inglorious bastards

trey_phish83 · Post by **trey_phish83** » Mon Aug 31, 2009 9:04 pm

this movie sucked. you expect brad pitt to be running around paris shooting nazi's in the face with some sort of historical accuracy. the whole movie is centered around burning down a movie theater with a crowd of big wig nazi's in it. they even kill hitler in the end. very very stupid. the gun play isn't even good. there is maybe 2-3 shootouts and they all suck.

pretty much, with what i said, and the previews you've watched, you've seen the whole movie.

oh, and if you like subtitles, you'll love this movie, because 90% of the movie is in either german or french. and brad pitt maybe is on screen for 20 minutes.

watch it free at tvshack and save your money for bullets.

here's the link

YugoRPK · Post by **YugoRPK** » Mon Aug 31, 2009 9:17 pm

I thought it sucked too. I was expecting some good battle scenes or at least some ambush scenes. NADA !!! Lots of German and lots of French but nothing that made me want to anything other than be happy I didnt actually pay to see it in a theater. The ending was stupid. Why spend the whole movie trying to stress realism and then come out with that stinking bowl of elephant piss alternative history ending?

Smalldog · Post by **Smalldog** » Mon Aug 31, 2009 9:25 pm

I tried to warn you guys with the spoiler.....

I gave it an alright....

bigbigpig · Post by **bigbigpig** » Mon Aug 31, 2009 11:08 pm

I guess I'll be the first to say I liked it a lot. I didn't think it would be solid gunfighting action from beginning to end. Nor did I want it to be. A lot of people have said that it wasn't historically accurate; but it was never said to be historically accurate.

ruggedtraditions · Post by **ruggedtraditions** » Mon Aug 31, 2009 11:21 pm

Its a Quentin Tarantino film. What did you expect. I went to it knowing it would be a similar style to his previous films.

Did you really expect quality action scenes? I thought it was more of a comedy than an action movie.

I thought it was worth watching. However I dont think I would pay to see it in the theater.

joshrunkle35 · Post by **joshrunkle35** » Tue Sep 01, 2009 1:15 am

I thought it was awesome. I loved every minute of it. I plan on seeing it again. Soon.

It's called imagination.

And it's not "Inglorious Bastards." It's "Inglourious Basterds."

paco ramirez · Post by **paco ramirez** » Tue Sep 01, 2009 2:16 am

My dad said it was corny.

steve7478 · Post by **steve7478** » Tue Sep 01, 2009 3:03 am

Thank you for the link and saving me the $30. It was entertaining.

If I did not know who made this film, and was asked afterward to guess who was responsible, my one and only guess would be Quentin Tarantino.

YugoRPK · Post by **YugoRPK** » Tue Sep 01, 2009 8:41 am

steve7478 wrote:Thank you for the link and saving me the $30. It was entertaining.

If I did not know who made this film, and was asked afterward to guess who was responsible, my one and only guess would be Quentin Tarantino.

Yeah that would be a hard guess. People sitting around the table talking smack about nothing to do with the plot line for 5 minutes with a camera panning around them and showing up after the action is over dealing with the aftermath...Tarantino.

steve7478 · Post by **steve7478** » Tue Sep 01, 2009 11:47 am

Yugo you see my point exactly.

Twinsen · Post by **Twinsen** » Tue Sep 01, 2009 12:07 pm

Why did he shoot him in the balls instead of the head? If he shot him in the head they would have all lived. AGHHGAHGHAGAGHAGHGHAHGAHGAHGHGHGHGHGAHGAHGHGHGHGHGHGhhhhhh

Hush · Post by **Hush** » Tue Sep 01, 2009 1:22 pm

Not one of his best but it did have the Tarantino mark to it.

Dweezil · Post by **Dweezil** » Tue Sep 01, 2009 1:56 pm

I thought it was funny as s--t. Pretty good character development with the "Jew Hunter" and theater owner as well. I'll probably buy it. Anybody expecting, this, or any Tarantino flick to be realistic or historically accurate is on crack...and obviously didn't read the reviews. I'd put it up there with "Tropic Thunder" or "Deliverance."

continuity · Post by **continuity** » Tue Sep 01, 2009 2:02 pm

Dweezil wrote:I thought it was funny as s--t. Pretty good character development with the "Jew Hunter" and theater owner as well. I'll probably buy it. Anybody expecting, this, or any Tarantino flick to be realistic or historically accurate is on crack...and obviously didn't read the reviews. I'd put it up there with "Tropic Thunder" or "Deliverance."

