I'd rather spend $35-45 with Bill than buy most any after market trigger A lot of people let that moron ruin their parts. :shock: Has this dick smooch figured out that the part are surface hardened yet? Or is he still just destroying the hardness properties and taking money from Fucktards. :lol:

Capt. Link. wrote: Your weapon will be FA only with it

Deal Breaker!

Send them a Christmas card, lunatic.

I've never thought of stalking an examiner...

That ping cost me 12 fire fights in NAM!!

We even test fired a 762SDN on an M4-1000 18T mount.

Hatchetjoe wrote:I think they are a solution looking for a problem.

They are a solution that is FULL OF PROBLEMS.

Bendersquint wrote: I have been down range when supersonic has been fired within 10 feet and it didn't sound like the Hollywood noise.

I've been down range about 45 degrees from the bullet path... 30 feet away... and an AR15 is painful to the ears.

A can "in stock" is worth TEN that can be ordered. If you plan to order a can and hope to have it by 2nd qtr of next year... be ready for disappointment.

This retarded s--t got LOCKED over on M4 Carbean. All I had to do was read the Title... then look over to the lock symbol next to it. Never even openned the nonsense up.

I wouldn't TOUCH the port until test firing it. If it runs now, it's likely to be about right with a shorter dwell and the added pressure of the suppressor.

Unless you're involved in criminal activity or your weapon is at a dealer/ffl/SOT during an ATF audit... NO ONE will ever care.

Firing a suppressed AR in a structure is about as loud as shooting a 9mm pistol out in the open with no ear pro on.... it IS LOUD for sure. I did this a few weeks ago in a structure with no windows or doors in place... i.e. the structure was somewhat open. I fired a single shot to get a taste, and W...

Piston garbage is infinitely more problematic. Sounds like the issue may indeed be a buffer selection solution. Just because these ignorant monkies don't know what they're doing doesn't mean the Colt guns weren't right. The Colt MK18 style guns are not sold so easily by Specialized Armament for this...

continuity wrote: It sucks though, when a nice shooting rifle no longer works with the ammo of choice.

Yeah... A cut down barrel is going to have completely different harmonics and require load work up from scratch.

We shoot all of the bullets through suppresors. VLDs are depth sensitive. They can be squirrelly if seated at the wrong distance off the lands. VLDs have a secant ogive... SMKs have a tangent ogive. SMKs will self align better and are not depth sensitive. But they have a lower Ballistic Coefficient.

AGP arms here in Tempe has nice marked lowers without the fagtard Spikes like logo.

Oops... I found my pic and they're marked like this...

Get you one of those hose clamps and put it on the end of that musical instrument.

Or... wrap the mofo in duct tape.

smitty wrote: MarkM, which AAC mounts are you talking about?

On my buddy's 308 and 300WM 5R bolt guns... he just runs the AAC 51t mounts. The 2 chamber AAC brake is actually pretty good and taming the 300WM. It's less obnoxious than a Holland brake, but still really effective.

jaredr wrote:who cares what it looks like inside as long as it performs?

I do, evidently.

I'm thinking of complaining about this to the NAACP!

Yeah... there you go. Silencerco Saker.

That's ugly.

That silencer company that made the backwards compatible AAC mountable can did the staggered tine lengths to eliminate their ping.

I forget their company name. But I saw a video from SHOT show.

There's a guy on M4carbean that posted the same video using your username. I'd kick his ass!

Is there an "app" for that?

be cool, water your lawn... thats a fire hazard! That's like 5 years ago... in the winter. The grass is green in the summer. :lol: I also get a kick out of the old AAC ads in my 10 year old gun rags I come across from time to time. I plan to FORCE those gayz to honor the M4-2000 advertised price so...