Conservative cops and gun seizures

Discuss anything with like-minded people.
No posting of copyrighted material.

Moderators: mpallett, bakerjw, renegade, Hush

poikilotrm
Silent But Deadly
Posts: 3851
Joined: Tue Apr 27, 2010 12:52 pm

Conservative cops and gun seizures

Post by poikilotrm »

Your 2nd Amendment Cop Buddy Will Take Your Guns
by David Hathaway
www.lewrockwell.com/orig13/hathaway3.1.1.html

There is a lot of chatter amongst conservative "2nd Amendment cops" and military folks about how they will not obey the orders when the grand pronouncement is made to take guns. It will be a cop sit out. What will really happen is quite different. Your Republican cop or military buddy will gladly and patriotically take your guns.

Gun grabs and grabs of anything else – children, money, real estate, raw milk – don’t come down the chain of command as such. There is not an edict that comes out saying:
Obama Executive Order 666:

All federal, state, and local law enforcement officers and all active duty military personnel are hereby ordered and required to seize firearms from all persons whose only crime is non-compliance with the firearms transfer provisions contained in the Children’s and Puppies’ Omnibus Health and Safety Act of 2014. Operation Patriot Crush will commence at midnight on June 1, 2014. All will be required to participate from that date forward and to actively engage in door-to-door gun seizure operations against fellow Americans. Constitutional objections by officers will not be recognized and are hereby deemed meritless.


What really happens is that good ol’ patriotic cops are told by their bosses to show up at the police department at o dark thirty for a briefing about the execution of a search warrant. This happens hundreds of times every day. These law enforcement agencies often have military personnel and resources dedicated to assist in their mission as well. No one ever objects. There is action afoot against n’er do wells. It is based on a hush-hush deep dark sinister undercover deal. It can’t be discussed because cooperators are "in deep" and it’s all "need to know."

Fortunately, your buddy gets to be in on the action the day that the door kicking is done. It will be cool. It’s like black ops. It’s like a video game. It’s like a military adventure against the ferreted-out scum of society. It’s exciting and he gets to be there. He can meet his cop pals at Pizza Hut later on for lunch and brag about how he punched a guy who "had an attitude" and made him throw up and said, "How’d you like that home boy? Get used to that. You are going to get a lot more of that in the joint, if you’re lucky!" Before the raid, he is already getting a few comic one liners ready to go with the catchy punch lines to be thrown in later describing something like how a perp soiled himself when your cop buddy demonstrated his manhood by pointing an M4 at his forehead. These guys are scum and he has to get his licks in and deal firmly with them before those pansies in the courts get ahold of them and dismiss everything on some technicality.

On the day of the raid, there are lots of cops milling around until the master of ceremonies begins the sermon. The M.C. is someone who is praiseworthy due to rank; somebody like the Chief of Police. A general tirade slowly builds from the orator about what various scum infiltrators have done to our communities. Veiled references to politics are made. It is mentioned how "the current administration, I won’t name names" is mollycoddling the crooks and not keeping our children safe. Then a hush of silence comes over the room as the M.C. introduces the plain clothes detective, investigator, or case agent.

The detective, in a dramatic almost whispering voice, says that no details can be given to the mass of assembled cops. People are in deep. There are sensitive infiltrators inserted in the group that need their identities protected, "So we can’t talk in detail but, just let it be known that these people we are going after today are the worst. They walk amongst our families at the mall. They go to school with your kids. They are a thorn in our side." He looks over at the Chief of Police and begins a reciprocated round of suggestive head nodding, like yeah boy, I hear that. The uniformed crowd stays silent in awe of the plain clothes guy who has risen in the ranks to the point where he can sleuth together paper cases, even when no crimes are apparent, and bust down doors with another piece of paper. The detective says, "Seize computers, papers, and containers. Take cell phones and address books. Take reading material like gun magazines so we can show the judge where these people’s heads are at. Separate the subjects and get down incriminating statements. If there are any minors present, we have social services on standby to take the kids."

