AGAIN? For the forth time! And please don't try to tell me he is doing so accidently. What a total and complete moron! I'm leaning more and more toward impeaching the SOB, heck bite-me could do a better job than this fool. But if we tried to impeach him we would all be racist. Someone said today and I'm just paraphrasing here "that the republican party is the white mans party" or some such bull crap.
http://www.cnsnews.com/news/article/oba ... ir-creator
Obama Strips the 'Creator' from Declaration of Independence
Obama Strips the 'Creator' from Declaration of Independence
"The said constitution shall never be construed to authorize Congress to prevent the people of the United States who are peaceable citizens from keeping their own arms." Samuel Adams
Re: Obama Strips the 'Creator' from Declaration of Independe
Obama finally learns Declaration of Independence, includes 'Creator'
http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/opini ... 91438.html
I'd bet there are a whole bunch of people here in this is "not a christian nation" who have been giving this administration grief over his refusal to include "the Creator" when he uses part of the Declaration of Independence. Back in campaigning mode he knows if he wants the votes of libtarded Christians (and no, not a Christians are libtarded) he MUST include the creator in his renditions. But after the campaign is over, no mater who wins what, I bet the fool will revert back to his tired old socialistic atheist ways. Impeach him, he doesn't hold the presidency or the United States in high enough regard! The President needs to be a man and brave men bow to NO ONE!!!
http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/opini ... 91438.html
I'd bet there are a whole bunch of people here in this is "not a christian nation" who have been giving this administration grief over his refusal to include "the Creator" when he uses part of the Declaration of Independence. Back in campaigning mode he knows if he wants the votes of libtarded Christians (and no, not a Christians are libtarded) he MUST include the creator in his renditions. But after the campaign is over, no mater who wins what, I bet the fool will revert back to his tired old socialistic atheist ways. Impeach him, he doesn't hold the presidency or the United States in high enough regard! The President needs to be a man and brave men bow to NO ONE!!!
"The said constitution shall never be construed to authorize Congress to prevent the people of the United States who are peaceable citizens from keeping their own arms." Samuel Adams
Understanding Obama’s Fear Of The Creator
Understanding Obama’s Fear Of The Creator
For the third time, Obama has elected to redact “endowed by their Creator” from a recitation of the text of the Declaration of Independence. No longer a possible fluke, this omission is now a clear pattern. What does it mean?
The reason Obama refuses to say that rights are endowed by our Creator does not come from any religious animosity. The statement itself, after all, was religiously ambiguous. Rather, the point of the phrase is to acknowledge that true rights come from our status as human beings, and thus precede the existence of government. This was necessary to explain why the King of Britain was an oppressor and the colonists were justified to rebel. Statists resist this view, because such rights then serve as a limit on the power of government.
Obama believes that the state is the originator of all “rights.” He believes that it’s perfectly valid for him to get together with Nancy Pelosi and Harry Reid and declare that free health care is a “right.” But rights don’t work that way. The danger of this statist view is that, what the state giveth, it can taketh away. A state that can create “rights” out of thin air can erase them just as easily. Think you have a right to self defense? Not if Obama and the gun haters get their way. Think you have a right to your property? Not when the redistributionists decide that it’s unfair for you to have more while others have less. This is why Obama refuses to acknowledge the origins of our rights, and why his deliberate ignorance is so dangerous.
BRIAN GARST
http://conservative-compendium.com/word ... e-creator/
For the third time, Obama has elected to redact “endowed by their Creator” from a recitation of the text of the Declaration of Independence. No longer a possible fluke, this omission is now a clear pattern. What does it mean?
The reason Obama refuses to say that rights are endowed by our Creator does not come from any religious animosity. The statement itself, after all, was religiously ambiguous. Rather, the point of the phrase is to acknowledge that true rights come from our status as human beings, and thus precede the existence of government. This was necessary to explain why the King of Britain was an oppressor and the colonists were justified to rebel. Statists resist this view, because such rights then serve as a limit on the power of government.
Obama believes that the state is the originator of all “rights.” He believes that it’s perfectly valid for him to get together with Nancy Pelosi and Harry Reid and declare that free health care is a “right.” But rights don’t work that way. The danger of this statist view is that, what the state giveth, it can taketh away. A state that can create “rights” out of thin air can erase them just as easily. Think you have a right to self defense? Not if Obama and the gun haters get their way. Think you have a right to your property? Not when the redistributionists decide that it’s unfair for you to have more while others have less. This is why Obama refuses to acknowledge the origins of our rights, and why his deliberate ignorance is so dangerous.
