Stainless tubing question....

Yes, it can be legal to make a silencer. For everything Form-1, from silencer designs that are easily made, to filing forms with the BATF, to 3D modeling. Remember, you must have an approved BATF Form-1 to make a silencer. All NFA laws apply.

Moderators: mpallett, bakerjw

Post Reply
rqlasl
Silent But Deadly
Posts: 184
Joined: Sat May 30, 2009 8:20 pm
Location: lititz, PA.

Stainless tubing question....

Post by rqlasl »

I am getting ready to do my next form 1 can and have a question.
I am going to make the can for primarily my Sar-1 in 7.62x39 but I also want to put it on my 30.06.
So here is the question......1.750 diameter .060 wall 304 seamless tubing. Can it take the pressure from the 30.06?
Thank you for any advice.
User avatar
Bendersquint
Industry Professional
Posts: 11357
Joined: Sat Jan 07, 2006 7:19 pm
Location: North Carolina
Contact:

Re: Stainless tubing question....

Post by Bendersquint »

I would say its fine, I like to use .065 wall but wouldn't hesitate for a bolt gun with those specs.

-B
User avatar
ghostdog662
Silent But Deadly
Posts: 655
Joined: Thu Mar 06, 2008 3:19 pm
Location: TX

Re: Stainless tubing question....

Post by ghostdog662 »

Sounds good as long as the length is sufficient.
LP
User avatar
jimmym40a2
Elite Member
Posts: 2745
Joined: Sun May 06, 2007 8:25 pm
Location: Colorado (for Mongo)

Re: Stainless tubing question....

Post by jimmym40a2 »

I used .o65 on my 50bmg can. (I have thick spacers to help with the pressure) and it is fine.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nEZJ_C4LwzA
SRM
Silent But Deadly
Posts: 1825
Joined: Mon Mar 15, 2010 7:20 pm
Location: wyoming

Re: Stainless tubing question....

Post by SRM »

If you have any doubt about the seamless part, make it from solid and you will know there`s no seam!
rqlasl
Silent But Deadly
Posts: 184
Joined: Sat May 30, 2009 8:20 pm
Location: lititz, PA.

Re: Stainless tubing question....

Post by rqlasl »

I wasnt worried about the seamless....I just figured I'd mention it....But its always good to look at all possibilities.
The overall lenght is going to be about 11 inches with about 4 inches over the barrel.
My 1st can was a monolithic style so I never thought about spacers....
It would totally suck having to bore out a piece of 1.750 diameter x 11' 304 ss on my 6 inch atlas!!
I'm leaning towards a stepped cone design...Any suggestions on spacing?
User avatar
Bendersquint
Industry Professional
Posts: 11357
Joined: Sat Jan 07, 2006 7:19 pm
Location: North Carolina
Contact:

Re: Stainless tubing question....

Post by Bendersquint »

rqlasl wrote:I wasnt worried about the seamless....I just figured I'd mention it....But its always good to look at all possibilities.
The overall lenght is going to be about 11 inches with about 4 inches over the barrel.
My 1st can was a monolithic style so I never thought about spacers....
It would totally suck having to bore out a piece of 1.750 diameter x 11' 304 ss on my 6 inch atlas!!
I'm leaning towards a stepped cone design...Any suggestions on spacing?
Why not use seamless tubing for spacers? Do it all the time... Just turn it a little thinner to have a perfect fit for the ID of your tube.

-B
rqlasl
Silent But Deadly
Posts: 184
Joined: Sat May 30, 2009 8:20 pm
Location: lititz, PA.

Re: Stainless tubing question....

Post by rqlasl »

The more I think about it I might just do stepped cones and spacers, and weld the whole thing together. I've always been a fan of over engineering everything I make.
User avatar
Bendersquint
Industry Professional
Posts: 11357
Joined: Sat Jan 07, 2006 7:19 pm
Location: North Carolina
Contact:

Re: Stainless tubing question....

Post by Bendersquint »

rqlasl wrote:The more I think about it I might just do stepped cones and spacers, and weld the whole thing together. I've always been a fan of over engineering everything I make.
Nothing wrong with some over-engineering, better safe than sorry, right?

-B
rqlasl
Silent But Deadly
Posts: 184
Joined: Sat May 30, 2009 8:20 pm
Location: lititz, PA.

Re: Stainless tubing question....

Post by rqlasl »

:wink: That Sir, is a fact!
User avatar
PaulNoiseLess
Silent But Deadly
Posts: 1249
Joined: Sun Dec 06, 2009 10:02 am
Location: Australia
Contact:

Re: Stainless tubing question....

Post by PaulNoiseLess »

:shock: :shock: :shock:
The future is not waiting for us, it is waiting within us ...
SRM
Silent But Deadly
Posts: 1825
Joined: Mon Mar 15, 2010 7:20 pm
Location: wyoming

Re: Stainless tubing question....