The detective continues, "These folks have been given the chance to work things out and they refused to cooperate. They have been approached and would not comply. They were blatantly hostile. They very likely have it in for us. They didn’t say so in so many words but, we are dealing with fringe people here folks, so assume that their intentions are hostile to be on the safe side. We have people posted watching this place and there is not a lot of movement over there. They are lying low. That is not normal. These people have something to hide. We don’t have any arrest warrants but, we may file charges depending on what we find today."

None of this is defined by the detective. This is a pre-game pep talk. Specifics will get in the way. Details are not given concerning how mama met the cops at the door one day holding her baby and said, "I do not consent to any searches" when they asked her to open the door and let them in. Why were they there? Well, that doesn’t matter for purposes of the briefing either. The family had returned a vaccination consent form to the school unsigned. The cops, responding to a request by a social worker who had been contacted by the school, were making a "welfare check." In other words, they were going to snoop around and try to have a lengthy coerced conversation and get some juicy quotes for somebody’s collectivist social agenda. No one had observed a crime but, these people must be brought in line.

When the cops got snubbed at the door, they got there hackles up. So they went to their in-house detective, Al, who punched his password into the post-9/11 Regional Fusion Center website and asked for a full profile on the address, the residents, and the license plates. Good thing because, although the reports came back with pages of N/A, suspect Bob had bought a gun.

The detective then went to the gun store where the gun was sold. When he looked at the store’s records, he found out that Bob had bought another gun there. Detective Al always wanted to be a federal agent, so he had an excuse to drop by the ATF office, talk to the feds, and ask them to run a check. He left ATF giddy because he now had some new buzzwords to impress his bosses and co-workers.

He proudly proclaimed back at the office, "We bounced his name off of e-trace. Yup, he’s in there boys. The ATF has this guy’s number. His name is in their system. The computer lit up like a Christmas tree when we ran his name. We bounced him off of Operation Gunrunner too." That was another database the detective heard mentioned while over at ATF. There was nothing in there for Bob, the guy he was snooping on but, the words sounded cool. Detective Al told his bosses that "ATF is all like, yeah, we are all over this guy but, they said we could deal with him."

So, long story short, Bob filled out ATF forms when he bought a couple of guns and the information from those forms was put in a computer saying that he had bought those guns. Period. But, Detective Al needed to make some hay to get his next promotion so, he latched on to whatever was passing under his nose right then. To put the icing on the cake, the detective got some federal DHS funds from the sergeant in his department that controlled Operation Stonegarden funds and decided he would do something that would excite the bosses; send a snitch in to have a recorded talk with Bob and grab some good sound bites. Detective Al was rolling in glory now; federal funds, federal databases, and now getting in good with his bosses by sending a snitch in to throw out some ideas to a suspect.

The snitch posed as a landscape guy and offered to mow Bob’s lawn. Bob said, "No thanks. I mow my own lawn." The snitch made a few more failed attempts to try to sell him some stuff out of the trunk of his car. Bob got suspicious and called 911. The police station went into Defcon 1.

The Chief called in Detective Al and said, "Shut the door. We got a call from your target’s house. Your man on the inside is compromised. We’ve got to move on this now, pronto, ASAP!!

Al didn’t want to admit that he had nothing, so he alternately shook and nodded his head to the chief, and mumbled, "That scum bag. Man this guy is trying to mess with us. I’m going to get paper on him."

"Do it!! The Chief yelled. Do it yesterday!! Get this piece of garbage out of this town. Call the paper so they can have a reporter at the raid briefing that can snap some cop pictures without faces, except mine. Ted down at the Gazette is good for that. He will hold the story ‘til we round up the perps. Get a news release roughed out about how potential school shooting violence was averted, etc."

Al then got a moment in the sun with the local prosecutor’s office. He got all his fancy words ready. He made sure to work in "e-trace" and thankfully remembered "Operation Gunrunner" at the last minute. He thought the buzzwords would awe the local prosecutor but, swamped with DUI cases, he couldn’t care less about the Regional Fusion Center data checks and all the ATF lingo.