BRIAN GARST
http://conservative-compendium.com/word ... e-creator/
"The said constitution shall never be construed to authorize Congress to prevent the people of the United States who are peaceable citizens from keeping their own arms." Samuel Adams
Re: Understanding Obama’s Fear Of The Creator
It means he's a Buddhist.zeezee wrote:... a clear pattern. What does it mean? ...
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BDtd2jNIwAU MUSAFAR!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8CrOL-ydFMI This is Water DavidW
Complete Form 1s http://www.silencertalk.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=10&t=79895
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8CrOL-ydFMI This is Water DavidW
Complete Form 1s http://www.silencertalk.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=10&t=79895
Re: Obama Strips the 'Creator' from Declaration of Independe
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BDtd2jNIwAU MUSAFAR!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8CrOL-ydFMI This is Water DavidW
Complete Form 1s http://www.silencertalk.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=10&t=79895
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8CrOL-ydFMI This is Water DavidW
Complete Form 1s http://www.silencertalk.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=10&t=79895
Re: Obama Strips the 'Creator' from Declaration of Independe
If you go to the random forum you will see a post in which he got the message and putting the creator back in where he belongs, his poll ratings were really going down in the septic tank level.
Here we go I found it!
President Obama Restores ‘Creator’ to Declaration of Independence
Was the return to the original text a result of recent, bad publicity?
http://www.breitbart.tv/president-obama ... ependence/
Here we go I found it!
President Obama Restores ‘Creator’ to Declaration of Independence
Was the return to the original text a result of recent, bad publicity?
http://www.breitbart.tv/president-obama ... ependence/
Demand stringent background and mental health checks on your politicians.
Re: Obama Strips the 'Creator' from Declaration of Independe
Fade to interview with the president.Hush wrote:If you go to the random forum you will see a post in which he got the message and putting the creator back in where he belongs, his poll ratings were really going down in the septic tank level.
Here we go I found it!
President Obama Restores ‘Creator’ to Declaration of Independence
Was the return to the original text a result of recent, bad publicity?
http://www.breitbart.tv/president-obama ... ependence/
Mr. President you left out the words "their Creator".
Um, um, um, I did? Yes. Well, well, um, um, I read my, my teleprompter exactly as michele wrote it, so I'm sure you're wrong.
Fade to campaign mode . . . . . . . . .
Mr. President you accurately quoted the D of I after missing the words "their Creator" on the last 4 speeches, can you explain that sir?
I um, ahh, ummm (look of confusion or maybe stupefaction on face) don't know what you are talking about? I um, um, go to church. I ahhh, um, um, um am a Christian and, and, and you must me mistaken.
Ladies and gentlemen that was our president and great orator, um um mr barry . . . . What's his real last name, I forgot? Back to you Chet in the studio.
"The said constitution shall never be construed to authorize Congress to prevent the people of the United States who are peaceable citizens from keeping their own arms." Samuel Adams
Re: Obama Strips the 'Creator' from Declaration of Independe
Thy that search with "why are atheists".doubloon wrote:
"I'm not afraid of dying. I's HOW I die that I'm concerned about." - Crosshair
"Beware the man with one gun. He probably doesn't know how to use it."
"Beware the man with one gun. He probably doesn't know how to use it."
- montanabound
- Silent But Deadly
- Posts: 304
- Joined: Sun May 14, 2006 7:23 pm
- Location: NC,VA,WVA,MD
Re: Obama Strips the 'Creator' from Declaration of Independe
Not only by his omission of "Creator" from the DOI but the use of "inalienable rights" as opposed to the correct "unalienale rights" changes the intent of the meaning of the word "Creator" from God,Supreme being or whatever the Founding Fathers intended, to "Creator" meaning the Govt.
In a nutshell : unalienable = Born with, God given, for example your eye,skin color
inalienable = Given by Govt., for ex. Drivers License, Marriage License
In a nutshell : unalienable = Born with, God given, for example your eye,skin color
inalienable = Given by Govt., for ex. Drivers License, Marriage License
Re: Obama Strips the 'Creator' from Declaration of Independe
It should say:
Why are atheists so right
"I regard virginity as a correctible perversity of no interest" - Lazarus Long (Time Enough for Love), Robert A. Heinlein