Leidenfrost Effect for Next Generation Baffle Surfaces?

Yes, it can be legal to make a silencer. For everything Form-1, from silencer designs that are easily made, to filing forms with the BATF, to 3D modeling. Remember, you must have an approved BATF Form-1 to make a silencer. All NFA laws apply.

Moderators: mpallett, bakerjw

Post Reply
Historian
Silent But Deadly
Posts: 3503
Joined: Mon Mar 29, 2010 10:37 pm

Leidenfrost Effect for Next Generation Baffle Surfaces?

Post by Historian »

<< https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zzKgnNG ... e=youtu.be >>

Intuition precedes experiments precedes new unexpected effects.

Another example of 'fluid logic'.
magilla
New Member
Posts: 3
Joined: Tue Sep 13, 2016 8:28 am

Re: Leidenfrost Effect for Next Generation Baffle Surfaces?

Post by magilla »

wow that's deep
Hasdrubal
Member
Posts: 35
Joined: Sun Dec 27, 2015 6:50 pm

Re: Leidenfrost Effect for Next Generation Baffle Surfaces?

Post by Hasdrubal »

That's a fascinating video, but the effect comes from the phase change at the interface between the liquid and the hot surface. Won't do anything where there's nothing but gas working. Also, anything that comes from very small shapes affecting the gas flow could get clogged pretty quickly with carbon. I think this is why there haven't been any production aircraft with boundary layer suction (look up the F-16XL), the holes get clogged up and stop working. On rifle pressure silencers there might be enough flow to keep similar holes clear, but a micro grooved surface might not fare as well.
BlogSarge
Silent Operator
Posts: 85
Joined: Sun Nov 01, 2015 12:46 pm

Re: Leidenfrost Effect for Next Generation Baffle Surfaces?

Post by BlogSarge »

Now that is a cool video and a cool phenomenon.
User avatar
T-Rex
Silent But Deadly
Posts: 1865
Joined: Wed Oct 29, 2014 3:38 pm
Location: CT - The AntiConstitution State

Re: Leidenfrost Effect for Next Generation Baffle Surfaces?

Post by T-Rex »

BlogSarge wrote:Now that is a cool video and a cool phenomenon.
That's how I know my pan is hot enough to add oil then my eggs :wink:
Completed Builds www.silencertalk.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=79895
Burst Calculator www.engineersedge.com/calculators/pipe_bust_calc.htm
Silencer Porn www.instagram.com/explore/tags/silencerporn/
Historian
Silent But Deadly
Posts: 3503
Joined: Mon Mar 29, 2010 10:37 pm

Re: Leidenfrost Effect for Next Generation Baffle Surfaces?

Post by Historian »

Hasdrubal wrote:That's a fascinating video, but the effect comes from the phase change at the interface between the liquid and the hot surface. Won't do anything where there's nothing but gas working. Also, anything that comes from very small shapes affecting the gas flow could get clogged pretty quickly with carbon. I think this is why there haven't been any production aircraft with boundary layer suction (look up the F-16XL), the holes get clogged up and stop working. On rifle pressure silencers there might be enough flow to keep similar holes clear, but a micro grooved surface might not fare as well.
Excellent analysis and clear presentation!

In fluid logic gates of the 1960's cross interactions resulting
from two non similarly interacting shapes produced major
interferences.

For example the phenomenal Bang Olufsen holes in their speakers metal
covers are not just stamped straight down ... the are machined
with varying penetration angles radiating varying from the center.

Baffle/suppressor designs are an art. Improvement could come from
cross-over information of other designs.


Best.
Zombie1969
Member
Posts: 33
Joined: Tue Oct 11, 2016 6:30 pm

Re: Leidenfrost Effect for Next Generation Baffle Surfaces?

Post by Zombie1969 »

What they really need to figure out is why when I'm not paying attention my pee goes in two opposite directions none of which lands in the toilet.
User avatar
WasDustyJacket
Silent But Deadly
Posts: 1160
Joined: Tue Nov 18, 2008 5:37 pm
Location: Missouri

Re: Leidenfrost Effect for Next Generation Baffle Surfaces?

Post by WasDustyJacket »

hahahaha

I feel your pain
Shoot softly, and carry a big clip.
BlogSarge
Silent Operator
Posts: 85
Joined: Sun Nov 01, 2015 12:46 pm

Re: Leidenfrost Effect for Next Generation Baffle Surfaces?

