NV question
Posted: Tue Feb 26, 2013 9:02 pm
What is the photoreciever on a NV monocular? My nv monocular says before moving lens cap,make sure the photoreciever is open. Not sure what it is or if it is open or closed. Need a little help.
Sound Suppressor Discussion
http://www.silencertalk.com/forum/
Ah, I miss the ol' PVS-14s. If I could justify the cost I would have one of my own, just can't make myself do it.Libertarian_Geek wrote:I have a couple of PVS14s and had a D740, but they don't have such a warning.
I looked up the user manual for yours and didn't notice it when skimming through. Maybe it's got a photocel for adjusting the gain and that's what it's calling the photoreciever.
https://www.armasight.com/night-vision/ ... v6_web.pdf
http://www.frankies4x4.com/L3PVS14.phptsands974 wrote:Ah, I miss the ol' PVS-14s. If I could justify the cost I would have one of my own, just can't make myself do it.Libertarian_Geek wrote:I have a couple of PVS14s and had a D740, but they don't have such a warning.
I looked up the user manual for yours and didn't notice it when skimming through. Maybe it's got a photocel for adjusting the gain and that's what it's calling the photoreciever.
https://www.armasight.com/night-vision/ ... v6_web.pdf
^ This (Also, it's possible to spend less than $3K on gen 3 if you shop around)JohnnyC wrote:Read the NV beginners guide either on ARFcom or Snipers Hide, then call Vic at TNVC. Gen 2 is passable IF you have extra IR illumination and are cool with shorter range and lower resolution. For many people it is perfectly adequate. However, Gen 3 is worth the cost, whether dedicated scope or PVS-14 w/IR laser. The distinction is real, as are the benefits of Gen 3, but it's definitely a step up in price.
I'm of the opinion that I'd rather spent $3k up front, than $500 here, realize I'm not happy, $1k on Gen 2, still be disappointed, then spend the $3k on Gen 3.
When I get back home from beantown I ll do a write up on it.I haven't even had the opportunity to turn it on yet.HandyMan wrote:cyclone, I have been looking at various night devices for weeks now. I have given a lot of thought to the Spark. Several online reviews stated that the manual had errors and that the newest .pdf is the most up to date copy of the manual.
I think they copy pasted some info for another model into the manual by mistake.
How do you like your Spark so far? I have been thinking about getting one to play with. All the reviews have been very positive.
I have dug up some of the specs on it, and it ranges into the low end of gen 2. For less than $500 shipped, it seems like a hell of a deal.
But, I would like to get some real world feedback on it. As far as night vision goes, it is pretty cheap. But, it is still $500.
This is true, many can be had for less, and I tend to buy tubes separately making them even less expensive. However, for turn-key solutions including necessary mounts and such I usually throw $3k out there as a general price. I've purchased excellent Omni-IV MX-10160 tubes for $500 before.Libertarian_Geek wrote:^ This (Also, it's possible to spend less than $3K on gen 3 if you shop around)JohnnyC wrote:Read the NV beginners guide either on ARFcom or Snipers Hide, then call Vic at TNVC. Gen 2 is passable IF you have extra IR illumination and are cool with shorter range and lower resolution. For many people it is perfectly adequate. However, Gen 3 is worth the cost, whether dedicated scope or PVS-14 w/IR laser. The distinction is real, as are the benefits of Gen 3, but it's definitely a step up in price.
I'm of the opinion that I'd rather spent $3k up front, than $500 here, realize I'm not happy, $1k on Gen 2, still be disappointed, then spend the $3k on Gen 3.
That's debatable.cyclone72 wrote:What would be a good compatible 1-4 optic to use with this? I'm getting an eotech for it aswell. Is eotech or aimpoint better with use of nv?