Buckeye Firearms et al. file lawsuits against antigun ordinances in cities

Links to popular or interesting stories in the news.

Please post links rather than copies of stories due to honoring copyright rules.

Moderators: mpallett, bakerjw, renegade, Hush

Post Reply
johndoe3
Silent But Deadly
Posts: 2710
Joined: Tue Feb 27, 2007 3:02 am
Location: N. Colorado

Buckeye Firearms et al. file lawsuits against antigun ordinances in cities

Post by johndoe3 »

https://www.buckeyefirearms.org/lawsuit ... ump-stocks

Buckeye Firearms and Ohioans for Concealed Carry file lawsuits against the cities of Columbus and Cincinnati for recently passed anti-gun ordinances.
Simultaneous lawsuits were filed on Thursday, June 21, 2018, against the cities of Columbus and Cincinnati over recently introduced ordinances banning the possession, use, or acquisition of so-called "rate-of-fire firearms enhancers," commonly referred to as bump stocks or trigger cranks.

Buckeye Firearms Foundation and Ohioans for Concealed Carry are named as plaintiffs in the cases, citing that these unconstitutional ordinances clearly violate Ohio law.

"Ohio Revised Code 9.68 preempts the home rule powers of municipalities to regulate firearms, their components, and ammo," said Dean Rieck, Executive Director of Buckeye Firearms Association.

"This is important because Ohio used to have a confusing patchwork of gun laws. Merely crossing a city border could turn an otherwise law-abiding citizen into a criminal. More than a decade ago, legislators wisely decided to correct this problem by creating a uniform system of state law and forbidding cities from passing any laws which conflict with those laws."...

...In 2010, the Ohio Supreme Court ruled in a 5-2 opinion that Ohio's "preemption" law is valid. In a case brought by the City of Cleveland against the State of Ohio, the court held that R.C. 9.68 is valid in all respects, including, but not limited to, the mandatory attorney fee provision against any city that attempts to violate a citizen's right to self-defense.

Attorneys for Columbus and Cincinnati rejected demand letters to file for an injunction to prevent the cities from enforcing the ordinances.
Our thanks to these gun groups for holding these errant cities responsible for violating Ohio's preemption laws.

Also, for lobbying against Guv Kasich's anti-gun legislative package and for the Ohio "stand your ground" Bill (Ohio is the only state left with no stand your ground protection by law or court cases).
You can fool all of the people some of the time, and some of the people all of the time...and those are pretty good odds.
Brett Maverick, gambler on TV (also used by Progressive leaders everywhere)
johndoe3
Silent But Deadly
Posts: 2710
Joined: Tue Feb 27, 2007 3:02 am
Location: N. Colorado

Re: Buckeye Firearms et al. file lawsuits against antigun ordinances in cities

Post by johndoe3 »

http://www.dispatch.com/news/20180625/c ... ordinances

A Ohio judge slapped a temporary restraining order on various Columbus anti-gun ordinances pending trial (reasoning that the Ohio preemption law will likely result in Buckeye Firearms and Ohioans for Concealed Carry to prevail at trial). Expect a similar temporary restraining order against Cincinnati anti-gun ordinances.

To win, we need to show up, and Buckeye Firearms and Ohioans for Concealed Carry showed up. thanks
You can fool all of the people some of the time, and some of the people all of the time...and those are pretty good odds.
Brett Maverick, gambler on TV (also used by Progressive leaders everywhere)
Post Reply