Sig may be trying to compete with Glock, but they dont stand a chance. Anyway, here is a pic of mine. Just 100 rounds through this pistol to date. http://i329.photobucket.com/albums/l389/badcatbigbat/DSC_0454.jpg The grip angle does take a little bit to get used to after shooting Glocks for so long.

Either way, i must have a few.

From closest distance first, I will start off with my Emerson knife, Glock 19, Mossberg 500A/Uzi 9 mm (full auto), M-4 carbine all the way up to Remington 700 in 300 win mag. I think that should cover most spectrums.

mooster1223 wrote:The RO on the pistol stage needs to carry some more keys

He is really a little lite on the keys. We carry much more than that while working. I say an average of 5lbs of keys.

Here is my CCW 45. I mostly carry my Glock 19 or Kel-tec 3AT

I am very pleased with my Kimber Tactical Custom II. Here is a pic of it and a well worn passport.

This lady is a office worker and she shoot better than some of the guys. Yes, she is shooting in a pants suit and heels, and dropped a couple rounds. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PhfhYaQEf7o And this is not an angel (just me) shooting the same course http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MYKY2zgi4do &...

fine pics, but (no pun intented) I would love to see the unedited version. You can tell that they were inhanced a little, but not that much.

+1

and it is a real product, lamo!

so true

I know that AP and Foxnews are trying to dis-glorify the bombers by not calling them suicide bombers, but this term is stupid. Every bomber who kills people is a homicide bomber. If they kill themselves on purpose, they are a suicide bomber. Period. The real term would be "Murder-Suicide Bombe...

They are most likely police cadets or at the very least ICDC. Yes it's real.

If you're going to do a comparison of the two cans at night and have any semblance of scientific merit they should be filmed under the same conditions with the same camera. Any number of camera settings or attributes could contribute to different results. Just my $0.02 This is for your 2 cents. Go ...

I have the same set up. No, you can not use your sights fully. However, I can still use the sights to the effect that after I acquire the target, I then align the sights. In effect you will see your rear/front sight-suppressor-target.

now that's f'ed up!!!

If you're going to do a comparison of the two cans at night and have any semblance of scientific merit they should be filmed under the same conditions with the same camera. Any number of camera settings or attributes could contribute to different results. Just my $0.02 This is for your 2 cents. Go ...

M16MANIAC wrote:No flash at all with the can on, even on the first shot.
What make and model?

I was shooting my Walter P22 with a Gemtech OutbackII.

Just watched the video. If I saw that at night, I would think that some poor sucker was trying to light a cigarette. Then I'd shoot at them. Here you go. The camera was placed to my 2 O' clock at about 5 yards away. Just for comparison, I shinned my low battery powered TLR-1 light, flicked a lighte...

Can you shine some more light on that, lol.

"air of elitism" hmmm. :idea: Produce better results :!: I meant from the forum members here. Like since you bought something different, they can talk down to you, like you can't go buy another one. But I would like to see some AAC Products from in front of the muzzle, 10 yards in front, ...

If you really want to see what we do at dark use night vision. Every single shot you make, no matter what brand can, is going to look like a photo flash. Thats why hadj sucks at night. Here's my point. I did not want to use night vision as that has been done before. Yes, you will see the smallest h...

If you really want to see what we do at dark use night vision. Every single shot you make, no matter what brand can, is going to look like a photo flash. Thats why hadj sucks at night. Here's my point. I did not want to use night vision as that has been done before. Yes, you will see the smallest h...