Post by BlogSarge »

T-Rex wrote:
BlogSarge wrote:Now that is a cool video and a cool phenomenon.
That's how I know my pan is hot enough to add oil then my eggs :wink:
Well damn, no wonder my eggs stick...
Fulmen
Silent But Deadly
Posts: 1045
Joined: Wed Feb 04, 2009 6:36 am

Re: Leidenfrost Effect for Next Generation Baffle Surfaces?

Post by Fulmen »

While the physics is fascinating I fail to see how it can be applied to silencers. But as always I'd love to see someone prove me wrong.
Hasdrubal
Member
Posts: 35
Joined: Sun Dec 27, 2015 6:50 pm

Re: Leidenfrost Effect for Next Generation Baffle Surfaces?

Post by Hasdrubal »

If there's going to be a leap in silencer performance, it's probably going to come from a combination of improved CFD (computational fluid dynamics) programs and metal 3d printers. I couldn't begin to guess what the baffle shapes would be, but my feeling is that with more simple shapes like the cones and Ks, the industry has reached the point of diminishing returns. The new Ruger unit might give some hints, but that's still a part shaped so it can be cast with conventional equipment.
Fulmen
Silent But Deadly
Posts: 1045
Joined: Wed Feb 04, 2009 6:36 am

Re: Leidenfrost Effect for Next Generation Baffle Surfaces?

Post by Fulmen »

Honestly it's hard to imagine anything that would revolutionize silencer designs. While there are many distinct challenges involved the general physics is well known. The heat and fouling involved also limits both usable materials and the design.
User avatar
Fulliautomatix
Silent But Deadly
Posts: 253
Joined: Sun Sep 18, 2011 7:46 pm

Re: Leidenfrost Effect for Next Generation Baffle Surfaces?

Post by Fulliautomatix »

Fulmen wrote:Honestly it's hard to imagine anything that would revolutionize silencer designs. While there are many distinct challenges involved the general physics is well known. The heat and fouling involved also limits both usable materials and the design.
Yeah, it's all about volume. Projectile noise can be controlled by velocity, but as long as we're using burning chemicals for propulsion the current designs seem to be at their limits until Tardis-technology becomes a reality, lol, that and palm sized rail guns.
Speak softly, and carry a big stick.
Historian
Silent But Deadly
Posts: 3503
Joined: Mon Mar 29, 2010 10:37 pm

Re: Leidenfrost Effect for Next Generation Baffle Surfaces?

Post by Historian »

Fulliautomatix wrote:
Fulmen wrote:Honestly it's hard to imagine anything that would revolutionize silencer designs. While there are many distinct challenges involved the general physics is well known. The heat and fouling involved also limits both usable materials and the design.
Yeah, it's all about volume. Projectile noise can be controlled by velocity, but as long as we're using burning chemicals for propulsion the current designs seem to be at their limits until Tardis-technology becomes a reality, lol, that and palm sized rail guns.
+1

Once had a talk with Major Dick Culver USMC ( Happy Birthday, Corps ) on suppressors
which he had more than a passing knowledge of. One thought was that the simplest
.22 suppressor would be a can 1.75" x 8" filled with just flat, space, washers.
This primitive design was inspired by the dimensions of an OCONUS .45 ACP
can that was field tested.

RIP dear friend.
Historian
Silent But Deadly
Posts: 3503
Joined: Mon Mar 29, 2010 10:37 pm

Re: Leidenfrost Effect for Next Generation Baffle Surfaces?

Post by Historian »

Speaking of .45 cans, has there been one with K-baffles?

Wonder how Dick's notional 1.75" x 8" can with K-baffles
would meter.
User avatar
fishman
Silent But Deadly
Posts: 1444
Joined: Sun Dec 20, 2015 7:15 pm

Re: Leidenfrost Effect for Next Generation Baffle Surfaces?

Post by fishman »

Historian wrote:Speaking of .45 cans, has there been one with K-baffles?

