Optimum muzzle velocity for subs?
Moderators: mpallett, mr fixit, bakerjw, renegade
Optimum muzzle velocity for subs?
When loading your own subs, what muzzle velocity should you shoot for to keep it subsonic?
You read a lot about how 1050 fps is the best, but can you push it a little faster depending on elevation and outside temperature?
Knowing that the speed of sound is 1125 fps at sea level, how close can you push it?
You read a lot about how 1050 fps is the best, but can you push it a little faster depending on elevation and outside temperature?
Knowing that the speed of sound is 1125 fps at sea level, how close can you push it?
- CanOfWhooppass
- Silent But Deadly
- Posts: 482
- Joined: Thu Dec 10, 2015 3:03 pm
- Location: South Florida
Re: Optimum muzzle velocity for subs?
What is the goal?
My understanding is slower is quieter with all else being equal.
If it's terminal performance it mostly matters that you start with a good bullet design and stay within its designed velocity range.
If it's knocking down plates it is more bullet weight.
If it's distance then balistic coefficient matters most.
I doubt an extra 50 fps would change anything in a meaningful way.
My understanding is slower is quieter with all else being equal.
If it's terminal performance it mostly matters that you start with a good bullet design and stay within its designed velocity range.
If it's knocking down plates it is more bullet weight.
If it's distance then balistic coefficient matters most.
I doubt an extra 50 fps would change anything in a meaningful way.
It's not a silencer, it's a can of whoopass!
Re: Optimum muzzle velocity for subs?
The goal is to get as fast as possible without getting a supersonic crack. This will be on a big bore setup, so I'm wanting to move the giant bullets as fast as I can without getting the supersonic crack, so I'll still stay super quiet through the can.
Re: Optimum muzzle velocity for subs?
Mine run about 1020 and don't go trans sonic regardless of conditions.
Re: Optimum muzzle velocity for subs?
There is no real optimum speed, slower will always be more quiet:
The reason for this is that air flow around the bullet will be higher than it's actual velocity, so even if you stay below the speed of sound the flow around the bullet may exceed it. This is the trans-sonic range. As you can see the noise really increases more rapidly at around 300-320m/s, so most people choose this range.
The reason for this is that air flow around the bullet will be higher than it's actual velocity, so even if you stay below the speed of sound the flow around the bullet may exceed it. This is the trans-sonic range. As you can see the noise really increases more rapidly at around 300-320m/s, so most people choose this range.
- L1A1Rocker
- Silent But Deadly
- Posts: 3578
- Joined: Wed Feb 21, 2007 5:40 pm
- Location: Texas Hill Country
Re: Optimum muzzle velocity for subs?
The bullet is also rather unstable in the trans-sonic stage. Accuracy is not so good. The 1050 goal is a bit dated. Most now shoot for 1010.
- Joshua@CapitolArmory
- Senior Silent Operator
- Posts: 120
- Joined: Wed Feb 11, 2015 2:38 pm
- Contact:
Re: Optimum muzzle velocity for subs?
I may be the exception to what most guys do, but I don't load for speed with subs. I get a general range of, then work up based on accuracy. I'll usually start to see the groups open up before it gets into trans/super territory... so if I push 990-1010 and accuracy is great then I'm happy with it.
It's a sub, so I would rather take that then trying to squeeze out the maximum velocity. Of course you can go overboard trying to get the exact velocity you want and peak accuracy there, but that's too much work for me. I just want some accuracy and quiet 208 AMAX loads to ring steel with.
It's a sub, so I would rather take that then trying to squeeze out the maximum velocity. Of course you can go overboard trying to get the exact velocity you want and peak accuracy there, but that's too much work for me. I just want some accuracy and quiet 208 AMAX loads to ring steel with.
Re: Optimum muzzle velocity for subs?
Elevation has very little effect on the speed of sound. Humidity had a little, but the biggest factor is temperature. At 100 degrees the speed of sound is 1160 fps and at 0 degrees it's 1050 fps.BlakeJ wrote:Knowing that the speed of sound is 1125 fps at sea level, how close can you push it?
- T-Rex
- Silent But Deadly
- Posts: 1865
- Joined: Wed Oct 29, 2014 3:38 pm
- Location: CT - The AntiConstitution State
Re: Optimum muzzle velocity for subs?
AgreedJoshua@CapitolArmory wrote: so if I push 990-1010 and accuracy is great then I'm happy with it.
I aim for 950, with initial loading, and try to bracket around this velocity to get my accuracy node.
Completed Builds www.silencertalk.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=79895
Burst Calculator www.engineersedge.com/calculators/pipe_bust_calc.htm
Silencer Porn www.instagram.com/explore/tags/silencerporn/
Burst Calculator www.engineersedge.com/calculators/pipe_bust_calc.htm
Silencer Porn www.instagram.com/explore/tags/silencerporn/
- whiterussian1974
- Silent But Deadly
- Posts: 2857
- Joined: Sat Sep 28, 2013 11:37 pm
- Location: On 8th line of eye chart.
