Of the 4 finalists for the new SCOTUS position, 3rd circuit Appeals Court judge Thomas Hardiman has the published pro-gun "chops" for the job. Below is what a leftist UCLA Law Professor fears...http://dailycaller.com/2018/07/07/law-professor-scotus-extremist-firearms/
A law professor described Judge Thomas Hardiman, a candidate for the impending Supreme Court nomination, as a “Second Amendment extremist” for his originalist view of the Constitution, specifically regarding the Second Amendment.
Professor Adam Winkler at the University of California at Los Angeles School of Law argued that if Hardiman were confirmed, the Supreme Court would be more likely to take up cases challenging current firearm laws, lending the potential for those laws to be struck down. Consequently, with Hardiman on the Supreme Court, there would be more legal gun ownership in what are now heavily regulated states like California and Connecticut.
“He believes the government has very little leeway in regulating guns,” Winkler told The Washington Post. “He thinks the only type of gun-control laws that are constitutionally permissible are the ones that existed at the founding.”
Most notably, Hardiman wrote a 40-page dissent for Drake v. Filko where he argued the Second Amendment guarantees the right to carry a firearm in public “because the need for self-defense naturally exists both outside and inside the home, I would hold that the Second Amendment applies outside the home.”
Asserting the RKBA in the home and in public is hardly extremist in my view. In the rest of America Professor Winkler, outside the coastal States like CA, the right to carry a gun in public is the norm and not extremist.