JeffWard wrote:Ruger 22/45 LITE. Mine is awesome... Can on the way. Put your thumb behind the slide to make it into a single-shot, and you have a back-yard suburban plinker.
300BLK. This round was DESIGNED to be suppressed. Shoot 220gr bullets from an AR-15 for the cost of ONLY the barrel... Good ones are as low as $150.
JeffWard
I've read up on the .300blk today and looks pretty tempting. How does it sound compared to a suppressed .223? The best I could find is a youtube video that make them sound neck and neck.
ncorry wrote:I like the Beretta 22- I think it's a 21, but not made anymore. For the price of it, you could get a good Ruger MKII or 22/45 LITE. I've got the MKII with a TacSol aluminum upper and it is my favorite host period. A buddy has the LITE and it is a very nice 22 pistol. I've probably got close to $700 in the MKII, and the 22/45 is around $300 I think. Not $400 worth of difference, but they didn't have the LITE when I got the MKII. I;ve been looking at the GSG 1911 and the Sig 22 1911 too.
For the 7.62 can, yeah, take a look at the 300BLK, either with an AR barrel ($80- $300) or a Handi Rifle ($250-$300) or even the Micro 7. All are proven performers with the 300BLK. Just make sure you get a 1:8 or 1:7 twist.
For the 45 can- I;ve got a Handi Rifle in 357 that is absolutely mouse fart quiet with a 9mm can. I've seen some folks threading Ruger 77/357 and 77/44 rifles lately. I have an integral 77/44 and it is almost as quiet as the 357 Handi when throwing 300 grain Hornady XTPs at 1050 fps.
My recommendations, in order, are 22/45 LITE, 77/44, 300BLK Handi.
Everyone seems to be in favor of the 22/45
I used to have a little Beretta .32 Tomcat. It's a bit cliche, but I do have an urge to get some Hollywood / 007 style setup. I guess that's where the Beretta 71 comes into play. If I went with a .32 or .380, I think that'd be another suppressor.
thecameraman79 wrote:I agree with Jeff. Ruger 22/45 lite is the way to go. I was at a friends bachelor party this weekend and there were guns everywhere. I think everyone decided it was there favorite gun of the day with an element 2 on the end. Big burly men were chosing the Ruger 22/45 with the element 2 over a 1911 with a tirant 45, 300 blackout with a SDN-6, MP5K (semi) with octane 9. Its a ton of fun. I still prefer my integral 10/22 over it but it's definitely on the top in my book and cheap to shoot.
I think a .22 would get the most action. One of my justifications to jump in was to get a .22 for the squirrels and invasive birds in the backyard. The .45 and 7.62 will have to be range only toys.
doubloon wrote:gicts wrote:... I have a MKII, and it's nice and does shoot well, but it doesn't seem too ergonomic.
...
What is it you don't like about the Ruger you already own? Maybe something else can be suggested based on your needs.
Well this will make some Ruger fans shutter ... It's actually a 1976 MKI and the least shot in my collection. Sure, it's pretty accurate, it just doesn't handle well. There's a narrow grip, horribly unbalanced, and every time I look at it I see a hobbled together Nambu wannabe.
sillycon wrote:Emilio wrote:I ordered a Swanson barrel for cheap but couldn't trust it ( sloppy fit, crude, iffy threading to bore) I am very happy with my $200 threaded storm lake and Octane, the semi fit barrel is tight and very accurate.
The finish on the Swenson is crude, no doubt. I've not shot it on paper, but 8" plates at 40yd are no issue so long as I do my part so regardless of it not being "pretty" it does what it is supposed to do. Lock up was nice, and the barrel has enough meat that it can be setup to ride on the lugs (unlike many expensive factory guns which have to ride the link...

). I didn't measure concentricity directly (I verified there was free space around the baffles with a rod down the bore), but a sample size of one wouldn't mean much any way.
If you're expecting $300 in fit and finish, you'll be disappointed. If you just want a threaded barrel that puts rounds down range with reasonable accuracy and not a big-money price, the Swenson is worth a look.
Unfortunately, with 1911-pattern guns, the manufacturing variances are pretty wild sometimes so it's a bit of a crap shoot as to how tight/loose it will fit on any particular gun. Also, note that the Swenson barrel will NOT work on a Para or other gun with integrated feed ramps and such.
I think I'll give it a go. For $100 for a barrel, housing, and thread cover, do I have that much to lose?