SilencerTalk

Sound Suppressor Discussion
It is currently Mon Mar 25, 2019 5:24 am

All times are UTC-04:00




Post new topic  Reply to topic  [ 3 posts ] 
Author Message
PostPosted: Sat Jan 05, 2019 6:03 pm 
Offline
Silent But Deadly

Joined: Tue Feb 27, 2007 5:02 am
Posts: 2618
Location: N. Colorado
https://www.nraila.org/articles/20190104/researchers-credit-right-to-carry-law-with-reduction-in-chicago-property-crimes

A new Research Paper shows that in Chicago property crime decreased over 3 time periods following IL passing Shall Issue concealed carry. Two researchers from Ball State and Villanova Universities in Applied Economics Letters collaborated to test Mayor Rahm Emanuel's assertion that increased concealed carry and gun ownership would lead to an increase in crime in Chicago and Illinois. The Mayor was proven wrong.

Quote:
Yet, even while benefitting from armed protection at the expense of taxpayers, Chicago Mayor Rahm Emanuel maintained that “gun control is essential,” and that the new concealed carry law would result in an increase in crime.

Recently, two researchers disproved at least some of Emanuel’s prognostications and added to the growing body of evidence that allowing citizens the right to defend themselves with guns outside their homes can lead to a decrease in crime (see, e.g., here, here, here, and here for examples). Publishing in Applied Economics Letters, Srikant Devaraj and Pankaj Patel (from Ball State University and Villanova University, respectively) used neighborhood-level crime reports from Chicago and Philadelphia during the period January 2006 to December 2015. Their goal was to ascertain the effect of the Illinois concealed carry law on property crimes in Chicago, with the Philadelphia data serving as a “control” comparison over the same term. (Philly was selected because of its similar population density, demographic characteristics, and property crime levels, and because Pennsylvania also is a shall-issue state.)

Using a variation of regression analysis (i.e., zero-inflated negative binomial regression, appropriate when data are counts of an event, occurrence, etc., and having high/frequent occurrence of zeros as values), Devaraj and Patel assessed property crime rates as a function of the availability of permits in Illinois, examining rates prior to the introduction of shall-issue and at three points following the law’s enactment: 0-6 months, 6-12 months, and 1 year or later. Other, potentially important variables for which the researchers controlled were the number of violent crimes; overall time trend; economic recession; whether a crime was reported on the first day of the year or first day of the month (to account for artifacts in record-keeping); and, the city in which the crime was reported.

“The results show[ed] that after the implementation of the ‘shall issue’ CCW law in Chicago, property crimes decreased,” and the reduction continued across all three time intervals.

_________________
You can fool all of the people some of the time, and some of the people all of the time...and those are pretty good odds.
Brett Maverick, gambler on TV (also used by Progressive leaders everywhere)


Top
   
BulletFlight for Android
PostPosted: Sun Jan 06, 2019 1:24 am 
Offline
Silent But Deadly
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jan 01, 2009 1:02 am
Posts: 11901
Location: Houston-ish
It's the jobs that reduced the crime.

Unemployment is at a historic low ... hugely important.

:mrgreen:

_________________
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BDtd2jNIwAU MUSAFAR!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8CrOL-ydFMI This is Water DavidW
Complete Form 1s http://www.silencertalk.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=10&t=79895


Top
   
PostPosted: Mon Jan 07, 2019 11:38 am 
Offline
Silent But Deadly

Joined: Tue Apr 27, 2010 1:52 pm
Posts: 3792
Scumbags tend to be fairly stupid.

When Heller was decided, the morons thought that meant that DC suddenly had Constitutional carry. There was an immediate steep drop in all types of violent crime. As they began to realize that the DC government was still on the criminal's side, violent crime began to rise to normal baseline.

When McDonald was decided, the same thing happened in Chicago.

I am sure Rahm Emmanuel was excited to learn he was wrong in his thinking, and began eagerly pushing for a saner gun policy.

_________________
The moments I was censored was the moment that I won. That's twice, now.Thanks jwbaker, et al, for my victories.


Top
   
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic  Reply to topic  [ 3 posts ] 

All times are UTC-04:00


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 15 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Limited
[ GZIP: Off | Load: 0.71 ]