thread pitch

Yes, it can be legal to make a silencer. For everything Form-1, from silencer designs that are easily made, to filing forms with the BATF, to 3D modeling. Remember, you must have an approved BATF Form-1 to make a silencer. All NFA laws apply.

Moderators: mpallett, bakerjw

Post Reply
rickdavis
Member
Posts: 17
Joined: Mon Dec 31, 2007 12:32 am

thread pitch

Post by rickdavis »

Finishing up my integral 22/45. Tube is steel 1"od with .065 walls. Going with a 15/16 thread, would you use a 20 or 24 tpi? Original thought was 20 but would only leave around.020 of meat left. Wasn't sure if that was enough.
partsguy22
Senior Silent Operator
Posts: 144
Joined: Thu Feb 12, 2015 2:24 pm
Location: N. Texas

Re: thread pitch

Post by partsguy22 »

User avatar
fishman
Silent But Deadly
Posts: 1444
Joined: Sun Dec 20, 2015 7:15 pm

Re: thread pitch

Post by fishman »

I wouldn't do 15/16" x whatever. I would do whatever decimal amount gives you full thread engagement with maximized tube thickness.
300 blackout form 1: http://www.silencertalk.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=10&t=137293

5.56 form 1:
http://www.silencertalk.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=10&t=141800&p=955647#p955647
rickdavis
Member
Posts: 17
Joined: Mon Dec 31, 2007 12:32 am

Re: thread pitch

Post by rickdavis »

Hadn't thought about doing a custom thread size but that does make sense
User avatar
yondering
Silent But Deadly
Posts: 373
Joined: Thu Aug 02, 2007 11:22 am
Location: NW Wa. state

Re: thread pitch

Post by yondering »

fishman wrote:I wouldn't do 15/16" x whatever. I would do whatever decimal amount gives you full thread engagement with maximized tube thickness.
This. There's no reason to stick with a specific fractional size.

I would do 28tpi for even more remaining tube thickness; the only advantage to a coarser pitch is fewer turns to mate the parts together, it doesn't improve strength.
User avatar
T-Rex
Silent But Deadly
Posts: 1865
Joined: Wed Oct 29, 2014 3:38 pm
Location: CT - The AntiConstitution State

Re: thread pitch

Post by T-Rex »

I add 5thou (per side), to the ID, and use this as my Dmin. Keeps your B crests out of the way when sliding in baffles. I agree with 28tpi, 24 being the coarsest I'd go. You don't need a lot thread area for 22, either.
Completed Builds www.silencertalk.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=79895
Burst Calculator www.engineersedge.com/calculators/pipe_bust_calc.htm
Silencer Porn www.instagram.com/explore/tags/silencerporn/
User avatar
fishman
Silent But Deadly
Posts: 1444
Joined: Sun Dec 20, 2015 7:15 pm

Re: thread pitch

Post by fishman »

yondering wrote:
fishman wrote:I wouldn't do 15/16" x whatever. I would do whatever decimal amount gives you full thread engagement with maximized tube thickness.
This. There's no reason to stick with a specific fractional size.

I would do 28tpi for even more remaining tube thickness; the only advantage to a coarser pitch is fewer turns to mate the parts together, it doesn't improve strength.
+1
T-Rex wrote:I add 5thou (per side), to the ID, and use this as my Dmin. Keeps your B crests out of the way when sliding in baffles. I agree with 28tpi, 24 being the coarsest I'd go. You don't need a lot thread area for 22, either.
+1
300 blackout form 1: http://www.silencertalk.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=10&t=137293

5.56 form 1:
http://www.silencertalk.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=10&t=141800&p=955647#p955647
User avatar
jreinke
Silent But Deadly
Posts: 1226
Joined: Fri Jan 26, 2007 10:32 pm
Location: WI, USA
Contact:

Re: thread pitch

Post by jreinke »

I'd go with 28 tpi. So, assuming you have a lathe, and can cut internal and external threads, this is the route I would take. Using the formula TD (tap drill or tube ID) = MD (major diameter or thread size) - P (pitch of thread or 1/28), I'd fill in the information that you have. TD (.870) = MD (?) - P (.0357) or MD = TD (.870) + P (.0357), MD = .9057. So make your end caps with a .906-28 thread, then just cut the internal threads in the tube to fit the cap threads. Easy peasy!
[url=http://militarysignatures.com][img]http://militarysignatures.com/signatures/member1236.png[/img][/url]
rickdavis
Member
Posts: 17
Joined: Mon Dec 31, 2007 12:32 am

Re: thread pitch

Post by rickdavis »

Thanks for the advice. And for making it easy to understand.
User avatar
curtistactical
Silent But Deadly
Posts: 469
Joined: Fri Apr 25, 2014 9:22 am

Re: thread pitch

Post by curtistactical »

We thread all of our baffles together to make the core of our suppressors, every thread on ours utilizes 32tpi, this allows to run our wall thickness lower to keep the weight down.
Joseph Jones
Curtis Tactical
07/02
User avatar
mcmaster
Member
Posts: 18
Joined: Sun Jun 12, 2016 1:00 am

Re: thread pitch

Post by mcmaster »

Any reason not to use a square thread or acme?
Noob here just wondering.

How do HSS tool bits cut titanium anyway?

edit, I guess I just realized I have heard V threads tend to tighten up and stick under load compared to acme or square, that might be desirable?
User avatar
yondering
Silent But Deadly
Posts: 373
Joined: Thu Aug 02, 2007 11:22 am
Location: NW Wa. state

Re: thread pitch

Post by yondering »

mcmaster wrote:Any reason not to use a square thread or acme?
Noob here just wondering.
Yes, plenty of reason. 60* V threads are standard for most fasteners and other threaded connections. They're easier to cut and can use the same single point tool for a wide range of thread pitches. They're also self centering, unlike a square thread.
User avatar
fishman
Silent But Deadly
Posts: 1444
Joined: Sun Dec 20, 2015 7:15 pm

Re: thread pitch

Post by fishman »

mcmaster wrote:How do HSS tool bits cut titanium anyway?
Perfectly fine. Take a look at the link in my signature.
300 blackout form 1: http://www.silencertalk.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=10&t=137293

5.56 form 1:
http://www.silencertalk.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=10&t=141800&p=955647#p955647
Post Reply