winsor in search ☼f the silence ...baffles design&modeling..

[delta9mda]

you need to add another baffle and/ or a spacer. no reason for the blast chamber to be that big. none what so ever.

It will be interesting to see what FRP is in the new can. SWR put that space there for a reason.

less space = less frp period, end of it.

[winsor]

..


New rendering..

SF9, less frp.

[delta9mda]

thats better

[Schulze]

you need to add another baffle and/ or a spacer. no reason for the blast chamber to be that big. none what so ever.

It will be interesting to see what FRP is in the new can. SWR put that space there for a reason.

less space = less frp period, end of it.

You should call them up and let them know how to improve their design.

[82nd airborne]

Not all baffle designs are the same as far as how much blast chamber is needed, or calibers for that matter. Do you really know more than silencerco? Our aeriolo baffle (yea, thats what it looks like!) performs better, with very minimal frp if it has a comparatively long blast chamber.

[SRM]

Care to show us?

[delta9mda]

going on what is out there and if you guys take a look there is no "blast chamber" before the first baffle in the tirants, multimounts, evo etc and the ocatane doesnt perform as well so make the damn blast chamber smaller and get it done.

[winsor]

May 2012 be the year of changes.
We may see less baffles can with larger blast chamber and less frp.

like this.

[Capt. Link.]

I and a colleague have been working along the same lines more expansion space fewer baffles less FRP and back pressure.

[winsor]

.
.

From the x file.

[delta9mda]

.
.

From the x file.

but they are not done. finish em Win.

[winsor]

You got me!

[LavaRed]

Hey windsor, why don't you try making an expansion chamber at the end? . Trust me.

[winsor]

It's a doubtful piece.

[LavaRed]

It's a doubtful piece.

No, I meant at the muzzle end.

[Sergeant]

Like this?

[LavaRed]

Like this?

Yes indeed!

[Sergeant]

How does that affect the preformance Red?
Also, would you subtract the extra space needed from the blast chamber or eliminate one of the front baffles?
Steve

[winsor]

Nope, that's not SWR new Octane II alignment.

[winsor]

.


Here it is.

OT9 II with an additional blast chamber spacer.

[delta9mda]

my 2 cents, an expansion chamber at the far end wont do much. the gas is lower pressure by then. you want to keep working it some, otherwise you are wasting space.

Winsor, what is holding the baffle stack in place in the profile image? between the booster and the first baffle there is nothing holding things in place?

[LavaRed]

What this does mainly is to elevate the pitch of the sound. It also relieves pressure a but and helps focus the gases some. But the main purpose is to provide a higher tone, which as we've said before, makes the sound less gunshot-like and helps it carry less.

[winsor]

From the x file.

but they are not done. finish em Win.

After a bit modi and fancy cuts.

[winsor]

I and a colleague have been working along the same lines more expansion space fewer baffles less FRP and back pressure.

Show us some pics.

[winsor]

X -1"od 5"long can.