Obama Talks of New ‘International Order’ at West Point

Discuss anything with like-minded people.
No posting of copyrighted material.

Moderators: mpallett, bakerjw, renegade, Hush

Post Reply
User avatar
Hush
Silent But Deadly
Posts: 65403
Joined: Wed May 18, 2005 7:07 pm

Obama Talks of New ‘International Order’ at West Point

Post by Hush »

Obama Talks of New ‘International Order’ at West Point

"So we have to shape an international order that can meet the challenges of our generation. We will be steadfast in strengthening those old alliances that have served us so well, including those who will serve by your side in Afghanistan and around the globe. As influence extends to more countries and capitals, we also have to build new partnerships, and shape stronger international standards and institutions."

http://www.breitbart.tv/obama-talks-of- ... est-point/

Comment:
West Point Cadet May 22nd, 2010 - 5:59 pm

This bozo is our Commander in Chief? This coward who never registered with the military? This usurper fraud from another country? This liar who got into Harvard with Saudi influence? This common thug who hates white America? This Communist?

It was tough sitting there listening to this Kenyan.
Demand stringent background and mental health checks on your politicians.
User avatar
cmoore
Silent But Deadly
Posts: 198
Joined: Sat Mar 14, 2009 10:51 pm
Location: Dago, Kalifornicated

Re: Obama Talks of New ‘International Order’ at West Point

Post by cmoore »

It must be confusing at times for cadets. They sign-up to do the right thing, yet are instructed to follow orders from a moron who doesn't even have the verifiable credentials to hold office in the first place.

Kudos to those cadets who recognize the veiled face of dishonor that hides behind our Constitution and its Amendments, while simultaneously dismanteling the same.

We are in for some s--t never before seen...

Best regards to you all....
cmoore...

out...

"You get more with a kind word and a gun, than a kind word alone".-- Al Capone

"By the way, it's inches that I'm giving you..."- Roman
User avatar
sre1
Member
Posts: 34
Joined: Sun Sep 28, 2008 10:42 am
Location: Ft. Knox

Re: Obama Talks of New ‘International Order’ at West Point

Post by sre1 »

Hush wrote:Obama Talks of New ‘International Order’ at West Point

"So we have to shape an international order that can meet the challenges of our generation. We will be steadfast in strengthening those old alliances that have served us so well, including those who will serve by your side in Afghanistan and around the globe. As influence extends to more countries and capitals, we also have to build new partnerships, and shape stronger international standards and institutions."

http://www.breitbart.tv/obama-talks-of- ... est-point/

Comment:
West Point Cadet May 22nd, 2010 - 5:59 pm

This bozo is our Commander in Chief? This coward who never registered with the military? This usurper fraud from another country? This liar who got into Harvard with Saudi influence? This common thug who hates white America? This Communist?

It was tough sitting there listening to this Kenyan.
I couldn't agree more.
"... I will consider him neither my Commander in Chief nor my President, but rather, a usurper to the Office..." - 1LT SRE1, Feb 23, 2009
http://www.wnd.com/?pageId=89837
User avatar
MicroGuy
Silent But Deadly
Posts: 7905
Joined: Fri Aug 10, 2007 11:38 am
Location: Flowery Branch, Georgia. USA

Re: Obama Talks of New ‘International Order’ at West Point

Post by MicroGuy »

Remember when the left went bonkers over "Bush's NWO"???? They went crazy, saying all kinds of nutty stuff about Bush going to create a New World Order, when he never said any such thing. They just assumed that's what he was up to.


Now we have this creep, actually saying it, and the silence is deafening.... Chirp..... chirp.... chirp.....
"The American Republic will endure until the day Congress discovers that it can bribe the public with the public's money." Alexis de Tocqueville
User avatar
Russian
Silent But Deadly
Posts: 1666
Joined: Mon Oct 30, 2006 11:49 am

Re: Obama Talks of New ‘International Order’ at West Point

Post by Russian »

I don't recall the Left getting up in arms about the New World Order. It was rightwing ideologues that had a problem with the NWO because of the implications of international legal standards (states rights, gun ownership) and UN-based decisions (reduced local autonomy, indecisiveness). It's like not like the Right loved George HW Bush after the 89 Import Ban.

Any soldier who refers to any President of the United States as a usurper to the Office should be dismissed. This isn't Central fucking America. The military is and should always be the apolitical armed force in defense of the US Constition and American foreign policy.

And it's not like Obama took power in a military coup. He won a fair and open election. It happened. Accept it. Move on. Just focus on defeating those who supported his policies in upcoming mid-term elections. Maybe then we'll have some hope of getting US fiscal policy back on track.

Until then, stop acting like you're defending the Constitution by supporting turncoat political hacks in uniform. If this guy said he wouldn't support GWB because he dodged serving in Vietnam and wasn't elected by a majority of Americans, you would be calling for his court martial.
User avatar
Tyris
Silent But Deadly
Posts: 2337
Joined: Mon Nov 21, 2005 1:41 am
Location: Oregon

Re: Obama Talks of New ‘International Order’ at West Point

Post by Tyris »

MicroGuy wrote:Remember when the left went bonkers over "Bush's NWO"???? They went crazy, saying all kinds of nutty stuff about Bush going to create a New World Order, when he never said any such thing. They just assumed that's what he was up to.


Now we have this creep, actually saying it, and the silence is deafening.... Chirp..... chirp.... chirp.....
Have you started to figure out that this is because there is little practical difference between republican and democrat except for a handful of "divisive" issues which are all political theater used to capture and hold the attention of idiots.

Both "parties" are for larger debt, larger government and curtailment of liberties, and abrogation of sovereign power to international "interests". They switch off every few years so retarded voters think they made some progress and that their votes are worth something.

-T
Post Reply