Search found 1864 matches
- Mon Sep 14, 2020 11:24 am
- Forum: Silencersmithing Forum
- Topic: I give up
- Replies: 5
- Views: 1219
Re: I give up
Pro tip: if you're finding yourself typing long passages only to lose them for some reason when submitting the text in a forum, try typing into Notepad or some word proeccor software first. From that program you can then copy the text into a browser window and try sending it If it fails, you still ...
- Fri Aug 07, 2020 7:16 am
- Forum: Silencersmithing Forum
- Topic: Need To Critique This Design
- Replies: 8
- Views: 1328
Re: Need To Critique This Design
I agree w/ the Capt. Also, I wouldn't cut the blast spacer as you have. Ports near the distal side, to vent into the coaxial volume, would be more adequate and help protect the outer tube. Try to incorporate indexing clips, to help align the baffle clipping and coaxial vanes. Personally, I'd increas...
- Tue Aug 04, 2020 8:17 pm
- Forum: Silencersmithing Forum
- Topic: Second e-Form1 Finger prints
- Replies: 1
- Views: 592
- Mon Aug 03, 2020 3:57 pm
- Forum: Silencersmithing Forum
- Topic: R8 my 3D printed Form1 design
- Replies: 7
- Views: 1035
Re: R8 my 3D printed Form1 design
I'd say you're right. I'm just wiped at the exit, not throughout.Capt. Link. wrote: ↑Mon Aug 03, 2020 3:52 pmI'm guessing your can is a hybrid design that features baffles w/ a end wipe and not built like the WOX-1's stack ?
-CL
- Sun Aug 02, 2020 8:31 am
- Forum: Silencersmithing Forum
- Topic: R8 my 3D printed Form1 design
- Replies: 7
- Views: 1035
Re: R8 my 3D printed Form1 design
I can't agree with this part.Capt. Link. wrote: ↑Sat Aug 01, 2020 11:45 amWipes cause much inaccuracy plus you will need a FFL to replace them.
My 4.5" AR15/22, can hit 3.5" swingers @100yds, from a wiped can.
Also, the end user can legally replace wipes. ATF has never reversed this decision.
- Fri Jul 31, 2020 7:23 am
- Forum: Silencersmithing Forum
- Topic: R8 my 3D printed Form1 design
- Replies: 7
- Views: 1035
Re: R8 my 3D printed Form1 design
Why build something that's easily machined? Why are you using plastics? Need to be overly thick, wasting crucial volume. Always clip baffles. IMHO, it's a waste of a stamp. You're not doing anything that hasn't been done, it won't be an optimal design for 22lr, and it won't last as long as tradition...
- Tue Jul 28, 2020 7:39 am
- Forum: Silencersmithing Forum
- Topic: Advice plz: 5.56 end cap hole size, engraving location
- Replies: 11
- Views: 1134
Re: Advice plz: 5.56 end cap hole size, engraving location
A Chinese, Aluminum, monocore is a horrible choice, horrible. Regardless of your first go'round, don't do it. Exit bore relies on design, but stay >.080in over caliber. You can engrave whatever you want. Some do endcap, some the mount, most do the tube. Placement on tube near midle or closer to mou...
- Wed Jul 22, 2020 10:57 pm
- Forum: Silencersmithing Forum
- Topic: 8" .308 SS316 build
- Replies: 1
- Views: 792
Re: 8" .308 SS316 build
K's are typically for low pressure rounds.
Go with 60* cones and don't look back.
Go with 60* cones and don't look back.
- Tue Jul 21, 2020 7:26 am
- Forum: Silencersmithing Forum
- Topic: .22 rimfire, integral vs add-a-can
- Replies: 14
- Views: 1674
Re: .22 rimfire, integral vs add-a-can
If you're going to do a 10/22, just do a really good muzzle can, that you could swap between hosts. The action of the 10/22 doesn't let you get to hollywood quiet. If you wanted to do a bolt gun, go integral, all day long. My integral 22 is a Savage MKII w/ an ~8" monocore. It falls into the stupid ...
- Fri Jul 17, 2020 7:39 am
- Forum: Silencersmithing Forum
- Topic: What would cause inaccuracy when hot?
- Replies: 13
- Views: 1029
Re: What would cause inaccuracy when hot?
I'd say that was more luck than anything. I would never go less than .040" diametral clearance, usually run .050"-.060". No suppression is gained by going tighter, just the potential for issues like the OP's. I didn't chose that bore arbitrarily, it was a decision based on previous results. If deal...
- Thu Jul 16, 2020 2:37 pm
- Forum: Silencersmithing Forum
- Topic: What would cause inaccuracy when hot?
- Replies: 13
- Views: 1029
Re: What would cause inaccuracy when hot?
Not sure of OP's design, but I've done 9mm K's (what the OP is using) w/ a bore of ~.386. That's only 16thou clearance, per side. No issues w/ accuracy and marginal POI shift.
- Thu Jul 16, 2020 9:48 am
- Forum: Silencersmithing Forum
- Topic: Qb 22 kit with mouse holes
- Replies: 2
- Views: 712
Re: Qb 22 kit with mouse holes
mouseholes are ancient tech and not req'd.
