7.5", 10.5", 16", or 20" Barrel effectiveness

Yes, it can be legal to make a silencer. For everything Form-1, from silencer designs that are easily made, to filing forms with the BATF, to 3D modeling. Remember, you must have an approved BATF Form-1 to make a silencer. All NFA laws apply.

Moderators: mpallett, bakerjw

Post Reply
1911rocks
Member
Posts: 46
Joined: Sun Oct 05, 2014 3:44 pm

7.5", 10.5", 16", or 20" Barrel effectiveness

Post by 1911rocks »

It stands to to my limited reason that as the barrel length increases the effectiveness of the can increases (perhaps I'm wrong). Is this universally true? How about Bolt vs. Semi-Auto? My thought is that a 24+ bbl on a Bolt Action rifle will provide the best suppression.
c5_nc
Silent But Deadly
Posts: 257
Joined: Mon Feb 18, 2013 2:00 pm

Re: 7.5", 10.5", 16", or 20" Barrel effectiveness

Post by c5_nc »

Most people that have AR-15 5.56 SBRs end up settling on 11.5-12.5", there is more decreasing return velocity increases after this. A suppressor on this length still makes for a long OVA. A 8-9" 300blk build is much better suited, subsonic loads generally have complete powder burn off in 9".
c5_nc
Silent But Deadly
Posts: 257
Joined: Mon Feb 18, 2013 2:00 pm

Re: 7.5", 10.5", 16", or 20" Barrel effectiveness

Post by c5_nc »

Most people that have AR-15 5.56 SBRs end up settling on 11.5-12.5", there is more decreasing return velocity increases after this. A suppressor on this length still makes for a long OVA. A 8-9" 300blk build is much better suited, subsonic loads generally have complete powder burn off in 9".
User avatar
Capt. Link.
Silent But Deadly
Posts: 2829
Joined: Wed Oct 17, 2007 9:05 pm
Location: USA.

Re: 7.5", 10.5", 16", or 20" Barrel effectiveness

Post by Capt. Link. »

1911rocks wrote:It stands to to my limited reason that as the barrel length increases the effectiveness of the can increases (perhaps I'm wrong). Is this universally true? How about Bolt vs. Semi-Auto? My thought is that a 24+ bbl on a Bolt Action rifle will provide the best suppression.
Its up to the baffle design if higher or lower pressure gases respond better.Many people have noticed that brand A on a pistol is more quiet than brand A on a rifle using the same ammo.Every suppressor has a velocity sweet spot.In general you are correct as barrel length lowers the gas pressure and overall SPL.
The only reason after 243 years the government now wants to disarm you is they intend to do something you would shoot them for!
http://www.silencertalk.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=10&t=79895
1911rocks
Member
Posts: 46
Joined: Sun Oct 05, 2014 3:44 pm

Re: 7.5", 10.5", 16", or 20" Barrel effectiveness

Post by 1911rocks »

I will say that the 7.5" barrel MUST have the Baffles hardened! At least the Blast Baffles and perhaps the next 3. If not they may make it through 10-20rds. I haven't tried my can on a 20+" bbl. yet.
Historian
Silent But Deadly
Posts: 3503
Joined: Mon Mar 29, 2010 10:37 pm

Re: 7.5", 10.5", 16", or 20" Barrel effectiveness

Post by Historian »

Capt. Link. wrote:
1911rocks wrote:It stands to to my limited reason that as the barrel length increases the effectiveness of the can increases (perhaps I'm wrong). Is this universally true? How about Bolt vs. Semi-Auto? My thought is that a 24+ bbl on a Bolt Action rifle will provide the best suppression.
Its up to the baffle design if higher or lower pressure gases respond better.Many people have noticed that brand A on a pistol is more quiet than brand A on a rifle using the same ammo.Every suppressor has a velocity sweet spot.In general you are correct as barrel length lowers the gas pressure and overall SPL.

Thank you again for your treat of cool mountain stream thinking and presentation on an issue.

A good example is the choices of pool cues during a game, be it 9-ball or three cushion
billiards on a 5' x 10' table. [ Where did those pockets go? Do you need BATF approval
to insert pockets that have disappeared? :) ]
User avatar
Capt. Link.
Silent But Deadly
Posts: 2829
Joined: Wed Oct 17, 2007 9:05 pm
Location: USA.

Re: 7.5", 10.5", 16", or 20" Barrel effectiveness

Post by Capt. Link. »

Historian wrote: [ Where did those pockets go? Do you need BATF approval
to insert pockets that have disappeared? :) ]
I'm waiting for the next round.I have the popcorn all ready!
1911rocks wrote:I will say that the 7.5" barrel MUST have the Baffles hardened! At least the Blast Baffles and perhaps the next 3. If not they may make it through 10-20rds. I haven't tried my can on a 20+" bbl. yet.
I'm taking for granted that you are speaking of the 5.56. The 20" tube should run much cooler and possibly more quiet.I honestly feel that less than 18" degrades the ballistics to the point that a heaver caliber should be used.At 7.5 inches the flash burn is possibly more dangerous than the bullets.humor
Last edited by Capt. Link. on Sun Oct 26, 2014 1:11 pm, edited 1 time in total.
The only reason after 243 years the government now wants to disarm you is they intend to do something you would shoot them for!
http://www.silencertalk.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=10&t=79895
User avatar
Capt. Link.
Silent But Deadly
Posts: 2829
Joined: Wed Oct 17, 2007 9:05 pm
Location: USA.

Re: 7.5", 10.5", 16", or 20" Barrel effectiveness

Post by Capt. Link. »

How much trouble have you had running a 7.5 barrel. Do you have pictures of the build.
I do agree about using a blast baffle and having it treated for wear.I wonder if some tool steels could self harden when shot...A2,W1,O1.It would save some amp-bucks.
The only reason after 243 years the government now wants to disarm you is they intend to do something you would shoot them for!
http://www.silencertalk.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=10&t=79895
1911rocks
Member
Posts: 46
Joined: Sun Oct 05, 2014 3:44 pm

Re: 7.5", 10.5", 16", or 20" Barrel effectiveness

Post by 1911rocks »

Capt Link: Well, I just threw out (2) Perforated Cone Baffles that were blown apart. Not only were they blown apart, but they went form Concave to Convex.LOL. I went with a Hardened Carbon Steel and that solved the problem.
User avatar
curtistactical
Silent But Deadly
Posts: 469
Joined: Fri Apr 25, 2014 9:22 am

Re: 7.5", 10.5", 16", or 20" Barrel effectiveness

Post by curtistactical »

Depending on the design it will be different but here are the approx. numbers for my quick attach 5.56 suppressors using 5.56 55gr ammo. 10.5"=137db., 16"=132db., 20"=129db., I have noticed past a certain point on barrel length less of difference is seen. The longer the barrel the more the powder will be burnt up and the less gas you will have to suppress. The lengths will vary depending on caliber and load. A 5.56mm is about 90% burnt up with a 20" barrel while 338 lapua is only about 55% burnt up in 20".
Joseph Jones
Curtis Tactical
07/02
Post Reply