I have had the stamps on hand for a while but life has been in the way. Plus my band new 6 jaw chuck has come in (needs mounting but hey its here)
The rifles the suppressor will need to go on:
SBR 6.5" BlackOut Ar15 Mostly supersonic, some subsonic.
20" 6.5 Grendal AR15
SBR 12.5" 308 AR10
18" 308 AR10
And periodically 5.56 AR15
The Stamp:
max of 10.75" (longer than I plan)
Construction:
Blast baffle: Iconel
The cones: What grade stainless? Or should I go Titanium? If titanium what grade? I have never cut titanium, but I have heard from a machinist buddy its a bitch and you have to turn and burn it. I have also read the opposite.
The tube:
Diameter 1.625 outside.
Materiel: Stainless but what grade? Where to buy?
The tools:
Logan 12" lathe converted to CNC
4 axis mill converted to CNC
Bender, if I go titanium tips on turning
material selection assistance
- Bendersquint
- Industry Professional
- Posts: 11357
- Joined: Sat Jan 07, 2006 7:19 pm
- Location: North Carolina
- Contact:
Re: material selection assistance
You know my suggestion is titanium.
Grade9 for tubing and Grade5 for baffles.
Grade9 for tubing and Grade5 for baffles.
Re: material selection assistance
Yes but you have experience cutting it. I dont...Bendersquint wrote:You know my suggestion is titanium.
Grade9 for tubing and Grade5 for baffles.
Last edited by vz58 on Sun Mar 17, 2013 4:23 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Re: material selection assistance
316 or 17-4 for stainless.
- ChimeraPrecision
- Silent But Deadly
- Posts: 622
- Joined: Wed Sep 21, 2011 11:40 am
- Location: Behind a Glock22
Re: material selection assistance
Inconel will be hell to cut.
If you have heat treat capabilities 17-4.
For ease of machining go 303/304
Extra strength could go 316
If you have heat treat capabilities 17-4.
For ease of machining go 303/304
Extra strength could go 316
Keep calm, and suppress on
Re: material selection assistance
Just want to throw this out there - I was looking at some info on heat treated 17-4. I am thinking H900 or so is the only way to go. From what I can tell, H1150 has about the same properties as Condition A (untreated.) See here:ChimeraPrecision wrote: If you have heat treat capabilities 17-4.
http://www.aksteel.com/pdf/markets_prod ... lletin.pdf
I understand that 316 readily work hardens when machining, and can therefore be more difficult to machine. Is 17-4 the same way? I don't know much about the martensitic stainless steels (like 17-4) WRT work hardening.ChimeraPrecision wrote: Extra strength could go 316
Re: material selection assistance
I have a kiln but have never used it.. I theoretically have heat treat capability. But will not count on it.
- Bendersquint
- Industry Professional
- Posts: 11357
- Joined: Sat Jan 07, 2006 7:19 pm
- Location: North Carolina
- Contact:
Re: material selection assistance
17-4 work hardens really fast! Sometimes is can catch you likeDMY wrote:Just want to throw this out there - I was looking at some info on heat treated 17-4. I am thinking H900 or so is the only way to go. From what I can tell, H1150 has about the same properties as Condition A (untreated.) See here:ChimeraPrecision wrote: If you have heat treat capabilities 17-4.
http://www.aksteel.com/pdf/markets_prod ... lletin.pdf
I understand that 316 readily work hardens when machining, and can therefore be more difficult to machine. Is 17-4 the same way? I don't know much about the martensitic stainless steels (like 17-4) WRT work hardening.ChimeraPrecision wrote: Extra strength could go 316
Re: material selection assistance
Bummer! Is it as bad as the austenitic grades?Bendersquint wrote:DMY wrote: 17-4 work hardens really fast! Sometimes is can catch you like
BTW, McMaster-Carr sells H900 and I think H1150 17-4 round bar. You'll have to cut it in it's hardened state, but that's not the end of the world.
- ChimeraPrecision
- Silent But Deadly
- Posts: 622
- Joined: Wed Sep 21, 2011 11:40 am
- Location: Behind a Glock22
Re: material selection assistance
IMHO don't cut harrened Stock. It's a pain in the ass. I've cut hard material and it is never a pleasurable experience.DMY wrote:Bummer! Is it as bad as the austenitic grades?Bendersquint wrote:DMY wrote: 17-4 work hardens really fast! Sometimes is can catch you like
BTW, McMaster-Carr sells H900 and I think H1150 17-4 round bar. You'll have to cut it in it's hardened state, but that's not the end of the world.
304 is my favorite. I don't heat treat but I can produce top notch machined products.
Keep calm, and suppress on
-
- Silent But Deadly
- Posts: 707
- Joined: Thu Apr 15, 2010 7:20 pm
- Location: The South
Re: material selection assistance
Whatever materials you pick, post up some pictures after that 12.5" .308 gives it hell.
You will find out exactly how strong your mount, spacer, baffle, material selection is on that rifle
You will find out exactly how strong your mount, spacer, baffle, material selection is on that rifle
Re: material selection assistance
316L (weldable) seems to be more common than regular 316, I believe L is worse when it comes to work hardening. It's not a huge deal if you're aware of that and act accordingly, but if unaware you can get into trouble really fast.DMY wrote:I understand that 316 readily work hardens when machining
- Shift1
- Silent But Deadly
- Posts: 556
- Joined: Mon Feb 22, 2010 8:12 pm
- Location: Lurking in the shadows of the Rocky Mountains
Re: material selection assistance
I use 316L pretty often, actually building a .308 can right now using this material for the internal components. The only issue I am currently having machining it at the moment, is trying to part the stuff off. My machine is smallish and does not do all that well with Carbide tooling.....speeds and feeds are too slow. Will at some point find the happy medium to make it all work out. Have three more baffle slugs to part off a piece of bar stock, then some spacers from tubing. This is number three using 316L for the internals.
"The Constitution shall never be construed to prevent the people of the United States who are peaceable citizens from keeping their own arms."- Samuel Adams
"LP"
"LP"