordering Antioch. It's not the hood, that would be East Nashville. Can it be a little rough at times? Sure, I guess...but nothing like where you're coming from. Far as actual gunshops go, I don't go to any around here.... prices are all a bit high.

And here's the truly hilarious part..... Y'all are SIMULTANEOUSLY arguing the majority of the carbon crap comes thru the chamber, AND regulating the gas tube cuts down on carbon fouling. Hey...genius.... wouldn't that tell you the majority of the crap is coming THRU THE GAS TUBE? Since BOTH guns ha...

jesus christ on a pogo stick with a kool-aid smile... I don't know why I even bother sometimes.

Diomed wrote:

WhiteBuffalo wrote:You're right, the vast majority of filth, when running surpressed, is due to blowback exiting through the chamber. I tend to not give folks credability when they say otherwise.

Maybe some kind of bore evacuator is needed?

not a bad idea at all... hmmm

I don't for a second believe that the amount of crap that comes back through the gas tube comes close to what comes back through the barrel in the form of blowback when using a suppressor.[/b] You're right, the vast majority of filth, when running surpressed, is due to blowback exiting through the ...

Up until ~20 years ago body armor was not used. Silencers are next in line. Hence Remington now owning ya'll? What the military needs is a weapon system that is designed from the ground up to run suppressed and unsuppressed. It's nice to see some manufacturers embracing this (Noveske's switch block...

Mike did a cut/thread/pin job on my BCM middy upper. It took awhile, and during the wait, I had a personal problem arise. Mike did more than make up for the backlog... I won't say how, just rest assured, he's one hell of a guy....that Goldie is a sweety too! I WILL be doing business with TT again. T...

rob_s wrote:The movie was phenomenal. The fact that this lot doesn't like it is only further evidence of same.

Agreed.

Maser wrote:I was talking about the book. Tom Hanks is a horriblr actor! Although Big was a funny movie.

Kids today

Maser wrote:No, the book sucked! Polar Express was a much better preschool book. I really liked it during Christmas time.

That movie made me want to punch Tom Hanks in the mouth and he's one of my all time favorite actors.

Maser wrote:I remember that lame ass book when I was in preschool. No surprise the movie is worse.

I bet you do, it was only a handful of years ago.

The book was rad, the movie was rad.

.... why the F--k do you all keep going back over there? Is it because ya'll suck, too? Do you mean you ALL or YOU all ? Get your tenses right. "Ya'll" is singular. "All ya'll" is plural. BTW, it'll take a lot more than this inanity to get banned on ST. I'm just talkin about a h...

This is reallty funny, if they ban you and someone asked how to contact you, they get in trouble for asking: Anbody Know How To Contact SC-Texas? texjames Team Member Joined: Jul 2009 TX, USA Member Posts: 611 Today 10:14:40 PM CDTI have tryed searching and even another thread the Mods did not like...