Assume everyone in the example are all legally allowed to possess a suppressor.
If one person has a "can" (I'm going to use that phrase going forward because I'm a lazy typer..), and it's a QD style.
The second person doesn't own a can, but would like to use the first persons can, of course always only in their presence, abiding by all laws/regulations, etc...
If the second person installs the necessary QD muzzle device on their firearm, would that constitute intent to transfer?
I keep arguing in circles in my head and need a breakout opinion please!
Thanks.
"Intent" question
Re: "Intent" question
The police have been notified and are on their way. Have fun in prison.
Nah youre fine. It shows intent to do something legal. No crime.
Nah youre fine. It shows intent to do something legal. No crime.
300 blackout form 1: http://www.silencertalk.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=10&t=137293
5.56 form 1:
http://www.silencertalk.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=10&t=141800&p=955647#p955647
5.56 form 1:
http://www.silencertalk.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=10&t=141800&p=955647#p955647
Re: "Intent" question
If all laws are being followed, what law are you breaking?rogue14 wrote: The second person doesn't own a can, but would like to use the first persons can, of course always only in their presence, abiding by all laws/regulations
Transfer of ownership does not take place in your scenario.
I don't care what your chart says
-
- Silent But Deadly
- Posts: 3851
- Joined: Tue Apr 27, 2010 12:52 pm
Re: "Intent" question
There are cans that mount straight to regular flash hiders, and a whole bunch that mount to threaded barrels. If your assumption was true, then almost every rifle out there would be illegal, or the owners could all be charged with intent. The only state I know of where a threaded barrel is illegal is California.rogue14 wrote: If the second person installs the necessary QD muzzle device on their firearm, would that constitute intent to transfer?
You're fine. So is your buddy.
The moments I was censored was the moment that I won. That's twice, now.Thanks jwbaker, et al, for my victories.
Re: "Intent" question
OK, thanks to all for the replies.
That all makes better sense than the nonsense circling the drain in my head!
That all makes better sense than the nonsense circling the drain in my head!
- T-Rex
- Silent But Deadly
- Posts: 1865
- Joined: Wed Oct 29, 2014 3:38 pm
- Location: CT - The AntiConstitution State
Re: "Intent" question
In CT, a threaded barrel on a pistol, Mfr'd after the 93 ban, would make it an Assault Weapon.poikilotrm wrote:rogue14 wrote:The only state I know of where a threaded barrel is illegal is California.
Completed Builds www.silencertalk.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=79895
Burst Calculator www.engineersedge.com/calculators/pipe_bust_calc.htm
Silencer Porn www.instagram.com/explore/tags/silencerporn/
Burst Calculator www.engineersedge.com/calculators/pipe_bust_calc.htm
Silencer Porn www.instagram.com/explore/tags/silencerporn/
Re: "Intent" question
T-Rex wrote:...
In CT, a threaded barrel on a pistol, Mfr'd after the 93 ban, would make it an Assault Weapon.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BDtd2jNIwAU MUSAFAR!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8CrOL-ydFMI This is Water DavidW
Complete Form 1s http://www.silencertalk.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=10&t=79895
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8CrOL-ydFMI This is Water DavidW
Complete Form 1s http://www.silencertalk.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=10&t=79895