The prosecutor asked Al if he had filled out the abbreviated telephonic search warrant form. Al said, "No, how do I do that." The prosecutor pointed at a form, handed Al the judge’s phone number, and instructed him to just call the judge. The prosecutor told Al that he could get the telephonic warrant signed by the judge after the raid.

The detective continues talking to the assembled cops, "These people are heavy into guns, so we aren’t taking any chances. SWAT will flash bang the premises and then we will hit the door and take every one down. We don’t want to give them a chance to load up, chamber rounds, and start firing. Apparently their kid is a problem child at school, and the parents are backing the kid up. We have guns there and a deviant child. That is a bad mix. We are talking about something going on here that is not kosher and we don’t need it to explode at the school into something serious. Need I say more? Need I say Littleton or Newtown? The psychiatrist on contract with family services gave us the go ahead to proclaim the parents and child as potentially dangerous, so we can take any guns we find."

After the plain clothes detective gins up the crowd, baiting them with spy novel intrigue, the SWAT commander takes over the briefing. Random scenarios are discussed. He gives a long-winded speech using lingo like "active shooter."

"What will we do if we have an active shooter? You will SITREP the metrics of the active shooter into the Command Post. If we have enough positive granularity, we will go green." A few older rube sheriff’s deputies roll their eyes at all the military lingo and bureauspeak that had crept into police work. The younger echelon of shaved head cops from multiple agencies, nod and smile showing that they don’t want to be left out of the enchanting aura of groupthink. One of the young cops says to his buddy, "Take ‘em out!" and laughs.

Another Iraq vet says, "We knew how to deal with these trouble makers in Fallujah." The vet had actually never done anything more interesting than order a 12-inch meatball sub at the Subway in his megabase in Iraq, and he wasn’t sure if he had ever actually even seen an Iraqi or maybe just brown imported contractors of some other nationality that cleaned the base but, he hoped the comment would up his street cred with the other cops.

The SWAT commander continues, "Remember folks, we are in a post 9/11 paradigm here! We aren’t playing games. These people are in it for real folks, and you better have your head in the game too! The SWAT commander had been briefed for 3 minutes by the detective before the mass briefing and chose to copy some of his cool jargon to help build the sinister aura of the evil organization. After "paradigm," he gets out e-trace, Operation Gunrunner, and throws in, just for fun, that "these folks might get hammered with RICO" because he heard that one before. He pretends like he is in the know but, just can’t say more. He dramatically says, "I’m not going to say hate crime because, well, let’s not go there, if you know what I mean." He cagily acts like he barely caught himself before accidentally revealing who the new head of Al Qaeda is. The SWAT guys in the corner snicker because they know their boss is grand-standing and knows nothing about the case.

He dramatically states, "Just keep this in mind; these people may come off all like Mr. Innocent but, they are the worst of the worst and they will shoot you just as soon as say Hello. So, remember, the most important thing, I want you all to go home to your families at the end of the shift today. Not in a body bag. If someone goes home in a body bag, make sure he is not wearing a uniform. If you see somebody going into an aggressive posture, deal with him immediately; need I say more? These people hate you and hate the government. If we have a shooting, we will have a huddle and get our story straight before anything goes out. Got it?" No one in a uniform objects to anything being said.

Different scenarios are discussed. "If we get a barricaded subject, contact me, the SWAT commander. We have ways of dealing with that. Just pull back and we will bring the armored vehicle in and we will get them out of there whether they like it or not." He puts on a big smile and there is a wide round of chuckles from the audience as each cop looks at the guy next to him with a cheese eating grin.

One cop is heard saying loudly, "That’s what I’m talking about" which causes an uproar of laughter to overtake the crowd. Another one blurts out, "Crispsy critters" which gets an even bigger laugh.

Guys swagger around with their low thigh-mounted holsters that they don’t always get to wear on regular patrol duty. Extended magazines are velcroed all over the web gear. Guys have extra ordinance hanging all over them that they usually don’t carry on regular patrol duties. It will be a fun day for all, and they might get to pull a pin on an explosive or gas dispenser that shoots out hot flames. If they are lucky, they might even see a house burn down and have a great story to tell for months. It will all be good versus evil though, so no one will need to give in to that prick from their conscience.

