If only I was anywhere near that good.

The new SR22s are availble with threaded bbl, much like the P22 with the protector on the end. Saw one today, the cat # is SR22PBT.

I'll take this, how do you take payment?

Most likely it will hold up, except maybe the threads, I don't think performance will be optimal however.

Enfield577 wrote:

Must show internals

What he said!

Wow if any more learning happens to me my head may explode from too much knowledge. Let's go back to talking about the massage!

[/quote]


"Who the hell cut off the steel tubular leg from the Bang & Olufsen audio component stand ?"

.[/quote]

That act could be a death senetence.

Steve S wrote:I like my AWC Mk-9. Very quiet.
Steve

Ditto, I've had mine since the 80s.

"A PPK/S barrel is longer than that of PPK. Thus you thread it, remove the original PPK barrel, and replace." Are you sure? Maybe you mean a PP bbl is linger than a PPK or PPK/s? Been there done that. Yes. Otherwise Interarms gave a PPK/S barrel in 1978 some viagra. :) :) I guess I have t...

"A PPK/S barrel is longer than that of PPK. Thus you
thread it, remove the original PPK barrel, and replace."



Are you sure?
Maybe you mean a PP bbl is linger than a PPK or PPK/s?
Been there done that.

How about just buying a MKIII grip frame and installing it under a MKII upper and maybe then replacing the magazine safety with a bushing?

I think they are a solution looking for a problem.

Pfiffikus25, Good start, the baffles look a little thick walled. this will eat up some volume, I'm no sure about tube Id but here tubes are .870" or .875" ID, that will tale some volume also. The orings in front are mostly to keep the front cap from unscrewing. All the sealing should be ac...

Like Lava Red said, he's gotten down to 1/32" in AL so in stainless you could thorethically get a little thinner, the tradeoff will come when you chuck it and it goes out of round, of not saying you are not careful but my first couple of attempts with thin 17-4 went flying because I was afraid ...

Why the spacer? It will increase the blast chamber and likely increase FRP.

Outstanding concept and excecution.

Woa that would end up with a three inch blast chamber. Usually that translates to FRP, but with this arrangement I have no reference as most pistol powders should be all burned up. Does anyone have any info to contribute here?

Worse than no link at all.

This Idea was posted on here before, sans the exterior tube. Not sure what the title was so I could not find it for reference.

On the feeding issue someone mentioned that if you use the standard .45ACP adapter you would then use 1911 9MM magazines to resolve the feed problem. I'm not sure how accurate this statement is. Does anyone have an answer for this?

Are you planning to stay with a round concentric design, or are you looking to explore other directions?

delta9mda wrote:

greytamer wrote:Just measured my element and it was .235". Hope that helps everyone

paul owned again

and again and again

seems like a recurring theme

Just intellectual curiosity on this one. Thinking away from the common designs is all.

http://www.trident-enterprises.com/el%20cheapo.png I had a few thoughts in the box so to speak and came up with something really inexpensive to make. I was wondering if this had been done before? The tube would be 1" aluminum and the "Baffles" just some bent stainless sheet stock. Th...