- Thu Jul 09, 2020 8:29 am
- Forum: Silencersmithing Forum
- Topic: .308, 18" barel uncorking pressure,
- Replies: 2
- Views: 469
Re: .308, 18" barel uncorking pressure,
Your numbers are a bit off, but not terribly. Barrel length needs to have the "chamber" subtracted. Use cartridge overall length, minus bullet length, and subtract this from barrel length. Use that as bore volume. Use QL's "Useable Case Capacity" as your constant for pMax (62kpsi) volume. Also, your...
- Thu Jul 09, 2020 8:19 am
- Forum: Silencersmithing Forum
- Topic: on form 1: 7.62 or 30 cal
- Replies: 6
- Views: 1217
- Thu Jul 09, 2020 8:16 am
- Forum: Silencersmithing Forum
- Topic: Advice plz: 5.56 end cap hole size, engraving location
- Replies: 11
- Views: 1134
Re: Advice plz: 5.56 end cap hole size, engraving location
A Chinese, Aluminum, monocore is a horrible choice, horrible. Regardless of your first go'round, don't do it. Exit bore relies on design, but stay >.080in over caliber. You can engrave whatever you want. Some do endcap, some the mount, most do the tube. Placement on tube near midle or closer to moun...
- Wed Jul 01, 2020 2:42 pm
- Forum: Silencersmithing Forum
- Topic: Form 1 maker
- Replies: 1
- Views: 423
- Tue Jun 23, 2020 7:26 am
- Forum: Silencersmithing Forum
- Topic: Welding endcaps
- Replies: 9
- Views: 1006
Re: Welding endcaps
You don't usually bevel thin walled tube, it's just butt welded. But, stick welding w/ an oversized rod, a bevel on both pieces (#3) should do. You can turn afterwards, to remove the buildup.
- Mon Jun 22, 2020 7:44 am
- Forum: Silencersmithing Forum
- Topic: What Is Maximum PSI In .22 Rimfire Can?
- Replies: 5
- Views: 551
Re: What Is Maximum PSI In .22 Rimfire Can?
As Ecco pointed out, the volume of the system (chamber, barrel, suppressor) is exponentially greater than the chamber itself. Suppressors aren't sealed vessels and don't warrant the same engineering/design.
- Sat Jun 20, 2020 2:44 pm
- Forum: Silencersmithing Forum
- Topic: Form 1 Maker when is it officially made?
- Replies: 10
- Views: 908
Re: Form 1 Maker when is it officially made?
Well, sort of. Technically, it's a silencer as soon as you bore the end cap and assemble that onto the tube. But that doesn't mean it's illegal for the F1 maker to manufacture the rest of the parts. Exactly, a tube with a bored cap would meet the definition. I didn't say it would be illegal to make...
- Fri Jun 19, 2020 1:28 pm
- Forum: Nutcase bitch and whine forum
- Topic: What we should do about the riots
- Replies: 18
- Views: 2136
Re: What we should do about the riots
If we bring our guns out, not to shoot looters, not to kill cops, but as a show of force in the defense of liberty, if we behave as strong, free, dignified men, gently and empathetically but with terrible power held in check by our own calm, the conversation will be FORCED to shift to something mor...
- Fri Jun 19, 2020 7:59 am
- Forum: Silencersmithing Forum
- Topic: Form 1 Maker when is it officially made?
- Replies: 10
- Views: 908
Re: Form 1 Maker when is it officially made?
I had a long reply for you, all typed out, and the site ate it. You get the amended version. What you're asking/thinking about would be illegal. It's a silencer when it meets the definition, not when you say so. A Form1 maker can legally repair their own silencer/property, regardless of original mak...
- Fri Jun 19, 2020 7:29 am
- Forum: Silencersmithing Forum
- Topic: Serial number on silencer
- Replies: 20
- Views: 2651
Re: Serial number on silencer
While you can, you need to be careful not to damage the tube wall. A close fitting mandrel should be used.
- Tue Jun 16, 2020 7:27 am
- Forum: Silencersmithing Forum
- Topic: Form 1 design for an FN1900 in .32 ACP
- Replies: 10
- Views: 691
Re: Form 1 design for an FN1900 in .32 ACP
1.25x6 should be plenty
No need for any o-rings
I prefer not to space baffles near projectile diameter.
See how many cones you can get in a 6" tube @ ~.375in
No need for any o-rings
I prefer not to space baffles near projectile diameter.
See how many cones you can get in a 6" tube @ ~.375in
- Sun Jun 14, 2020 2:47 pm
- Forum: Silencersmithing Forum
- Topic: Form 1 design for an FN1900 in .32 ACP
- Replies: 10
- Views: 691
Re: Form 1 design for an FN1900 in .32 ACP
A lot of your design features are ancient. Drop the perforated blast baffle. A single port is all that's needed. Ditch the mousehole (the cut at the cone's base). As said, blast spacer is huge. I'd probably put the first baffle 1/4" from muzzle. Personally, 'd just fill the volume with cones, but K'...
- Tue May 26, 2020 12:05 pm
- Forum: Silencersmithing Forum
- Topic: tons of junk coming from suppressor into pistol action
- Replies: 8
- Views: 521
Re: tons of junk coming from suppressor into pistol action
The spring in your gun, not the booster. The booster spring works in conjunction w/ the suppressor weight. The pistol's recoil spring will delay the action's unlock time.
I was interested in pics for, above all things, an idea of baffle geometry and their direct impact w/ back pressure.
I was interested in pics for, above all things, an idea of baffle geometry and their direct impact w/ back pressure.