After the operation, the cops discuss with each other in smug fashion how "that was a cluster." When the emotions die down and they get a clear look at grandpa lying on the ground with taser barbs in him, they all make high-minded critiques amongst themselves talking about how messed up the case was. They then conveniently forget their feelings, their lessons learned, and leave the crime scene they created and go to lunch. All these conservative cops will respond to the next call though, earn their overtime, and not ask any hard questions. The sinister hard looks will be given during the sermon to justify the next raid and they will comply with that one as well. Details will again be minimal, for security, as always but, it will be made clear that the targets are really bad guys and that legal issues don’t allow the raid orchestrator to lay out the case to the door crashers.

When everyone gets sued someday, the cops didn’t know any better. The perps were all scum anyway. It’s a cover story they came up with. The story about the autistic son choking on smoke from a gas grenade was an intentional tear jerker to get the jury turned off on cops. Grandpa limping to the door without his crutches and then getting tasered was all an act to throw the cops off.

During these escapades, your conservative, "Christian," Republican, pro-2nd Amendment cop buddy will be raring to go. He will be ready to take someone out. He acts like he believes it all. He likes the power, the force, and the feeling of loyalty to a group identity that is unquestioningly focused on "the mission." He is ready to kick someone if they resist. And, he sure as shootin’ rounded up the evil scum’s guns when he broke down the door of Bob and his family, even though he had no personal knowledge of them or any illegalities committed by them.

He will use this latest war story in the Sunday school class he teaches to add to the mystique of his personal life and to show how his profession gives him a unique ability and perspective to comment credibly on Bible lessons. And yes, your cop buddy will still insist that he will never follow the gun grab orders when they come down from Obama.

April 5, 2013

David Hathaway [send him mail] is a former supervisory DEA Agent who homeschools his nine children. He enjoys writing about the injustices of the state.

Copyright © 2013 by LewRockwell.com. Permission to reprint in whole or in part is gladly granted, provided full credit is given.
The moments I was censored was the moment that I won. That's twice, now.Thanks jwbaker, et al, for my victories.
mcinfantry
Silent But Deadly
Posts: 951
Joined: Mon Feb 16, 2009 12:56 am

Re: Conservative cops and gun seizures

Post by mcinfantry »

poli, arent you a cop? or were you?

i wouldnt take them, and none of my friends would.
poikilotrm
Silent But Deadly
Posts: 3851
Joined: Tue Apr 27, 2010 12:52 pm

Re: Conservative cops and gun seizures

Post by poikilotrm »

mcinfantry wrote:poli, arent you a cop? or were you?

i wouldnt take them, and none of my friends would.
I was a LEO for a little over two years in the 90s. I was a slick sleeve nobody, and I did about zero exciting things. I was about as low speed, high drag as a basic patrol officer can be.

YOU can and will seize guns if instructed to do so, and so will your buddies.

There have been exactly zero cops who have ever resigned in protest over shitting on people's civil rights, anywhere, no matter which right. Cops eagerly restrict free speech and other civil rights at the drop of a hat. Cops will be far more eager to take guns than to restrict free speech, because they percieve regular unarmed people to be threats, so people with guns are automatically an "off the chart" terror for the cops.

If you broached the subject of 2nd Amendment rights with a CAGE officer he would instantly place you in the "lunatic threat" category.

If the order comes down to start taking guns, and some cop is foolish enough to state his opposition, he will pilloried, ostracized, and eventually s--t canned. He might even find himself arrested. It will be justified by the cops doing the seizing telling themselves that they are just following the law, that the people they are robbing and destroying are criminals and evil and "sovereigns" etc, etc, etc. The cops will also be willing to do it because they will be told that their guns will be untouched.

But I tell ya what, hoss. If you don't think cops will take guns, how about you tell me just exactly where my fucking Sig 226 is? Because my house was burglarized by about a dozen of the fuckers while in uniform, and they stole about $7000 worth of stuff, to include my West German marked pristine 226 in 9mm. Oh, and while on the stand, the sheriff, Mark McClure, was kind enough to admit that he manufactured an SBR in my house, then charged me with having an illegal SBR.

