Not for the 92s.

People who have them seem to really like them. Especially for the money, it definitely seems like a very good choice as far as build quality, features (all those of the original 92), and functional reliabiliy. The problem is getting them from a dealer. You can order them directly from Ciener, but it...

It is my understanding that while the '92s can be made to work without recoil-assisting devices, potential reliability still suffers. It will always just be that much closer to a FTEject or a FTFeed, so a relatively weak grip on a particular shot or an otherwise insignificant amount of dust or gunk ...

AAh okay gotcha, I'll definitely sign up then! I just wanted to make sure I know what I was getting .

So, on the Premium page, there are more than the 10 reviews shown without the subscription? Or are you saying those are whats worth the money? Just for clarification.

Am I missing something on that site? Do they not show all the reviews they've done without the premium subscription? It's not that I wouldn't mind paying the fee. I don't even see any 9mm tests since least year, but I keep hearing about tests they did for the new Evo 9 and the TiRant? It's not that ...

1) Can suppressors that are small enough to use the stock sights (Taurus PT92, 1" diameter at the largest) still be effective at suppression? 2) How much POI shift or general inaccuracy would I be looking at with a suppressor? I enjoy longer shooting, and can consistently hit a 12x24" plat...