Tax judge arrested for tax evasion

Discuss anything with like-minded people.
No posting of copyrighted material.

Moderators: mpallett, bakerjw, renegade, Hush

Post Reply
poikilotrm
Silent But Deadly
Posts: 3851
Joined: Tue Apr 27, 2010 12:52 pm

Tax judge arrested for tax evasion

Post by poikilotrm »

The power to tax is the power to destroy. :lol:

Retired U.S. Tax Court Judge Indicted For Tax Evasion While She Sat On The Court
Tuesday, April 5, 2016
By Paul Caron

http://taxprof.typepad.com/taxprof_blog ... asion.html

U.S. Department of Justice Press Release, Former United States Tax Court Judge and Husband Indicted for Conspiracy to Commit Tax Evasion and Obstruction of an IRS Audit:

Diane Kroupa Filed Fraudulent Tax Returns While a Sitting U.S. Tax Court
Judge Kroupa and Her Husband Conspired to Evade More Than $400,000 in Federal Taxes

U.S. Attorney Andrew M. Luger for the District of Minnesota today announced a federal indictment charging Diane L. Kroupa, 60, and her husband, Robert E. Fackler, 62, with conspiring with each other to evade assessment of taxes. Each defendant is charged with conspiracy, tax evasion, making and subscribing false tax returns and obstruction of an Internal Revenue Service (IRS) audit. The defendants are expected to appear later this week in U.S. District Court in Minneapolis, Minnesota.

“The allegations in this indictment are deeply disturbing,” said U.S. Attorney Andrew Luger. “The tax laws of this county apply to everyone, and those of us appointed to federal positions must hold ourselves to an even higher standard.”

“As a former tax court judge, Kroupa dealt regularly with individuals who cheated on their taxes, which makes these allegations particularly reprehensible,” said Chief Richard Weber of the IRS- Criminal Investigation. “Reporting personal expenses as business expenses on your tax returns is not tolerated, regardless of your job or position. We expect all taxpayers to follow the law—whether you are a business owner, individual, or government official—we all must play by the same rules and pay our fair share.”

According to the indictment and documents filed in court, between 2004 and 2012, Kroupa and Fackler conspired to evade their tax obligations. Kroupa was appointed to the U.S. Tax Court on June 13, 2003, for a term of 15 years, but she retired on June 16, 2014. During the same period, Fackler was a self-employed lobbyist and political consultant who owned and operated a business known as Grassroots Consulting. From 2004 to 2013, Kroupa and Fackler owned a home in Minnesota. From 2007 to 2013, they also leased a second residence in Maryland.

According to the indictment and documents filed in court, as part of the conspiracy to defraud the United States, Kroupa and Fackler fraudulently claimed personal expenses as Grassroots Consulting business deductions. They fraudulently claimed the following personal expenses as deductible business expenses: rent and utilities for the Maryland home; utilities, upkeep and renovation expenses of the Minnesota home; pilates classes; spa and massage fees; jewelry and personal clothing; wine club fees; Chinese language tutoring; music lessons; personal computers; and expenses for vacations to Alaska, Australia, the Bahamas, China, England, Greece, Hawaii, Mexico and Thailand.

According to the indictment and documents filed in court, Kroupa and Fackler made a series of other false claims on their tax returns, including failing to report approximately $44,520 that Kroupa received from a 2010 land sale in South Dakota. The defendants falsely claimed financial insolvency to avoid paying tax on $33,031 on cancellation of indebtedness income.

According to the indictment and documents filed in court, in 2006, Kroupa and Fackler concealed documents from their tax preparer and an IRS Tax Compliance Officer during an audit. During a second audit in 2012, Kroupa and Fackler caused misleading documents to be delivered to an IRS employee in order to convince the IRS employee that certain personal expenses were actually business expenses of Grassroots Consulting.

According to the indictment and documents filed in court, between 2004 and 2010, Kroupa and Fackler purposely understated their taxable income by approximately $1 million and purposely understated the amount of tax they owed by at least $400,000.
The moments I was censored was the moment that I won. That's twice, now.Thanks jwbaker, et al, for my victories.
johndoe3
Silent But Deadly
Posts: 2710
Joined: Tue Feb 27, 2007 3:02 am
Location: N. Colorado

Re: Tax judge arrested for tax evasion

Post by johndoe3 »

Since the wife was a Tax Judge, they ought to have known how to use the best techniques to game the system.

Legally gaming the system of legal deductions is not fraud--sometimes it is a difference of opinion on where the line is drawn.

Actually, some of the types of deductions the gov't is claiming are false, are in gray areas and when all the dust settles on this case, the gov't may end up with far less of tax avoidance than claimed here at the beginning.

For example, owning 2 homes and using them partially for business and partially for personal, plus home offices, etc. leaves a lot of gray area. Some of the other disputed deductions flow out from partial use of the homes for business.

My point is that the US Attorney is making big claims of fraud for press purposes, when anyone knowledgeable of the tax system sees most of the gov't's claims are in gray areas to begin with. IMHO
You can fool all of the people some of the time, and some of the people all of the time...and those are pretty good odds.
Brett Maverick, gambler on TV (also used by Progressive leaders everywhere)
User avatar
whiterussian1974
Silent But Deadly
Posts: 2857
Joined: Sat Sep 28, 2013 11:37 pm
Location: On 8th line of eye chart.

Re: Tax judge arrested for tax evasion

Post by whiterussian1974 »

johndoe3 wrote:My point is that the US Attorney is making big claims of fraud for press purposes, when anyone knowledgeable of the tax system sees most of the gov't's claims are in gray areas to begin with. IMHO
It seems that the real issue is that the DoJ is going after retired Judges who have left the Bench, and therefore lost the Power they once held.

I'd be interested in learning which enemies she made while Seated. And look at her more contested Rulings. Was she too lenient upon the Public? Did she hold the DoJ to a reasonable Burden and thereby upset them for being fair?

They want to send a message to all current Judges: "Rubberstamp our Filings and Motions or we'll be coming after YOU once you can no longer harm us." Any wonder why FISA Judges are hand-picked and almost NEVER deny a Request?

Same with Grand Juries. Handpicked in many Jurisdictions and 'Conditioned' by the Prosecutor during the 1st 2 weeks of Empanelment to vote leniency in the 1st week for cases they just want to go away, and Severity the 2nd week on cases that are overwhelmingly documented. This establishes the DogWhistle response for the remainder of their Session.

Someone High-Profile that's given heavily to their Campaigns and 'Cash Gifts' at 'Private Parties'? Leniency and soft recommendations for Dismissal or Low Charges which are Pled with fines and Time Served or Deferred Adjudication.

No High-Power Lawyer who is generous with 'contributions'? Give them the Axe!
The Darkest Corners of Hell are reserved for those who remain Neutral!-Dante
The Death of One is a Tragedy, a million only a statistic.-Stalin
silencertalk.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=10&t=135314
Post Reply