I am far more convinced from the behavior I have witnessed first hand and what I have seen reliably reported on that the idea that there are cops that won't seize guns is at best a pernicious fantasy.
The moments I was censored was the moment that I won. That's twice, now.Thanks jwbaker, et al, for my victories.
mcinfantry
Silent But Deadly
Posts: 951
Joined: Mon Feb 16, 2009 12:56 am

Re: Conservative cops and gun seizures

Post by mcinfantry »

woaaaaa, I am not a cop anymore. I did resign.

I did 8.5 years and it wasnt like the movies.
User avatar
doubloon
Silent But Deadly
Posts: 11897
Joined: Wed Dec 31, 2008 11:02 pm
Location: Houston-ish

Re: Conservative cops and gun seizures

Post by doubloon »

Noooooooooo?

Say it ain't so!

At least tell me Training Day was the real deal. :mrgreen:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BDtd2jNIwAU MUSAFAR!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8CrOL-ydFMI This is Water DavidW
Complete Form 1s http://www.silencertalk.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=10&t=79895
poikilotrm
Silent But Deadly
Posts: 3851
Joined: Tue Apr 27, 2010 12:52 pm

Re: Conservative cops and gun seizures

Post by poikilotrm »

mcinfantry wrote:woaaaaa, I am not a cop anymore. I did resign.
That ain't what you were putting forth before.
The moments I was censored was the moment that I won. That's twice, now.Thanks jwbaker, et al, for my victories.
mcinfantry
Silent But Deadly
Posts: 951
Joined: Mon Feb 16, 2009 12:56 am

Re: Conservative cops and gun seizures

Post by mcinfantry »

poikilotrm wrote:
mcinfantry wrote:woaaaaa, I am not a cop anymore. I did resign.
That ain't what you were putting forth before.
i support the police. It just wasnt for me, at that time in my life to continue.

I havent been a cop in 7 years. I never said I was still a cop

I wouldnt take them when i was a Marine nor a cop. I refused to write tickets or whatever other asinine things they encouraged us to do
User avatar
continuity
Elite Member
Posts: 4554
Joined: Thu Dec 11, 2008 6:39 am
Location: Ohio

Re: Conservative cops and gun seizures

Post by continuity »

And to think I extended a do over to you Poki...

Biggest buncha BS I've read. You can go F yourself with whatever type of red hot poker you wish Poki.

The minute your imaginative phrase "We don’t have any arrest warrants (yet)" would be voiced in any briefing I've ever been a part of, people would start getting up and leaving the briefing. Regardless of rank input. And speaking to that, our rank would, despite perceived faults, NEVER assemble a SWAT response to a non immediate, warrantless incident. Am aware of at least one Fed presence sent packing relative an arrest warrant, that had no accompanying search warrant. It is rumored that our rank verifies warrants, Fed, State, or local, by phone contact with the issuing judge prior to committing personnel.

To clarify... an arrest warrant requires factual evidence of person presence. A vehicle bearing the registration of that person, parked in a driveway, is not factual evidence that the person named, is in the associated residence. If a search warrant for that residence is available, in conjunction/authorized, then forced entry will happen. The key is warrants in hand, and what type. No appropriate warrant.. no tickee.

F you poki. Your diatribe is worthy of a ready to be convicted felon, statement(s) on the stand. If your're trying to gin up emotional "lets go get them" reasons, you're sadly failing here.

The Sheriff's office I'm attached to, has a demonstrated sensitivity to constitution law. As it should be.

Go peddle your crap elsewhere Poki.
What amount of a man is composed of his own collection of experiences... and the conclusions that those experiences have allowed him to "know" for certain as "Truth"? :Ick
poikilotrm
Silent But Deadly
Posts: 3851
Joined: Tue Apr 27, 2010 12:52 pm

Re: Conservative cops and gun seizures

Post by poikilotrm »

Please allow me to retort, Con. You are full of s--t. This isn't an opinion, this is a reasonable observation given the absolutely overwhelming amount of evidence out there concerning day to day cop behavior. I know criminals and oath breakers like you don't like being exposed any more than a cockroach likes light, but that's just the way it is.