Re: Optimum muzzle velocity for subs?
You're right. Unless someone plans a hunt from K2 or during descent from a plane @ 10k', altitude doesn't matter much for 99.8% of people living below Silverton or Blue River, CO.Gyrkin wrote:Elevation has very little effect on the speed of sound. Humidity had a little, but the biggest factor is temperature. At 100 degrees the speed of sound is 1160 fps and at 0 degrees it's 1050 fps.BlakeJ wrote:Knowing that the speed of sound is 1125 fps at sea level, how close can you push it?
If planning a hunt in Peruvian Andes, I would develop my load locally. Otherwise, Joshua's post about accuracy is the best advice. It is a great indicator of transonic turbulence.
The Darkest Corners of Hell are reserved for those who remain Neutral!-Dante
The Death of One is a Tragedy, a million only a statistic.-Stalin
silencertalk.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=10&t=135314
The Death of One is a Tragedy, a million only a statistic.-Stalin
silencertalk.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=10&t=135314
Re: Optimum muzzle velocity for subs?
Does bullet size help any with trans sonic accuracy? I would think the bigger the bullet the less it would effect it, but I could be wrong.
Re: Optimum muzzle velocity for subs?
Sub is sub. Optimum to me means remaining subsonic across a wide temp range. Whether you're shooting in MN during winter, or in FL during summer.
- Capt. Link.
- Silent But Deadly
- Posts: 2829
- Joined: Wed Oct 17, 2007 9:05 pm
- Location: USA.
Re: Optimum muzzle velocity for subs?
The range of 900-950 fps is used by pro's including our military.Target grade ammo is in the same range.
-CL
-CL
The only reason after 243 years the government now wants to disarm you is they intend to do something you would shoot them for!
http://www.silencertalk.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=10&t=79895
http://www.silencertalk.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=10&t=79895
Re: Optimum muzzle velocity for subs?
That would keep is subsonic all the way down to -85 F. Cold even by Wyoming standards.Capt. Link. wrote:The range of 900-950 fps is used by pro's including our military.Target grade ammo is in the same range.
Re: Optimum muzzle velocity for subs?
I'll do some tinkering. It's about a 20% energy difference per 100 fps.
-
- New Member
- Posts: 8
- Joined: Wed May 28, 2014 10:11 pm
Re: Optimum muzzle velocity for subs?
..
Last edited by TheSpaniard on Fri Oct 26, 2018 3:05 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- whiterussian1974
- Silent But Deadly
- Posts: 2857
- Joined: Sat Sep 28, 2013 11:37 pm
- Location: On 8th line of eye chart.
Re: Optimum muzzle velocity for subs?
985'/s w/ 80 Extreme Spread and 35 Standard Deviation should be fine. These are more reasonable figures for most loaders.
40/10 is pretty tight unless you've got a large powder capacity and 103-108 load density. (Slightly compressed)
40/10 is pretty tight unless you've got a large powder capacity and 103-108 load density. (Slightly compressed)
The Darkest Corners of Hell are reserved for those who remain Neutral!-Dante
The Death of One is a Tragedy, a million only a statistic.-Stalin
silencertalk.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=10&t=135314
The Death of One is a Tragedy, a million only a statistic.-Stalin
silencertalk.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=10&t=135314
- Capt. Link.
- Silent But Deadly
- Posts: 2829
- Joined: Wed Oct 17, 2007 9:05 pm
- Location: USA.
Re: Optimum muzzle velocity for subs?
That speed range accounts for all the variables plus loss of life if a bullet goes transonic.Gyrkin wrote:That would keep is subsonic all the way down to -85 F. Cold even by Wyoming standards.Capt. Link. wrote:The range of 900-950 fps is used by pro's including our military.Target grade ammo is in the same range.
Accurate shot placement and deep penetration counts.
-CL
The only reason after 243 years the government now wants to disarm you is they intend to do something you would shoot them for!
http://www.silencertalk.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=10&t=79895
http://www.silencertalk.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=10&t=79895
Re: Optimum muzzle velocity for subs?
Yep. I have some subsonic ammo that was going super on me a while back when it normally never would. I was at 10,000 ft. altitude. I live close to 5000 ft., and usually temp will swing it a bit as I head up the canyons, but you add the temp altitude and it's definitely a factor some of us deal with.whiterussian1974 wrote:You're right. Unless someone plans a hunt from K2 or during descent from a plane @ 10k', altitude doesn't matter much for 99.8% of people living below Silverton or Blue River, CO.Gyrkin wrote:Elevation has very little effect on the speed of sound. Humidity had a little, but the biggest factor is temperature. At 100 degrees the speed of sound is 1160 fps and at 0 degrees it's 1050 fps.BlakeJ wrote:Knowing that the speed of sound is 1125 fps at sea level, how close can you push it?
If planning a hunt in Peruvian Andes, I would develop my load locally. Otherwise, Joshua's post about accuracy is the best advice. It is a great indicator of transonic turbulence.
