Re: Ti-Thirty Form 1
Posted: Mon Sep 01, 2014 3:06 pm
I find myself privileged to see yet another very well constructed suppressor built by our nations finest Bravo Sir!
Sound Suppressor Discussion
http://www.silencertalk.com/forum/
Yeaaaa tried to keep as much of that out the pics as possible you know just to be safe lol but thank you sirCapt. Link. wrote:I find myself privileged to see yet another very well constructed suppressor built by our nations finest Bravo Sir!
The first clue for me was "Location: florida/iraq" and I second the complement!john.t.little1 wrote:
Yeaaaa tried to keep as much of that out the pics as possible you know just to be safe lol but thank you sir
That sucks! Did you have the package insured?john.t.little1 wrote:Latest update UPS managed to damage the package my brakes were in so one was lost as with some other materials. humph
Yea I did but still could strangle someoneL1A1Rocker wrote: That sucks! Did you have the package insured?
K's excel in lower pressures, while cones(steps or smooth) excel in higher pressures.theserxtremedays wrote:If this is a ignorant question please excuse it but would this design be better in perfomance for a .30 caliber suppressor? The deeper into this forum I dig looking for answers the more confused on some aspects I get. I was looking at the K baffle and how the it allowed some gas to flow past and through the next baffle which seemed to have an advantage.
viewtopic.php?f=10&t=17116&start=125
However I then noticed that due to the higher pressure it is hard on the K baffle design and was not sure if I would be better served for longevity and suppression to use a stepped cone or a cone like used here.
Notheserxtremedays wrote:If this is a ignorant question please excuse it but would this design be better in perfomance for a .30 caliber suppressor? The deeper into this forum I dig looking for answers the more confused on some aspects I get. I was looking at the K baffle and how the it allowed some gas to flow past and through the next baffle which seemed to have an advantage.
viewtopic.php?f=10&t=17116&start=125
However I then noticed that due to the higher pressure it is hard on the K baffle design and was not sure if I would be better served for longevity and suppression to use a stepped cone or a cone like used here.
A K baffle will out perform most baffles ever made.The basic technology is responsible for some of the best baffles ever designed.They can be made to be light & strong and perform with very high pressures.Still one of the best rifle caliber baffles ever conceived.A great choice for 30 caliber though others exist.theserxtremedays wrote:If this is a ignorant question please excuse it but would this design be better in perfomance for a .30 caliber suppressor? The deeper into this forum I dig looking for answers the more confused on some aspects I get. I was looking at the K baffle and how the it allowed some gas to flow past and through the next baffle which seemed to have an advantage.
viewtopic.php?f=10&t=17116&start=125
However I then noticed that due to the higher pressure it is hard on the K baffle design and was not sure if I would be better served for longevity and suppression to use a stepped cone or a cone like used here.
Thank you Historian hopefully i will have more videos soonHistorian wrote:A heartfelt standing "O"!
Great presentation of competence, skill, and result.
Many years of happy, safe shooting.
Best.
Yeah get to itjohn.t.little1 wrote:Thank you Historian hopefully i will have more videos soonHistorian wrote:A heartfelt standing "O"!
Great presentation of competence, skill, and result.
Many years of happy, safe shooting.
Best.