I can post link after link illustrating my point. Can you show me any instances that would support your's? MY fave is the picture of a mob of cops in uniform holding up signs that read "Danziger Heroes" in support of mass murderers.

I can show you lots and lots of cases where cops have done all manner of heinous things. I can show you where other cops then actively cover up for those scumbags. Somehow, your vapid and facile assertion that your crew is "sensitive" to the Constitution, whatever the F--k that means, fails to soothe.

You are part of an organized crime racket. You know this, and you don't like it being exposed. You hate it when the lies and propaganda are laid bare, showing present day LE's true face and intent.

As for statements actually made in court, I sat there and listened to lawyers for a bunch of your fellow officers describe their blatant felonies, violations of oath, and complete batshit insanity as "brave" and "duty" and "professional".

I am certain that Moscow's cops under Stalin held themselves in the same high esteem as you and your fellow cops do today. That doesn't mean they weren't as loathesome as pedophiles when viewed in an objective light.

Lastly, you are willfully ignoring the fact that if told the proper story, a story that allows a cop to claim QI while implying plausible target villainy, then ANY cop will go without a warrant, or with being told that a "warrant is on the way".
The moments I was censored was the moment that I won. That's twice, now.Thanks jwbaker, et al, for my victories.
mcinfantry
Silent But Deadly
Posts: 951
Joined: Mon Feb 16, 2009 12:56 am

Re: Conservative cops and gun seizures

Post by mcinfantry »

poikilotrm wrote:Please allow me to retort, Con. You are full of s--t. This isn't an opinion, this is a reasonable observation given the absolutely overwhelming amount of evidence out there concerning day to day cop behavior. I know criminals and oath breakers like you don't like being exposed any more than a cockroach likes light, but that's just the way it is.

I can post link after link illustrating my point. Can you show me any instances that would support your's? MY fave is the picture of a mob of cops in uniform holding up signs that read "Danziger Heroes" in support of mass murderers.

I can show you lots and lots of cases where cops have done all manner of heinous things. I can show you where other cops then actively cover up for those scumbags. Somehow, your vapid and facile assertion that your crew is "sensitive" to the Constitution, whatever the F--k that means, fails to soothe.

You are part of an organized crime racket. You know this, and you don't like it being exposed. You hate it when the lies and propaganda are laid bare, showing present day LE's true face and intent.

As for statements actually made in court, I sat there and listened to lawyers for a bunch of your fellow officers describe their blatant felonies, violations of oath, and complete batshit insanity as "brave" and "duty" and "professional".

I am certain that Moscow's cops under Stalin held themselves in the same high esteem as you and your fellow cops do today. That doesn't mean they weren't as loathesome as pedophiles when viewed in an objective light.

Lastly, you are willfully ignoring the fact that if told the proper story, a story that allows a cop to claim QI while implying plausible target villainy, then ANY cop will go without a warrant, or with being told that a "warrant is on the way".
wow, were you fired? or quit in lieu of termination?

also in your 2 years did you go to the feds/state with all you know?
poikilotrm
Silent But Deadly
Posts: 3851
Joined: Tue Apr 27, 2010 12:52 pm

Re: Conservative cops and gun seizures

Post by poikilotrm »

mcinfantry wrote: wow, were you fired? or quit in lieu of termination?
No. Were you? Did you? I am going to ignore the implied insult you just gave me.
also in your 2 years did you go to the feds/state with all you know?
I went to the LSP with some documented and taped evidence concerning my COP. The investigator was pretty enthusiastic, then a week later told me they wouldn't be doing anything. He must have said "I'm sorry" about thirty times on the phone, and that was without being prompted. He was genuinely ashamed, but hey man, gotta follow orders, gotta get paid. The FBI was a lot more worried about the NOPD running coke and committing murder for hire than some petty s--t in nowheresville.