I'm all for the advice from Josh to start low and work up based on accuracy.
Re: Optimum muzzle velocity for subs?
I don't think 10,000 feet would be high enough to make a noticeable difference. Plus, if I'm not mistaken the high altitude would increase the speed of sound, because of the thinner air, and therefore make it easier to keep under it. But even then altitude has very little effect on speed of sound, temperature has a big effect. If it was colder up there at 10,000 feet, that was the reason, not the altitude.Mageever wrote:Yep. I have some subsonic ammo that was going super on me a while back when it normally never would. I was at 10,000 ft. altitude.
- whiterussian1974
- Silent But Deadly
- Posts: 2857
- Joined: Sat Sep 28, 2013 11:37 pm
- Location: On 8th line of eye chart.
Re: Optimum muzzle velocity for subs?
You're both correct. The drop in Temp is coupled to the rise in Alt. (Lapse Rate)
http://www.onthesnow.com/news/a/15157/a ... mperature-"Thus meaning it's a change of 6 degrees Celsius per 1,0000 meters.) ... change * 3.3F per 1,000ft, or 3 * 3.3 = about 10F temperature decrease)"
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lapse_rate
"under normal atmospheric conditions the average atmospheric lapse rate results in a temperature decrease of 6.4 °C/km (3.5 °F or 1.95 °C/1,000 ft)"
"(3.56 °F or 1.98 K/1,000 ft from sea level to 11 km (36,090 ft or 6.8 mi)) . From 11 km up to 20 km (65,620 ft or 12.4 mi), the constant temperature is −56.5 °C (−69.7 °F)"
http://www.onthesnow.com/news/a/15157/a ... mperature-"Thus meaning it's a change of 6 degrees Celsius per 1,0000 meters.) ... change * 3.3F per 1,000ft, or 3 * 3.3 = about 10F temperature decrease)"
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lapse_rate
"under normal atmospheric conditions the average atmospheric lapse rate results in a temperature decrease of 6.4 °C/km (3.5 °F or 1.95 °C/1,000 ft)"
"(3.56 °F or 1.98 K/1,000 ft from sea level to 11 km (36,090 ft or 6.8 mi)) . From 11 km up to 20 km (65,620 ft or 12.4 mi), the constant temperature is −56.5 °C (−69.7 °F)"
The Darkest Corners of Hell are reserved for those who remain Neutral!-Dante
The Death of One is a Tragedy, a million only a statistic.-Stalin
silencertalk.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=10&t=135314
The Death of One is a Tragedy, a million only a statistic.-Stalin
silencertalk.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=10&t=135314
Re: Optimum muzzle velocity for subs?
this is dependent on bullet design. there are bullets which are specifically designed to be 100% stable through transonic range.L1A1Rocker wrote:The bullet is also rather unstable in the trans-sonic stage. Accuracy is not so good. The 1050 goal is a bit dated. Most now shoot for 1010.
- L1A1Rocker
- Silent But Deadly
- Posts: 3578
- Joined: Wed Feb 21, 2007 5:40 pm
- Location: Texas Hill Country
Re: Optimum muzzle velocity for subs?
Cool, which ones are those? I'd love to get some.bani wrote:this is dependent on bullet design. there are bullets which are specifically designed to be 100% stable through transonic range.L1A1Rocker wrote:The bullet is also rather unstable in the trans-sonic stage. Accuracy is not so good. The 1050 goal is a bit dated. Most now shoot for 1010.
Re: Optimum muzzle velocity for subs?
bryan litz created bullets for berger that are explicitly designed to be transonic stable.L1A1Rocker wrote:Cool, which ones are those? I'd love to get some.bani wrote:this is dependent on bullet design. there are bullets which are specifically designed to be 100% stable through transonic range.L1A1Rocker wrote:The bullet is also rather unstable in the trans-sonic stage. Accuracy is not so good. The 1050 goal is a bit dated. Most now shoot for 1010.
http://www.longrangehunting.com/forums/ ... post494399
- L1A1Rocker
- Silent But Deadly
- Posts: 3578
- Joined: Wed Feb 21, 2007 5:40 pm
- Location: Texas Hill Country
Re: Optimum muzzle velocity for subs?
bryan litz created bullets for berger that are explicitly designed to be transonic stable.bani wrote:
Cool, which ones are those? I'd love to get some.
http://www.longrangehunting.com/forums/ ... post494399[/quote]
Tried to check it out following the link at the link you posted and got this:
Just to be clear, a bullet that is being claimed to trans-sonic stable sounds like snake oil to me. And that dangerous site seems to point that direction also.Dangerous Website Blocked
You attempted to access:
http://appliedballisticsllc.com/TacticalAmmo.html
This is a known dangerous website. It is recommended that you do NOT visit this site. The detailed report explains the security risks on this site.
For your protection, this web page has been blocked. Visit Symantec to learn more about phishing and internet security.
Do you or anyone you can link to have any first hand experience with these bullets?