Wonder how Dick's notional 1.75" x 8" can with K-baffles
would meter.
Aac tirant, which I believe has great numbers
300 blackout form 1: http://www.silencertalk.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=10&t=137293

5.56 form 1:
http://www.silencertalk.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=10&t=141800&p=955647#p955647
User avatar
T-Rex
Silent But Deadly
Posts: 1865
Joined: Wed Oct 29, 2014 3:38 pm
Location: CT - The AntiConstitution State

Re: Leidenfrost Effect for Next Generation Baffle Surfaces?

Post by T-Rex »

The DeadAir Ghost is a 45 can using K-Baffles.
Those K's are interesting as their facial wall goes in a different direction than other current designs.
Completed Builds www.silencertalk.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=79895
Burst Calculator www.engineersedge.com/calculators/pipe_bust_calc.htm
Silencer Porn www.instagram.com/explore/tags/silencerporn/
Hard_ware
Senior Silent Operator
Posts: 126
Joined: Thu Aug 29, 2013 5:56 pm
Location: South South Texas

Re: Leidenfrost Effect for Next Generation Baffle Surfaces?

Post by Hard_ware »

Fulliautomatix wrote:
Fulmen wrote:Honestly it's hard to imagine anything that would revolutionize silencer designs. While there are many distinct challenges involved the general physics is well known. The heat and fouling involved also limits both usable materials and the design.
Yeah, it's all about volume. Projectile noise can be controlled by velocity, but as long as we're using burning chemicals for propulsion the current designs seem to be at their limits until Tardis-technology becomes a reality, lol, that and palm sized rail guns.
Surface area is possible using zeolite structure* , but heat and fouling won't work with technology at hand.
*1 gram of zeolite contains on average 500 square meters surface area. Maybe the future holds carbon nano tube design, suppressors grown in the lab :shock:


Zombie1969 wrote:What they really need to figure out is why when I'm not paying attention my pee goes in two opposite directions none of which lands in the toilet.
Sounds like worn out rifling :lol:
NRA Life Member
Historian
Silent But Deadly
Posts: 3503
Joined: Mon Mar 29, 2010 10:37 pm

Re: Leidenfrost Effect for Next Generation Baffle Surfaces?

Post by Historian »

Zombie1969 wrote:What they really need to figure out is why when I'm not paying attention my pee goes in two opposite directions none of which lands in the toilet.
Reminiscent of 1940's story of a native American's visit to a psychiatrist's office
complaining of debilitating disorientation:

"Some times I feel like a teepee, other times I feel like a wigwam.
Doctor, I am in panic."

Psychiatrist smiled and assured him that there was nothing to be worried about:
"It is perfectly normal. You need to learn how to relax.
You are simply TWO TENTS."
fastfire
Silent But Deadly
Posts: 185
Joined: Fri Mar 12, 2010 9:19 pm
Location: I-D-HO

Re: Leidenfrost Effect for Next Generation Baffle Surfaces?

Post by fastfire »

Hard_ware wrote:
Fulliautomatix wrote:
Fulmen wrote:Honestly it's hard to imagine anything that would revolutionize silencer designs. While there are many distinct challenges involved the general physics is well known. The heat and fouling involved also limits both usable materials and the design.
Yeah, it's all about volume. Projectile noise can be controlled by velocity, but as long as we're using burning chemicals for propulsion the current designs seem to be at their limits until Tardis-technology becomes a reality, lol, that and palm sized rail guns.
Surface area is possible using zeolite structure* , but heat and fouling won't work with technology at hand.
*1 gram of zeolite contains on average 500 square meters surface area. Maybe the future holds carbon nano tube design, suppressors grown in the lab :shock:


Zombie1969 wrote:What they really need to figure out is why when I'm not paying attention my pee goes in two opposite directions none of which lands in the toilet.
Sounds like worn out rifling :lol:

Need a re-crowned. ouch!
User avatar
whiterussian1974
Silent But Deadly
Posts: 2857
Joined: Sat Sep 28, 2013 11:37 pm
Location: On 8th line of eye chart.

Re: Leidenfrost Effect for Next Generation Baffle Surfaces?

Post by whiterussian1974 »

If the gases were magnetized, then we could use the Tube to draw the gases off boreline and trap them longer.

Any way to add Iron-oxide to double-base smokeless powder?
The Darkest Corners of Hell are reserved for those who remain Neutral!-Dante
The Death of One is a Tragedy, a million only a statistic.-Stalin
silencertalk.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=10&t=135314
Post Reply