Just saw these guys on my instagram feed. I think they are going to sell A lot of them.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bYTn4ho91vs

+1!

More power to new young innovators.

Clever 'No Tube' design. No stuck baffles.

Any videos of shooting with a .22?

Much success to them!

Damn. Time to ante up for another tax stamp!

BlogSarge wrote:Damn. Time to ante up for another tax stamp!

what I was thinking!

Historian wrote:+1!

More power to new young innovators.

Clever 'No Tube' design. No stuck baffles.

Any videos of shooting with a .22?

Much success to them!

I dont know I'd subscribe to their YT channel and wait for their videos.

Pass.

Why would anyone buy one of these before extensive video of testing is shown? I'd like to see the thing not unscrew.

They recommend a crush washer
Did I hear that right?

Isn't is interesting that they come out with this just as H&K's patent for the same thing expires?

https://www.google.com/patents/US5679916

jreinke wrote:Isn't is interesting that they come out with this just as H&K's patent for the same thing expires?

https://www.google.com/patents/US5679916

It is funny to me because we have been making our suppressors like this for 3 years with the exception we put a tube over the baffles. The threaded together core is nothing new and it takes a lot to get it right.

How many rounds until baffles scatter downrange?

I would also be worried they would get to tight and no way to loosen them.

Not sure, I'm starting to get tired of crazy claims in the industry.

+1 Joker.

I think the brilliance of Brittingham, Graham, and Pappas would probably have found out by now if something truly innovative were out there. They have all been through multiple ventures and had the opportunity to do what could be done.

At just under 1.5" diameter not sure what just under means but I bet this thing will meter over 140 and probably close to 145.

They are claiming 33 dB reduction. Besides, most cans are 1.5" right? 21 ounces though, not light at all.

They were using a marketing meter (a digital Larson Davis). Not useful for genuine silencer testing. The design won't hold up to any serious fire schedule. Aren't these the same people making a $99 rimfire suppressor? Use a crush washer? Perhaps the Yugo of silencers has arrived...

John Titsworth wrote:They were using a marketing meter (a digital Larson Davis). Not useful for genuine silencer testing. The design won't hold up to any serious fire schedule. Aren't these the same people making a $99 rimfire suppressor? Use a crush washer? Perhaps the Yugo of silencers has arrived...

Yes, the same people.

krowpots wrote:Why would anyone buy one of these before extensive video of testing is shown? I'd like to see the thing not unscrew.

THIS!

I have an A-TEC CMM4(6) which is a similar design. It has had 10,000 rounds through it (.22LR) and the sections have not come loose.

i dont see why these would unscrew. does your silencer randomly unscrew from your barrel while firing? how bout the endcaps, do those randomly fall off during shooting? why would these be any different? torque them down well and since they're a homogeneous material, as they heat up, they expand uniformly with each other.