SilencerResearch testing the NANO !

peterlem0njello · Post by **peterlem0njello** » Sat Mar 06, 2010 8:59 am

John will be testing/metering the NANO today (weather permitting).

So look forward to the results!

2manygunz · Post by **2manygunz** » Sat Apr 03, 2010 11:17 pm

Survey says...

Artful · Post by **Artful** » Sun Apr 04, 2010 1:25 pm

no results posted so far - and he says only doing it for 9mm not any smaller calibers.

James DeGroat · Post by **James DeGroat** » Sun Apr 04, 2010 2:11 pm

Artful wrote:no results posted so far - and he says only doing it for 9mm not any smaller calibers.

Crazy thing is you guys are more informed on what he's doing with the Nano than I am.

When I sent him a Nano I ask he test it with multiple calibers since it is a true multi caliber suppressor.

I think he should at least test it with using .22lr, .380, and 9mm as these are the three calibers people want to know about.

finn · Post by **finn** » Sun Apr 04, 2010 4:35 pm

I'm not expecting too much from a can the size of a roll of tums. Hopefully it's hearing-safe though. I'm also curious how it works on a .22lr.

James DeGroat · Post by **James DeGroat** » Sun Apr 04, 2010 5:52 pm

finn wrote:I'm not expecting too much from a can the size of a roll of tums. Hopefully it's hearing-safe though. I'm also curious how it works on a .22lr.

Have you not shot yours yet?

in my testing it's hearing safe on 9mm, .380, and .22lr and it sounds really good on my P238 and is awesome on a P22.

I will try and make some new videos here soon.

finn · Post by **finn** » Sun Apr 04, 2010 5:54 pm

Nope still stuck at the dealer. Can't wait to try it out though.

James DeGroat · Post by **James DeGroat** » Sun Apr 04, 2010 5:57 pm

finn wrote:Nope still stuck at the dealer. Can't wait to try it out though.

I see, well I'm sure you will be very happy with it.

Artful · Post by **Artful** » Sun Apr 04, 2010 7:39 pm

James, Have you shipped them out already?

James DeGroat · Post by **James DeGroat** » Sun Apr 04, 2010 8:04 pm

Artful wrote:James, Have you shipped them out already?

Yes I have shipped a large batch out, but you're hasn't gone out yet as the serial number you requested was not in the first batch of tubes that were being laser engraved.

I'm hoping to ship your suppressor out along with a bunch more this coming week.

run2trouble · Post by **run2trouble** » Sun Apr 04, 2010 9:30 pm

Hope to have mine soon, prarie dogs are waiting.

goteron · Post by **goteron** » Sun Apr 04, 2010 9:54 pm

Oooh I hope mine was in that batch! James, email sent.

panaceabeachbum · Post by **panaceabeachbum** » Fri Aug 06, 2010 8:03 am

2manygunz wrote:Survey says...

http://www.silencerresearch.com/degroat ... seidon.htm

GRANDPA07 · Post by **GRANDPA07** » Fri Aug 06, 2010 12:00 pm

panaceabeachbum wrote:
2manygunz wrote:Survey says...

http://www.silencerresearch.com/degroat ... seidon.htm

Geeze, talk about rubbing salt in the wound.

Sid Post · Post by **Sid Post** » Sat Aug 28, 2010 10:15 am

I demo'ed an early Nano at the shop when I was passing through. All numbers aside, it works and works well IMHO. Does it have the best numbers? I don't really care because it works and works well. Is it quieter then my Evo-9 or Trident-9? Not likely? Is it better or worse? Depends on where and how you plan to use it.

Get the right tool for the job. It is a speciality suppressor after all.

SilencerResearch testing the NANO !

SilencerResearch testing the NANO !

Re:

Re: Re:

Re: silencerresearch testing the NANO !