General silencer discussion. If you want to talk about a specific silenced rifle or pistol, it is best to do that in the rifle or pistol section for that brand.
Just send the form with Obama 2012 sticker on envelope and include a letter from your state's Democratic Party saying you are great; and then they will sign off in 4-6 months.
If you use a Christmas or Chanuka stamp, your app will probably get "lost" in the mail. Maybe even the Agency's internal mail. They'll cash your check, just lose the app and require a new filing from Step 1!
God help you if you are Republican!!! Get ready for an IRS colonoscopy.
The Darkest Corners of Hell are reserved for those who remain Neutral!-Dante
The Death of One is a Tragedy, a million only a statistic.-Stalin
silencertalk.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=10&t=135314
If ATF is going to even try to look like they're following the rules, there should be nothing from them for quite some time--months at least. They're required to consider and respond to comments on their proposal before publishing a final rule, and even if they disregard all the comments and adopt the rule as proposed it will take quite some time to address the comments.
danb35 wrote:If ATF is going to even try to look like they're following the rules, there should be nothing from them for quite some time--months at least. They're required to consider and respond to comments on their proposal before publishing a final rule, and even if they disregard all the comments and adopt the rule as proposed it will take quite some time to address the comments.
Not quite months, it could be as soon as a couple weeks at the soonest and a month or 2 means they are dragging their feet.
They are only required to read and consider, they don't have to address any of the comments(I have been on that side of a proposal before and just gotta read a selection not even all of the comments).
It will take a day or 2 to weed out the duplicate comments, I found one comment that had been duplicated 894 times, that will reduce the reading a bit for the contractors.
How fast it goes into affect is determined about the person in the oval office pushing this along.
Bendersquint wrote:
How fast it goes into affect is determined about the person in the oval office pushing this along.
That dumb s**t has so much going on right now, that he has probably forgotten about it.
Like living it up at the Mandela send off ...
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BDtd2jNIwAU MUSAFAR!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8CrOL-ydFMI This is Water DavidW
Complete Form 1s http://www.silencertalk.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=10&t=79895
Hells yes!!! What dat fool doin touchin aw over dat fine ass white gurl?
Michelle doesn't even let Obama have alone time w Oprah. You KNOW that Head of State meetings in Europe are just like 'Eyes Wide Shut.'
Let's be honest, if Obama nailed the Danish PM his ratings would go through the roof. Even Congress would be jealous.
The Darkest Corners of Hell are reserved for those who remain Neutral!-Dante
The Death of One is a Tragedy, a million only a statistic.-Stalin
silencertalk.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=10&t=135314
Let's all not forget that Mandela was sent to Prison for possessing with intent to maim and kill, over 48,000 Soviet-made Landmines and I don't recall how many thousands handgrenades.
His wife Winnie was infamous for placing auto tires around peoples' necks, filling them w gasoline, and then setting them on fire. This was known as "necklacing."
"If I was going to commit genocide and then pretend to be a man of peace, this is how I would do it." says Obama.
The Darkest Corners of Hell are reserved for those who remain Neutral!-Dante
The Death of One is a Tragedy, a million only a statistic.-Stalin
silencertalk.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=10&t=135314
danb35 wrote:If ATF is going to even try to look like they're following the rules, there should be nothing from them for quite some time--months at least. They're required to consider and respond to comments on their proposal before publishing a final rule, and even if they disregard all the comments and adopt the rule as proposed it will take quite some time to address the comments.
Not quite months, it could be as soon as a couple weeks at the soonest and a month or 2 means they are dragging their feet.
They are only required to read and consider, they don't have to address any of the comments(I have been on that side of a proposal before and just gotta read a selection not even all of the comments).
It will take a day or 2 to weed out the duplicate comments, I found one comment that had been duplicated 894 times, that will reduce the reading a bit for the contractors.
How fast it goes into affect is determined about the person in the oval office pushing this along.
The proposed rules have some known flaws or gaps in them (e.g., how to handle a change in responsible persons after approval/transfer). The notice even asked for suggestions of how this should be handled. The comments have pointed out several other flaws that make them unworkable as proposed. To enact them as-is is just inviting a successful challenge. If they want to go this direction, but fix these issues first, it would seem they would have to republish the new proposal for another comment period.
It would also be easy for them to do nothing for quite some time, as they have for several years after expressing an intent to "fix" the trust "problem."
Send lawyers, guns, and money...
Armorer-at-Law.com
07FFL/02SOT
Armorer-at-Law wrote:
The proposed rules have some known flaws or gaps in them (e.g., how to handle a change in responsible persons after approval/transfer). The notice even asked for suggestions of how this should be handled. The comments have pointed out several other flaws that make them unworkable as proposed. To enact them as-is is just inviting a successful challenge. If they want to go this direction, but fix these issues first, it would seem they would have to republish the new proposal for another comment period.
It would also be easy for them to do nothing for quite some time, as they have for several years after expressing an intent to "fix" the trust "problem."
Agreed, there are many flaws in it and they know it, I can see another proposal being presented for another round of commenting.
If they just push it through they are looking at more lawsuits than they will be if anything is done with this.
Alot wil depend on the person in the oval office, if he thinks the scare he gave is enough for this time then it may rest if he is deadset on making our lives more miserable then expect a round 2 pretty quick.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BDtd2jNIwAU MUSAFAR!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8CrOL-ydFMI This is Water DavidW
Complete Form 1s http://www.silencertalk.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=10&t=79895
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BDtd2jNIwAU MUSAFAR!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8CrOL-ydFMI This is Water DavidW
Complete Form 1s http://www.silencertalk.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=10&t=79895