Whoa!! Whoa there I say!! Deliverance is a classic on par with the Iliad!

Shame on ya.

JacksonBrowne · Post by **JacksonBrowne** » Tue Sep 01, 2009 2:09 pm

I laughed my ass off.

Dweezil · Post by **Dweezil** » Tue Sep 01, 2009 6:03 pm

continuity wrote:
Dweezil wrote:I thought it was funny as s--t. Pretty good character development with the "Jew Hunter" and theater owner as well. I'll probably buy it. Anybody expecting, this, or any Tarantino flick to be realistic or historically accurate is on crack...and obviously didn't read the reviews. I'd put it up there with "Tropic Thunder" or "Deliverance."
Whoa!! Whoa there I say!! Deliverance is a classic on par with the Iliad!

Shame on ya.

Bullshit: Deliverance is WAAYY better than the Iliad. C'mon...how many classic lines from the Iliad can you remember, especially when you're drunk.

Ronzo · Post by **Ronzo** » Tue Sep 01, 2009 6:15 pm

JacksonBrowne wrote:I laughed my ass off.

I loved it,if this movie isn't the best ad for getting rid of gun control it's close. SS Colonel drops by for a glass of milk. . yeah . .OK. All in all a funny movie.

dae.edorian · Post by **dae.edorian** » Tue Sep 01, 2009 7:35 pm

It's a dark comedy that's purely dialogue driven. If you go in expecting a war movie or even an action movie, you're going to be disappointed.

If you go in looking for some classic scenes and great lines a-la reservoir dogs or pulp fiction, you'll get your money's worth.

Historical accuracy is something this film quite deliberately set out to avoid.

I thoroughly enjoyed it, and found it much more entertaining than his other recent works. (Death Proof and Kill Bill).

Killing Hitler at the end isn't stupid, it's hilarious. I mean, his face is blown apart by an MP-40 at point blank range and then he's blown up. That's just classic.

In a totally unrelated note, District 9 did nothing for me.

Smalldog · Post by **Smalldog** » Tue Sep 01, 2009 10:05 pm

Tell us about District 9......

JohnInNH · Post by **JohnInNH** » Tue Sep 01, 2009 11:07 pm

Smalldog wrote:Tell us about District 9......

You will have to wait 3 years.

noiseless · Post by **noiseless** » Wed Sep 02, 2009 7:01 am

I was bored

There were like six good laughs in it and every action scene except the bar was in the previews.

If your wanting an "Action Movie", see something else.

If you want dialog . . . lots of dialog . . . lots of subtitled dialog. Lots of repetitious, boring, subtitled dialog . . . and very little cheractor development . . . see this movie

I will give credit in that the costumes and cinematography was awesome

ek1179 · Post by **ek1179** » Wed Sep 02, 2009 1:54 pm

I hope people know this movie is a rehash of a 1970something flik.

dae.edorian · Post by **dae.edorian** » Wed Sep 02, 2009 10:20 pm

ek1179 wrote:I hope people know this movie is a rehash of a 1970something flik.

Actually, it's almost totally unrelated to the original "Inglorious Bastards" besides the name. Tarantino just lifted the title. It's not a remake.

JohnInNH · Post by **JohnInNH** » Wed Sep 02, 2009 10:56 pm

ek1179 wrote:I hope people know this movie is a rehash of a 1970something flik.

I remember a few scenes which were almost exactly the same as in some old movie I have seen. Can't remember the name of the old movie... but the cards stuck on the foreheads scene was exact. A lot was familiar but its been so long ago I can't remember.

I just watched it on the net. Not worth the price of admission in my opinion.. But different strokes.

commissar_yarrick · Post by **commissar_yarrick** » Thu Sep 03, 2009 12:55 am

dae.edorian wrote:
ek1179 wrote:I hope people know this movie is a rehash of a 1970something flik.
Actually, it's almost totally unrelated to the original "Inglorious Bastards" besides the name. Tarantino just lifted the title. It's not a remake.

Tarintino was originally going to do a remake but decided on a homage.