Stand alone recoil regulator

[STL/N.E.R.D.S.]

Just curious if any manufacturers make a stand alone 1/2x28 to 1/2x28 recoil regulator like AWC did in the past.

[mpallett]

Just curious if any manufacturers make a stand alone 1/2x28 to 1/2x28 recoil regulator like AWC did in the past.

I don't think so.

I want one.

[STL/N.E.R.D.S.]

There is a market for these, they do work, aren't a serialized part, and yes I want one too, that's why I asked.. any info on tracking one down would be appreciated..

[twodollarbill]

If you have a lathe, they are very easy to make.

[STL/N.E.R.D.S.]

How about hookin a brother up!! I am lathe poor..

[sumkrnboy]

viewtopic.php?f=10&t=119242

[L1A1Rocker]

If you have a lathe, they are very easy to make.

Have any sketches or plans? I'm not real sure what they look like on the inside. . .

[Bendersquint]

Noone makes them now.

I sent the ATF one of sumrkn's pictures and was told that as that drawing is done it could be considered a silencer part.

They sent me a picture of the AWC regulator from their archive's and said they USED to allow this but haven't considered them adapters in years and that is why its not for sale anymore.

This is a consistent response with another design we submitted to them that got the same reply.

If Sumrkn gets a favorable response I look forward to seeing it as it will set a nice precedence for us to go back at the ATF with.

[mpallett]

Noone makes them now.

I sent the ATF one of sumrkn's pictures and was told that as that drawing is done it could be considered a silencer part.

They sent me a picture of the AWC regulator from their archive's and said they USED to allow this but haven't considered them adapters in years and that is why its not for sale anymore.

This is a consistent response with another design we submitted to them that got the same reply.

If Sumrkn gets a favorable response I look forward to seeing it as it will set a nice precedence for us to go back at the ATF with.

My match race gun with my 3 lb brake needs a booster so my gun will work.

[sumkrnboy]

Noone makes them now.

I sent the ATF one of sumrkn's pictures and was told that as that drawing is done it could be considered a silencer part.

They sent me a picture of the AWC regulator from their archive's and said they USED to allow this but haven't considered them adapters in years and that is why its not for sale anymore.

This is a consistent response with another design we submitted to them that got the same reply.

If Sumrkn gets a favorable response I look forward to seeing it as it will set a nice precedence for us to go back at the ATF with.

My match race gun with my 3 lb brake needs a booster so my gun will work.

That was one of the points I brought up in the letter to the ATF FTB. It has other uses besides being used with a silencer.

[Bendersquint]

That was one of the points I brought up in the letter to the ATF FTB. It has other uses besides being used with a silencer.

Like what other uses??

You do realize that to say it has other uses you have to demonstrate and prove the need if you are fighting for a non-regulated part classification.

[twodollarbill]

If you have a lathe, they are very easy to make.

Have any sketches or plans? I'm not real sure what they look like on the inside. . .

I had posted this pic in another thread.

[sumkrnboy]

That was one of the points I brought up in the letter to the ATF FTB. It has other uses besides being used with a silencer.

Like what other uses??

You do realize that to say it has other uses you have to demonstrate and prove the need if you are fighting for a non-regulated part classification.

Allow the use of heavy muzzle devices such as muzzle brakes, flash hiders, blank adapters, etc. by allowing the tilting barrel action to cycle.

[Bendersquint]

That was one of the points I brought up in the letter to the ATF FTB. It has other uses besides being used with a silencer.

Like what other uses??

You do realize that to say it has other uses you have to demonstrate and prove the need if you are fighting for a non-regulated part classification.

Allow the use of heavy muzzle devices such as muzzle brakes, flash hiders, blank adapters, etc. by allowing the tilting barrel action to cycle.

Your reasons remind me of what Slide Fire used to get the ATF approval for their stocks.

[sumkrnboy]

That was one of the points I brought up in the letter to the ATF FTB. It has other uses besides being used with a silencer.

Like what other uses??

You do realize that to say it has other uses you have to demonstrate and prove the need if you are fighting for a non-regulated part classification.

Would you like a copy of what I wrote to the FTB?

So far, I've had a favorable determination with every letter I've sent them.

[Bendersquint]

That was one of the points I brought up in the letter to the ATF FTB. It has other uses besides being used with a silencer.

Like what other uses??

You do realize that to say it has other uses you have to demonstrate and prove the need if you are fighting for a non-regulated part classification.

Would you like a copy of what I wrote to the FTB?

So far, I've had a favorable determination with every letter I've sent them.

Dan

Sure.