Question about .22 Can
Moderators: mpallett, mr fixit, bakerjw, renegade
- rem_pss308
- Silent But Deadly
- Posts: 157
- Joined: Sat Apr 19, 2008 1:58 am
- Location: North Florida
Question about .22 Can
Im going to be in the market for a .22 can soon. I want one that has very little or none first round pop, and is quiet on a rifle and a Pistol. Weight, Material, and length is not a real factor.
Im not worried of cost. ( buy once, cry once) lmao
I have a form one .22 can already, but its 10" long x 1" with freeze plugs. and it has no first round pop, and is very quiet on both rifle and pistol. On the bolt action. mainly just here firing pin hit.
Is there any cans that meet my specs?
Im not worried of cost. ( buy once, cry once) lmao
I have a form one .22 can already, but its 10" long x 1" with freeze plugs. and it has no first round pop, and is very quiet on both rifle and pistol. On the bolt action. mainly just here firing pin hit.
Is there any cans that meet my specs?
I'll keep my money, My Guns, and My Freedom. You can keep the change !!!!
Re: Question about .22 Can
Silencerco Spectre II or AAC Element2rem_pss308 wrote:Im going to be in the market for a .22 can soon. I want one that has very little or none first round pop, and is quiet on a rifle and a Pistol. Weight, Material, and length is not a real factor.
Im not worried of cost. ( buy once, cry once) lmao
I have a form one .22 can already, but its 10" long x 1" with freeze plugs. and it has no first round pop, and is very quiet on both rifle and pistol. On the bolt action. mainly just here firing pin hit.
Is there any cans that meet my specs?
Kick Ass Design
ten:pm media
www.facebook.com/VisualGravy
ten:pm media
www.facebook.com/VisualGravy
-
- Silent But Deadly
- Posts: 318
- Joined: Thu Oct 30, 2008 5:26 pm
- Location: las vegas nv
Re: Question about .22 Can
Just my $.02Silencerco Spectre II,AAC Element2or liberty essence
Re: Question about .22 Can
AAC Element 2 is what you want. zero first round pop, extremely quiet on rifle and pistol.rem_pss308 wrote:Im going to be in the market for a .22 can soon. I want one that has very little or none first round pop, and is quiet on a rifle and a Pistol. Weight, Material, and length is not a real factor.
Im not worried of cost. ( buy once, cry once) lmao
I have a form one .22 can already, but its 10" long x 1" with freeze plugs. and it has no first round pop, and is very quiet on both rifle and pistol. On the bolt action. mainly just here firing pin hit.
Is there any cans that meet my specs?
- rem_pss308
- Silent But Deadly
- Posts: 157
- Joined: Sat Apr 19, 2008 1:58 am
- Location: North Florida
Re: Question about .22 Can
thanks for responses. looks like the element 2 wins. Hope yall right for the price. LOL
I'll keep my money, My Guns, and My Freedom. You can keep the change !!!!
Re: Question about .22 Can
why discount the Spectre II? At 1:41 in the video you can see that no FRP existed
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NF_xsaJ-iyM
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NF_xsaJ-iyM
- rem_pss308
- Silent But Deadly
- Posts: 157
- Joined: Sat Apr 19, 2008 1:58 am
- Location: North Florida
Re: Question about .22 Can
Same db reduction. Element 2 is shorter and lighter. Yes 200.00 more but its an investment.
I'll keep my money, My Guns, and My Freedom. You can keep the change !!!!
Re: Question about .22 Can
rem_pss308 wrote:Im going to be in the market for a .22 can soon. I want one that has very little or none first round pop, and is quiet on a rifle and a Pistol. Weight, Material, and length is not a real factor.
Im not worried of cost. ( buy once, cry once) lmao
I have a form one .22 can already, but its 10" long x 1" with freeze plugs. and it has no first round pop, and is very quiet on both rifle and pistol. On the bolt action. mainly just here firing pin hit.
Is there any cans that meet my specs?
You said weight and length aren't factors?