As far as the other s--t, that happened starting in 2006. Here's a link: http://www.onlineathens.com/stories/082 ... 5101.shtml
The moments I was censored was the moment that I won. That's twice, now.Thanks jwbaker, et al, for my victories.
mcinfantry
Silent But Deadly
Posts: 951
Joined: Mon Feb 16, 2009 12:56 am

Re: Conservative cops and gun seizures

Post by mcinfantry »

i wasnt accusing. as mad as you are at police and believe they are evil generally comes from people who were fired or quit in lieu of being fired. and i assumed they may have which is part of the anger.

that all.
poikilotrm
Silent But Deadly
Posts: 3851
Joined: Tue Apr 27, 2010 12:52 pm

Re: Conservative cops and gun seizures

Post by poikilotrm »

No, I was always pretty pro cop, despite some of the s--t I saw. When they burglarized my house, among a ton of other things, my attitude changed, big time.
The moments I was censored was the moment that I won. That's twice, now.Thanks jwbaker, et al, for my victories.
User avatar
bakerjw
Elite Member
Posts: 3622
Joined: Fri Jul 06, 2007 8:13 am
Location: NE Tenn.

Re: Conservative cops and gun seizures

Post by bakerjw »

Best advice? Put him on ignore.
And please don't quote him.
July 5th, 2016. The day that we moved from a soft tyranny to a hard tyranny.
poikilotrm
Silent But Deadly
Posts: 3851
Joined: Tue Apr 27, 2010 12:52 pm

Re: Conservative cops and gun seizures

Post by poikilotrm »

bakerjw wrote:Best advice? Put him on ignore.
And please don't quote him.
I heard there's a fresh bit of grease that's dripped between the stove and counter. Scurry along now, have a nice snack.
The moments I was censored was the moment that I won. That's twice, now.Thanks jwbaker, et al, for my victories.
User avatar
continuity
Elite Member
Posts: 4554
Joined: Thu Dec 11, 2008 6:39 am
Location: Ohio

Re: Conservative cops and gun seizures

Post by continuity »

bakerjw wrote:Best advice? Put him on ignore.
And please don't quote him.
I hear ya. The raw intelligence is refreshing. The misdirection of focus is frustrating.
What amount of a man is composed of his own collection of experiences... and the conclusions that those experiences have allowed him to "know" for certain as "Truth"? :Ick
poikilotrm
Silent But Deadly
Posts: 3851
Joined: Tue Apr 27, 2010 12:52 pm

Re: Conservative cops and gun seizures

Post by poikilotrm »

Ya know Con, maybe the way forward is simply to show a few instances where cops refused to seize guns. You claim a 165 IQ. If you can refute me with facts, like an intelligent person, instead of engaging in this sad emotional flailing about like a Feinstein supporter, I will be defeated. Facts support my contentions, facts can defeat my position.
The moments I was censored was the moment that I won. That's twice, now.Thanks jwbaker, et al, for my victories.
User avatar
doubloon
Silent But Deadly
Posts: 11897
Joined: Wed Dec 31, 2008 11:02 pm
Location: Houston-ish

Re: Conservative cops and gun seizures

Post by doubloon »

poikilotrm wrote:... You claim a 165 IQ. ...
"As tested" IIRC.

Hey where is this test? I've taken a few and I've never been able to crack the 160 ceiling, maybe this will be my lucky test.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BDtd2jNIwAU MUSAFAR!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8CrOL-ydFMI This is Water DavidW
Complete Form 1s http://www.silencertalk.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=10&t=79895
User avatar
continuity
Elite Member
Posts: 4554
Joined: Thu Dec 11, 2008 6:39 am
Location: Ohio

Re: Conservative cops and gun seizures

Post by continuity »

Hmmm... I was reminded by a friend that that the test score I like to repeat of 165 was disclaimed in a second letter. She poked me in the chest and told me that i knew the test group made the number to be 135. Say's she remembers because I was exactly 15 f'in points lower than her on the same test. How can such a smart ass forget to put gas in a car? At the time it was a who gives a F--k thing. Sometimes I think a better sense of direction would have been more practical. As in sans GPS or a map with a north arrow, a you are here "x", and a compass... I could get lost in my own bathroom. Guess it falls under one of those it is what it is things.

