Petition to remove silencers from NFA.

General silencer discussion. If you want to talk about a specific silenced rifle or pistol, it is best to do that in the rifle or pistol section for that brand.

All NFA laws apply.

Moderators: mpallett, mr fixit, bakerjw, renegade

User avatar
Abiqua
Silent But Deadly
Posts: 1430
Joined: Sun Jan 15, 2006 9:59 pm
Location: Oregon Territory

Re: Petition to remove silencers from NFA.

Post by Abiqua »

este wrote:I'd be happy with instant check and/OR a $5 tax. I'd settle for both with a reasonable wait even. Right now we're not getting any of that.
Can you imagine the wait with a $5 stamp and no other change to the process?
CATM93
Member
Posts: 16
Joined: Wed Aug 18, 2010 11:04 pm

Re: Petition to remove silencers from NFA.

Post by CATM93 »

Signed on. Maybe they will try to buy our votes by throwing us this bone. One can dream.
User avatar
ChimeraPrecision
Silent But Deadly
Posts: 622
Joined: Wed Sep 21, 2011 11:40 am
Location: Behind a Glock22

Re: Petition to remove silencers from NFA.

Post by ChimeraPrecision »

What really exacerbates me is if one wants to obtain an FEL federal explosives license the ATF MUST respond within 90days of receiving the paperwork. There should be requirement like that for NFA items
Keep calm, and suppress on
Kramer
Silent But Deadly
Posts: 1083
Joined: Sat Dec 20, 2008 3:13 pm
Location: nePA

Re: Petition to remove silencers from NFA.

Post by Kramer »

Abiqua wrote:Can you imagine the wait with a $5 stamp and no other change to the process?
Probably two to three years! :shock:
User avatar
Stu
Silent But Deadly
Posts: 4571
Joined: Mon Mar 03, 2008 2:11 am
Location: Wheat Ridge, CO
Contact:

Re: Petition to remove silencers from NFA.

Post by Stu »

I came in here to make sure this had been posted. Still nearly 4,000 signatures short? What is the deal?!

Also, seems to me, that people should be signing onto a class action lawsuit, instead of signing a stupid petition. Law was illegally passed. Should be turned over immediately.

Last, if just anyone can put up a petition, then who says that they'll consider changing the law if an arbitrary amount of signatures are met?
User avatar
ChimeraPrecision
Silent But Deadly
Posts: 622
Joined: Wed Sep 21, 2011 11:40 am
Location: Behind a Glock22

Re: Petition to remove silencers from NFA.

Post by ChimeraPrecision »

Bump,

This one expires on friday. Should i start one on saturday and give this another Go??
Keep calm, and suppress on
GSRswapandslow
Senior Silent Operator
Posts: 117
Joined: Tue Apr 06, 2010 2:56 pm
Location: Foothills of NC

Re: Petition to remove silencers from NFA.

Post by GSRswapandslow »

no, because it's a worthless endeavor in this manor
ScorpioMk
Member
Posts: 21
Joined: Sat Aug 29, 2009 10:10 pm
Location: Mill Creek

Re: Petition to remove silencers from NFA.

Post by ScorpioMk »

GSRswapandslow wrote:no, because it's a worthless endeavor in this manor
What's your idea, or anyone else idea on the correct way to go about it? I just purchased my first can this week and playing the waiting game now.
User avatar
crazy-mp
Silent Operator
Posts: 72
Joined: Fri Oct 21, 2011 10:26 pm

Re: Petition to remove silencers from NFA.

Post by crazy-mp »

First they came for the NFA items,
and I didn't speak out because I couldn't afford a machine gun.

Then they came for the High capacity magazines,
and I didn't speak out because I didn't own a Glock.

Then they came for the shotgun,
and I didn't speak out because I didn't shoot skeet.

Then they came for mine
and there were no guns left to protect me.


Anytime there is a chance gun laws can change for the better it is worth fighting for.
- - - Show Me Guns - - -
------Lebanon MO------
User avatar
doubloon
Silent But Deadly
Posts: 11897
Joined: Wed Dec 31, 2008 11:02 pm
Location: Houston-ish

Re: Petition to remove silencers from NFA.