Spectre II would be my choice.
Re: Question about .22 Can
All three cans mentioned are spectacular. The element and essence are more costly and of those two I would take the essence(it's clear where the extra expense is MATERIAL!). For the price the SpectreII is tough to beat!
Matt
Form4
01 FFL / 03 SOT
(631) 721-6201
http://form4.org/
Form4
01 FFL / 03 SOT
(631) 721-6201
http://form4.org/
- rem_pss308
- Silent But Deadly
- Posts: 157
- Joined: Sat Apr 19, 2008 1:58 am
- Location: North Florida
Re: Question about .22 Can
Length and weight are Low factors. but if both have no FRP and both are very quiet (same DB) then shorter and lighter can be factors.
Still considering both. have to see what is available here in Florida.
Still considering both. have to see what is available here in Florida.
I'll keep my money, My Guns, and My Freedom. You can keep the change !!!!
- rem_pss308
- Silent But Deadly
- Posts: 157
- Joined: Sat Apr 19, 2008 1:58 am
- Location: North Florida
Re: Question about .22 Can
liberty essence: what about first round pop? I sen how quiet it was. but is it as quiet and the other two?
I'll keep my money, My Guns, and My Freedom. You can keep the change !!!!
Re: Question about .22 Can
i have my doubts the monocore essence is quieter than the k baffle element 2.rem_pss308 wrote:liberty essence: what about first round pop? I sen how quiet it was. but is it as quiet and the other two?
-
- Silent But Deadly
- Posts: 318
- Joined: Thu Oct 30, 2008 5:26 pm
- Location: las vegas nv
Re: Question about .22 Can
Anybody in or around vegas have an element2?
I would be glad to have a shoot out. I am curious myself.
I would be glad to have a shoot out. I am curious myself.
Re: Question about .22 Can
I have a element and liberty TL , the TL is more quiet on rifle and less blowback but bigger/ more volume, the Element is a great pistol can and best for short and light on pistol. The TL sound about as good on pistol.
The SWR Spectre II is a great can and I would buy it if needing another! It's the easiest to clean (tube stays clean) also best price and great service and looking at tests most quit on pistol.
You won't " cry " with any new SWR, any 3 is good but 22 cans get dirty fast so think cleaning too.
The SWR Spectre II is a great can and I would buy it if needing another! It's the easiest to clean (tube stays clean) also best price and great service and looking at tests most quit on pistol.
You won't " cry " with any new SWR, any 3 is good but 22 cans get dirty fast so think cleaning too.
Member of the LSU, SWR, and RUGGED underground. Shame Silencerco!
Re: Question about .22 Can
All modern quality 22LR cans meter well below 120db. So performance-wise, it's like splitting hairs.
Focus instead on what 22LR is famous for and is unavoidable...dirty, heavy lead buildup! Ease of cleaning should be #1 priority IMO.
Sparrow and Spectre II are both stainless, but Spectre breaks down into 11 pieces with a tool, while Sparrow breaks down into just 5 pieces with no tools.
No FRP on rifles with the Sparrow, but it happens on pistols. But depending on your particular pistol, sometimes there's no FRP or is just negligible.
I vote Sparrow. It's also the shortest 22 can on the market, just 5.08"
Focus instead on what 22LR is famous for and is unavoidable...dirty, heavy lead buildup! Ease of cleaning should be #1 priority IMO.
Sparrow and Spectre II are both stainless, but Spectre breaks down into 11 pieces with a tool, while Sparrow breaks down into just 5 pieces with no tools.
No FRP on rifles with the Sparrow, but it happens on pistols. But depending on your particular pistol, sometimes there's no FRP or is just negligible.
I vote Sparrow. It's also the shortest 22 can on the market, just 5.08"
Re: Question about .22 Can
Without a meter it is anecdotal but it has been said that varying the twist of the barrelrimshaker wrote:All modern quality 22LR cans meter well below 120db. So performance-wise, it's like splitting hairs.