Think it was binnet-sadler or something like that.
What amount of a man is composed of his own collection of experiences... and the conclusions that those experiences have allowed him to "know" for certain as "Truth"? :Ick
User avatar
doubloon
Silent But Deadly
Posts: 11897
Joined: Wed Dec 31, 2008 11:02 pm
Location: Houston-ish

Re: Conservative cops and gun seizures

Post by doubloon »

continuity wrote:... How can such a smart ass forget to put gas in a car? ...
Someone once said the difference between stupidity and genius is that genius has its limits.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BDtd2jNIwAU MUSAFAR!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8CrOL-ydFMI This is Water DavidW
Complete Form 1s http://www.silencertalk.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=10&t=79895
poikilotrm
Silent But Deadly
Posts: 3851
Joined: Tue Apr 27, 2010 12:52 pm

Re: Conservative cops and gun seizures

Post by poikilotrm »

Stanford Binet. Quit dodging. Address the issue.
The moments I was censored was the moment that I won. That's twice, now.Thanks jwbaker, et al, for my victories.
User avatar
doubloon
Silent But Deadly
Posts: 11897
Joined: Wed Dec 31, 2008 11:02 pm
Location: Houston-ish

Re: Conservative cops and gun seizures

Post by doubloon »

Wow!

I looked at the sample test questions and it seems a little biased against certain cultures. If you've never seen a spoon before that's 33% of the sample test score.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BDtd2jNIwAU MUSAFAR!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8CrOL-ydFMI This is Water DavidW
Complete Form 1s http://www.silencertalk.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=10&t=79895
User avatar
doubloon
Silent But Deadly
Posts: 11897
Joined: Wed Dec 31, 2008 11:02 pm
Location: Houston-ish

Re: Conservative cops and gun seizures

Post by doubloon »

continuity wrote:... Sometimes I think a better sense of direction would have been more practical. ...
So what about personality tests ... like the Meyers-Briggs thing?

You seem a little ENTP to me.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BDtd2jNIwAU MUSAFAR!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8CrOL-ydFMI This is Water DavidW
Complete Form 1s http://www.silencertalk.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=10&t=79895
User avatar
continuity
Elite Member
Posts: 4554
Joined: Thu Dec 11, 2008 6:39 am
Location: Ohio

Re: Conservative cops and gun seizures

Post by continuity »

poikilotrm wrote:Stanford Binet. Quit dodging. Address the issue.
What issue weed hopper? The one where I can mentally beat you about the room like ping pong ball? Go about your business of windmill tilting sucka.

Your single mindedness suggests you're not getting any pussie. Maybe that's not your thing. Relax. Focus on the important things in life. Remember this IS the internet. For all you know, you're getting all wound up at a genius level 12 year old that's rustling your jimmies.

Are your jimmies rustled poiki?
What amount of a man is composed of his own collection of experiences... and the conclusions that those experiences have allowed him to "know" for certain as "Truth"? :Ick
User avatar
continuity
Elite Member
Posts: 4554
Joined: Thu Dec 11, 2008 6:39 am
Location: Ohio

Re: Conservative cops and gun seizures

Post by continuity »

doubloon wrote:So what about personality tests ... like the Meyers-Briggs thing?

You seem a little ENTP to me.
Hmmm.... In retrospect, interesting assessment. In some ways sorta the nail on head thing bro. Regardless of the looking the mirror stuff... am a crisis intervention resource. Persons in mental crisis stuff. It's ancillary to "regular" patrol duties. Who am I to be interjected into such situations? Is it because it takes one to know one?

Sometimes I get up early before duty... take a cup of coffee and a good cigar out to the deck and just listen to the birds waking up. Good for the soul stuff... Birds are the picture of well adjusted.

Smokes the ENTP assessment

Think my cruiser needs washed.

Peace.
What amount of a man is composed of his own collection of experiences... and the conclusions that those experiences have allowed him to "know" for certain as "Truth"? :Ick
Post Reply