Post by doubloon »

GSRswapandslow wrote:no, because it's a worthless endeavor in this manor
Agreed, it's almost as worthless as facebook
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BDtd2jNIwAU MUSAFAR!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8CrOL-ydFMI This is Water DavidW
Complete Form 1s http://www.silencertalk.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=10&t=79895
User avatar
redtazdog
Elite Member
Posts: 2432
Joined: Sat Jun 23, 2007 10:30 am
Contact:

Re: Petition to remove silencers from NFA.

Post by redtazdog »

I'm thinking that if the tax stamp was made too easy to get then we may see legal purchased cans
used in more crimes and soon after a ban could be pushed on them.
A $5 stamp would be great! but I hope it dousnt come back against us later :?
User avatar
redtazdog
Elite Member
Posts: 2432
Joined: Sat Jun 23, 2007 10:30 am
Contact:

Re: Petition to remove silencers from NFA.

Post by redtazdog »

Abiqua wrote:
este wrote:I'd be happy with instant check and/OR a $5 tax. I'd settle for both with a reasonable wait even. Right now we're not getting any of that.
Can you imagine the wait with a $5 stamp and no other change to the process?
If just the stamp changed to $5 I would send in 20 form 1's this week :lol:
Them my wife would be pissed because I'm in the shop all the time
User avatar
ChimeraPrecision
Silent But Deadly
Posts: 622
Joined: Wed Sep 21, 2011 11:40 am
Location: Behind a Glock22

Re: Petition to remove silencers from NFA.

Post by ChimeraPrecision »

I'll pay the 200 if the process took 2 weeks
Keep calm, and suppress on
User avatar
mpallett
Elite Industry Professional
Posts: 2876
Joined: Mon Apr 25, 2005 9:28 am
Location: MA
Contact:

Re: Petition to remove silencers from NFA.

Post by mpallett »

While I would love to see this happen, it can not be "just removed" from NFA. That would make them illegal in many states as the state laws say "unless registered". I like the $5 AOW route.
Over weight Telco guy with a FFL/07 for hire :)
User avatar
ChimeraPrecision
Silent But Deadly
Posts: 622
Joined: Wed Sep 21, 2011 11:40 am
Location: Behind a Glock22

Re: Petition to remove silencers from NFA.

Post by ChimeraPrecision »

mpallett wrote:While I would love to see this happen, it can not be "just removed" from NFA. That would make them illegal in many states as the state laws say "unless registered". I like the $5 AOW route.
I'm with you, suppressors have no reason to be deemed "firearms" aow makes sense, how does the paperwork pending time compare?
Keep calm, and suppress on
User avatar
Abiqua
Silent But Deadly
Posts: 1430
Joined: Sun Jan 15, 2006 9:59 pm
Location: Oregon Territory

Re: Petition to remove silencers from NFA.

Post by Abiqua »

ChimeraPrecision wrote:
mpallett wrote:While I would love to see this happen, it can not be "just removed" from NFA. That would make them illegal in many states as the state laws say "unless registered". I like the $5 AOW route.
I'm with you, suppressors have no reason to be deemed "firearms" aow makes sense, how does the paperwork pending time compare?
It shouldn't be any different, it's just a form going thru the same process.
ScorpioMk
Member
Posts: 21
Joined: Sat Aug 29, 2009 10:10 pm
Location: Mill Creek

Re: Petition to remove silencers from NFA.

Post by ScorpioMk »

If they added a "fast track" fee they would make more money, and stimulate the economy! I know a lot more of my friends would buy stuff if the wait wasn't so long.
User avatar
Armorer-at-Law
Silent But Deadly
Posts: 338
Joined: Wed Dec 31, 2008 12:39 pm
Location: Cincinnati, OH
Contact:

Re: Petition to remove silencers from NFA.

Post by Armorer-at-Law »

While I would love to see this happen, it can not be "just removed" from NFA. That would make them illegal in many states as the state laws say "unless registered".
There would be plenty of time to get the state laws amended to take care of that.
Send lawyers, guns, and money...
Armorer-at-Law.com
07FFL/02SOT
Historian
Silent But Deadly
Posts: 3503
Joined: Mon Mar 29, 2010 10:37 pm

Re: Petition to remove silencers from NFA.

Post by Historian »

redtazdog wrote:I'm thinking that if the tax stamp was made too easy to get then we may see legal purchased cans
used in more crimes and soon after a ban could be pushed on them.
A $5 stamp would be great! but I hope it dousnt come back against us later :?
The suppressor has been so demonized that the real culprit, the criminal misuse of firearms,
gets a pass by liberals if the criminal belongs to a protected class (e.g., Attorney General Holder
cancelled the prosecution of Black Panther intimidation at polling places.)

