Search found 6 matches

by Hauser
Fri Sep 25, 2015 3:41 pm
Forum: Silencer Talk
Topic: Silencer Inc. < New kid on the block
Replies: 30
Views: 6848

Re: Silencer Inc. < New kid on the block

I must say, I like the rather utilitarian look. How do they sound? Specifically, the .30?
by Hauser
Wed Sep 16, 2015 9:11 am
Forum: Silencer Talk
Topic: Silencerco's Maxim Vice Event Pictures! Check in!
Replies: 30
Views: 4932

Re: Silencerco's Maxim Vice Event Pictures! Check in!

Do you recall SiCo specifically stating the Hybrid is GTG up to .338L? A few other attendees or at least the posts are reporting .458SOCOM/45-70Gv't. By the way, thanks for taking the time to attend and to report back. Your reviews are instrumental to a lot of our decision making.
by Hauser
Tue Sep 15, 2015 10:08 am
Forum: Silencer Talk
Topic: Silencerco's Maxim Vice Event Pictures! Check in!
Replies: 30
Views: 4932

Re: Silencerco's Maxim Vice Event Pictures! Check in!

Anxiously waiting to see what SiCo's got up their sleeves.
by Hauser
Wed Sep 09, 2015 10:00 am
Forum: Silencer Reviews
Topic: Rugged Suppressors Surge 762 Review
Replies: 8
Views: 7495

Re: Rugged Suppressors Surge 762 Review

Great review! Your channel is easily my favorite of all the Full30 family, due in no small part to the very high production quality. Your channel is just more professional than the others.
by Hauser
Fri May 15, 2015 9:22 am
Forum: Silencer Talk
Topic: Coyote Problem
Replies: 47
Views: 6431

Re: Coyote Problem

You will NOT be disappointed with the Octane on a Mark 23. Mine's still in jail, but I had a conjugal visit last weekend and was amazed.
by Hauser
Fri Jun 27, 2014 3:18 pm
Forum: Silencer Talk
Topic: Sig suspends muzzle brake lawsuit vs ATF
Replies: 14
Views: 3158

Re: Sig suspends muzzle brake lawsuit vs ATF

So let's say the ATF issues a new ruling that is favorable to Sig. Are we also saying that since the Courts stayed out of the decision, that the ATF could issue a ruling that gives unfair trade advantage to one company, but deprives other companies not covered under the ruling? It sounds like that's...