Focus instead on what 22LR is famous for and is unavoidable...dirty, heavy lead buildup! Ease of cleaning should be #1 priority IMO.
Sparrow and Spectre II are both stainless, but Spectre breaks down into 11 pieces with a tool, while Sparrow breaks down into just 5 pieces with no tools.
No FRP on rifles with the Sparrow, but it happens on pistols. But depending on your particular pistol, sometimes there's no FRP or is just negligible.
I vote Sparrow. It's also the shortest 22 can on the market, just 5.08"
has been perceived to correlate with a varying of FRP on a .22 pistol.
A not often mentioned third order parameter that might be considered for an actual test.
Re: Question about .22 Can
The FRP with the Sparrow on a pistol can easily be avoided with a quick spritz of water from a nasal spray bottle.
- whiterussian1974
- Silent But Deadly
- Posts: 2857
- Joined: Sat Sep 28, 2013 11:37 pm
- Location: On 8th line of eye chart.
Re: Question about .22 Can
Historian: What twist would help? Most barrels are 1:16. I saw one for 1:9 specially made for 60gr Aguilla. I don't know if it would overstabilize a Winchester M22 40gr @ 1255fps?
I never even considered rust being a problem from combustion byproducts until I read about it in a thread yesterday. Grease would seem to be of obvious assistance w that too.
I've also used a straw to place distilled water along the baffle stack after several shots have heated the can and softened/evaporated much of the grease. (I only add grease when I can run a jag down the bore to make sure of no strikes.)
Great idea! I don't know why so many posters are against lithium grease in centerfire blast chambers. It's the only way that I have ever shot.Abiqua wrote:The FRP with the Sparrow on a pistol can easily be avoided with a quick spritz of water from a nasal spray bottle.
I never even considered rust being a problem from combustion byproducts until I read about it in a thread yesterday. Grease would seem to be of obvious assistance w that too.
I've also used a straw to place distilled water along the baffle stack after several shots have heated the can and softened/evaporated much of the grease. (I only add grease when I can run a jag down the bore to make sure of no strikes.)
The Darkest Corners of Hell are reserved for those who remain Neutral!-Dante
The Death of One is a Tragedy, a million only a statistic.-Stalin
silencertalk.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=10&t=135314
The Death of One is a Tragedy, a million only a statistic.-Stalin
silencertalk.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=10&t=135314
Re: Question about .22 Can
rem_pss308 wrote:Same db reduction. Element 2 is shorter and lighter. Yes 200.00 more but its an investment.
The real consideration between the two is ease of cleaning, and the Spectre II wins hands down.
SWR 556 Specwar, 762 Specwar, Octane 45HD, Spectre II; SilencerCo Osprey 45, Omega; AAC Pilot, 300TM; Ruger AC556
Rugged Oculus; Dead Air Sandman K
Rugged Oculus; Dead Air Sandman K
Re: Question about .22 Can
kassenz wrote:Spit.
Re: Question about .22 Can
Because its a mess and no need on the good new cans.whiterussian1974 wrote:Historian: What twist would help? Most barrels are 1:16. I saw one for 1:9 specially made for 60gr Aguilla. I don't know if it would overstabilize a Winchester M22 40gr @ 1255fps?Abiqua wrote:The FRP with the Sparrow on a pistol can easily be avoided with a quick spritz of water from a nasal spray bottle.Old idea, as old as the sparrow.Great idea!
I don't know why so many posters are against lithium grease in centerfire blast chambers. It's the only way that I have ever shot.
I never even considered rust being a problem from combustion byproducts until I read about it in a thread yesterday. Grease would seem to be of obvious assistance w that too.
I've also used a straw to place distilled water along the baffle stack after several shots have heated the can and softened/evaporated much of the grease. (I only add grease when I can run a jag down the bore to make sure of no strikes.)
Member of the LSU, SWR, and RUGGED underground. Shame Silencerco!