On cable the Gangster Bio Series featured the mob assassin Joe "Mad Dog" Sullivan who used
suppressors on Mac11s.

<< http://www.cbc.ca/fifth/2010-2011/thede ... livan.html>>

Southie's Whitey Bulger had an arsenal of suppressed weapons, with the full knowledge of
FBI SA John "ZIp" Connolly. [Zip =" Same Southie Zip code as Whitey's ].

Demystifying suppressors and their usage to the public, including to well meaning but inane folks at firearms range, will
put things in perspective.

Then BATF agents can be better spent tracking and prosecuting illegal transfers of weapons.
Perhaps they can start with rogue BATF supervisors. :)

Expect the smarmy and icky shivers from the press, such as the NY Times whose owner and editor
have a conceal carry from NY CIty. Who would have thunk?

First step in 1960's SF Manual was to control communications and then roads.
This translates to petitioning the cable programs on guns to show suppressors in
the correct light and educate the mind numbed population that suppressors
are PC, save hearing which in turn will reduce impact on the Health Care System.

As the first step in the recipe for Hungarian Chicken -- 1) Steal The Chicken! --
in the next crucial election Dump The Chump and his HOLDERovers. :)
keithinvestigations
Silent Operator
Posts: 50
Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2011 4:13 pm
Location: Mississippi
Contact:

Re: Petition to remove silencers from NFA.

Post by keithinvestigations »

This is the dumbest thing I think I have ever seen posted on this site.

Obama's staff is going to get a good laugh out of this. They may even read it at Obama's next party or when he is having a bad day. This is like petitioning the devil to let you have some water in hell.

Anyone who signed this, do you know who the hell Obama is? He is a radical socialist rigid ideologue of Bill Ayers, Jerimiah Wright ANTI F****** FREEDOM. Obama want's to TAKE these freedoms away not GIVE more to you. You are barking up the wrong tree brother.

Here are some more examples for you how just don't get it:

1) asking a policeman to let you rob a bank and drive you home
2) asking a doctor to kill your mother in law
3) trying to get a pig to fly

Someone help me out with more examples...
Davy Keith
keithinvestigations
Silent Operator
Posts: 50
Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2011 4:13 pm
Location: Mississippi
Contact:

Re: Petition to remove silencers from NFA.

Post by keithinvestigations »

ScorpioMk wrote:
GSRswapandslow wrote:no, because it's a worthless endeavor in this manor
What's your idea, or anyone else idea on the correct way to go about it? I just purchased my first can this week and playing the waiting game now.

My idea is to GET A NEW PRESIDENT
Davy Keith
psode27
Member
Posts: 14
Joined: Wed Apr 20, 2011 8:57 pm

Re: Petition to remove silencers from NFA.

Post by psode27 »

Signed and passed to friends and family!
keithinvestigations
Silent Operator
Posts: 50
Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2011 4:13 pm
Location: Mississippi
Contact:

Re: Petition to remove silencers from NFA.

Post by keithinvestigations »

psode27 wrote:Signed and passed to friends and family!
It's past the deadline....read it.
Davy Keith
User avatar
trey_phish83
Silent But Deadly
Posts: 1148
Joined: Wed Jan 24, 2007 12:18 am
Location: Newport, NH

Re: Petition to remove silencers from NFA.

Post by trey_phish83 »

did anyone notice throughout the month that the numbers would fluctuate? last week it was well about three thousand vote, this week its well below three thousand vote.
Crush your enemies, see them driven before you, and to hear the lamentation of their women.
User avatar
sha-ul
Senior Silent Operator
Posts: 147
Joined: Wed Apr 13, 2011 10:47 am

Re: Petition to remove silencers from NFA.

Post by sha-ul »

Abiqua wrote:
Kramer wrote:The Gov't is broke and does not want to lose the $200 stamp on 10k+ cans, plus they won't lose $195 by moving them to AOW status.
This.

I see instant checks as more appealing to the gov't, they'd still get their $200.
Maybe the tact that might be best is to work to make silencers available with an NCIC& a $200 excise tax AT THE POINT OF SALE. then work on reducing the 200 to say $5 down the road.
While in 1938 it might have taken 6 months to determine if you are a prohibited possessor, in 2011, with all the databases of criminals, there is no excuse for it.
Post Reply