Post by SRM »

PaulNoiseLess wrote::shock: :shock: :shock:
we cant do a redo
User avatar
Bowen1911
Silent But Deadly
Posts: 1644
Joined: Mon Jan 25, 2010 3:31 pm
Location: Idaho

Re: Stainless tubing question....

Post by Bowen1911 »

Bendersquint wrote:
rqlasl wrote:The more I think about it I might just do stepped cones and spacers, and weld the whole thing together. I've always been a fan of over engineering everything I make.
Nothing wrong with some over-engineering, better safe than sorry, right?

-B

but then you won't have any silencer eruption photo's to add to the collection
"I notice that everybody that is pro-abortion already has been born."
--Ronald Reagan

Form 1 .22 can
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mq-XG3tn7s0
User avatar
Bendersquint
Industry Professional
Posts: 11357
Joined: Sat Jan 07, 2006 7:19 pm
Location: North Carolina
Contact:

Re: Stainless tubing question....

Post by Bendersquint »

Bowen1911 wrote:
Bendersquint wrote:
rqlasl wrote:The more I think about it I might just do stepped cones and spacers, and weld the whole thing together. I've always been a fan of over engineering everything I make.
Nothing wrong with some over-engineering, better safe than sorry, right?

-B

but then you won't have any silencer eruption photo's to add to the collection
That is true but most Form1 kabooms don't make it online due to embarassment, but people proudly show off when a manufacturers can blows! :roll:

With that in mind I change my mind and say that .035 will be plenty thick for a short barrel 30.06 ;) (just kidding)

-B
rqlasl
Silent But Deadly
Posts: 184
Joined: Sat May 30, 2009 8:20 pm
Location: lititz, PA.

Re: Stainless tubing question....

Post by rqlasl »

Nice!....But until they strart making tubes from rolled and fusion welded .010 animantium shim stock.....I'll err on the side caution! :D
User avatar
Bendersquint
Industry Professional
Posts: 11357
Joined: Sat Jan 07, 2006 7:19 pm
Location: North Carolina
Contact:

Re: Stainless tubing question....

Post by Bendersquint »

rqlasl wrote:Nice!....But until they strart making tubes from rolled and fusion welded .010 animantium shim stock.....I'll err on the side caution! :D
I have seen a 22lr tube that was .030 thick, was threaded I believe 48tpi on the endcaps!

-B
User avatar
Bowen1911
Silent But Deadly
Posts: 1644
Joined: Mon Jan 25, 2010 3:31 pm
Location: Idaho

Re: Stainless tubing question....

Post by Bowen1911 »

aren't the kodiak and essence tubes super thin?

with the pressures a 22 LR sees, stainless shouldn't need to be that thick at all.
"I notice that everybody that is pro-abortion already has been born."
--Ronald Reagan

Form 1 .22 can
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mq-XG3tn7s0
rqlasl
Silent But Deadly
Posts: 184
Joined: Sat May 30, 2009 8:20 pm
Location: lititz, PA.

Re: Stainless tubing question....

Post by rqlasl »

48tpi is a mighty fine thread......sounds like a crossthread waiting to happen if your not careful.....I picked up the tube for the spacers today 1.750 od 304 ss....So they're will be a combined wall of .120 with the spacers and can wall...better safe than a celebrity for blowing up a can! :D
User avatar
PaulNoiseLess
Silent But Deadly
Posts: 1249
Joined: Sun Dec 06, 2009 10:02 am
Location: Australia
Contact:

Re: Stainless tubing question....

Post by PaulNoiseLess »

Hi,

SRM: That’s why 0.065 is for you: No need for redoing (kidding as usual) ! :shock:

I also like what jimmym40a2 says: Use spacers thickness to give some help. For those very large Calibers. :wink:

Or (for very large Calibers) start on 1/8 and remove s--t where it’s not needed (CFD helps a lot on that). :wink:

Best,

Paul
The future is not waiting for us, it is waiting within us ...
User avatar
Bendersquint
Industry Professional
Posts: 11357
Joined: Sat Jan 07, 2006 7:19 pm
Location: North Carolina
Contact:

Re: Stainless tubing question....

Post by Bendersquint »

rqlasl wrote:48tpi is a mighty fine thread......sounds like a crossthread waiting to happen if your not careful.....I picked up the tube for the spacers today 1.750 od 304 ss....So they're will be a combined wall of .120 with the spacers and can wall...better safe than a celebrity for blowing up a can! :D
Maybe it was 42, there was so many hreads on it that it felt almost smooth!

Was NOT a take apart can till I got done with it, ended up sealing it back up because ownever was scared to screw up the threading on it!

-B
Post Reply