Re: Question about .22 Can
Less pieces don't mean easier to clean, with the Spectre you have no half shells or gap residue and the pieces sonic and water tumble easier.rimshaker wrote:All modern quality 22LR cans meter well below 120db. So performance-wise, it's like splitting hairs.
Focus instead on what 22LR is famous for and is unavoidable...dirty, heavy lead buildup! Ease of cleaning should be #1 priority IMO.
Sparrow and Spectre II are both stainless, but Spectre breaks down into 11 pieces with a tool, while Sparrow breaks down into just 5 pieces with no tools.
No FRP on rifles with the Sparrow, but it happens on pistols. But depending on your particular pistol, sometimes there's no FRP or is just negligible.
I vote Sparrow. It's also the shortest 22 can on the market, just 5.08"
The sparrow sounds better on rifle but the Specter better on pistol so something for him to think about. Most anything on rifle sound "ok" but then blow back comes into play fouling semi rifle mags and this is where the liberty shines and no FRP.
I remember Major malfunctions side kick ( moderator) blaming Ruger 10/22 X mags for being " junk" when doing a sparrow report and we all know how good those mags are.
So things to consider but yes cleaning is huge and SS cores huge when buying 22 cans. How many seconds to take one apart not so huge if you factor other needs.
Member of the LSU, SWR, and RUGGED underground. Shame Silencerco!
- whiterussian1974
- Silent But Deadly
- Posts: 2857
- Joined: Sat Sep 28, 2013 11:37 pm
- Location: On 8th line of eye chart.
Re: Question about .22 Can
I'm about to be serious, not sarcastic.Emilio wrote:Because its a mess and no need on the good new cans.whiterussian1974 wrote:I don't know why so many posters are against lithium grease in centerfire blast chambers. It's the only way that I have ever shot.
I never even considered rust being a problem from combustion byproducts until I read about it in a thread yesterday. Grease would seem to be of obvious assistance w that too.
I've also used a straw to place distilled water along the baffle stack after several shots have heated the can and softened/evaporated much of the grease. (I only add grease when I can run a jag down the bore to make sure of no strikes.)
Not needed doesn't = best. I use Li grease to lube my car's undercarriage. Strictly speaking, not needed, but far better than w/o.
I guess I am just always looking to improve performance, rather than settling for good enough.
The Darkest Corners of Hell are reserved for those who remain Neutral!-Dante
The Death of One is a Tragedy, a million only a statistic.-Stalin
silencertalk.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=10&t=135314
The Death of One is a Tragedy, a million only a statistic.-Stalin
silencertalk.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=10&t=135314
Re: Question about .22 Can
Emilio wrote:Less pieces don't mean easier to clean, with the Spectre you have no half shells or gap residue and the pieces sonic and water tumble easier.rimshaker wrote:All modern quality 22LR cans meter well below 120db. So performance-wise, it's like splitting hairs.
Focus instead on what 22LR is famous for and is unavoidable...dirty, heavy lead buildup! Ease of cleaning should be #1 priority IMO.
Sparrow and Spectre II are both stainless, but Spectre breaks down into 11 pieces with a tool, while Sparrow breaks down into just 5 pieces with no tools.
No FRP on rifles with the Sparrow, but it happens on pistols. But depending on your particular pistol, sometimes there's no FRP or is just negligible.
I vote Sparrow. It's also the shortest 22 can on the market, just 5.08"
The sparrow sounds better on rifle but the Specter better on pistol so something for him to think about. Most anything on rifle sound "ok" but then blow back comes into play fouling semi rifle mags and this is where the liberty shines and no FRP.
I remember Major malfunctions side kick ( moderator) blaming Ruger 10/22 X mags for being " junk" when doing a sparrow report and we all know how good those mags are.
So things to consider but yes cleaning is huge and SS cores huge when buying 22 cans. How many seconds to take one apart not so huge if you factor other needs.
Well said, I like my SS Sparrow, and Love my Spectre II. It build like a tank. Most important is servicebility and warrenty. If I have only one choice, It will be Spectre II.