No porn, tasteful artistic images ok. If a European country would allow it on broadcast television, it is ok to post here. We do not warrent the content will meet anyone's standards. I may delete negative comments about photos.
rsilvers wrote:Why would you want it removed? I would want it removed if it was stuff taken in private, but these are on public streets. That makes it newsworthy and helps makes SF look further messed up in the eyes of reasonable people.
He's saying that since I called him out for posting a link to beastiality, since it is against the forum rules, that I should call Robert out for posting a link to explicit gay sex. In that regard, I have to say he is correct. Then again Robert owns the place so no one's making him do anything.
rsilvers wrote:Why would you want it removed? I would want it removed if it was stuff taken in private, but these are on public streets. That makes it newsworthy and helps makes SF look further messed up in the eyes of reasonable people.
He's saying that since I called him out for posting a link to beastiality, since it is against the forum rules, that I should call Robert out for posting a link to explicit homosexual sex. In that regard, I have to say he is correct. Then again Robert owns the place so no one's making him do anything.
Fine,we're all squared away. That was the point I was making.
Arevalo, they were some bloopers I happened to run across and I'm not sure were the link came from, check the properties on photo in the "Ho in training" post or the "Hot twats and other shots" post, I forget which one and go to their home page and you should find the link.
At the time I said the post was sick and it was, I gave fair warning.
Demand stringent background and mental health checks on your politicians.
I am confused. Did I delete a post because it had bestiality in it? I don't remember that. If I did, I think this is still different as it is a news-worthy public event and not porn shot in private.
No, no, nothing is your fault, I slipped the other day and put up some bloopers that were advertised as such and it was of girls making a porno with horses, one got slapped in the head with horse dick, another fell off a horse or something, crazy stuff, no penetration.
I had warned it was sick, funny too, but still sick and some ignored the sick warning and called me on it so I removed it after someone made a real big fuss, but he ignored your photos and I called him on it. Its all good now.
While they (the photos) do nothing for me your photos helped make your point and mine. So its all good.
Demand stringent background and mental health checks on your politicians.
Silvers? What the F--k? I thou... what the F--k? Damnit, warn people when you're gonna post faggot s--t. Some people have gag reflexes and food in their stomaches.
Twinsen wrote:Silvers? What the F--k? I thou... what the F--k? Damnit, warn people when you're gonna post faggot s--t. Some people have gag reflexes and food in their stomaches.
ROFLMAO
"Boi, you're in one hell of a situation. You're on US soil with illegal firearms." - Quote from US customs officer when he opened my suitcase and saw numerous NFA items
hipwr223 wrote:The cop's holster looks like an el cheapo uncle mikes with no real retention devices. No real law enforcement is going to carry a rig like that.
If you have an empty stomach, and a gag reflex a might stouter than Twinsen's, down in the text of that site it reveals that the cigar smoking "cop" is dressed in a "fetish costume". Apparently, LE costumes are popular there and not subject to arrest for "impersonating an officer". Indecent exposure is obviously also permitted within the confines of the event. The real cops stay on the edges of the event.......most likely to minimize their exposure to "bodily fluids".
BTW, it also said the dude in the hardhat was a "toilet boy"........that ain't beer he's drinking........at least not "virgin beer".
Save that link........it'll be good ammo when you get into a discussion with those who say "it's just an alternative lifestyle."
"My choice early in life was either to be a piano-player in a whorehouse or a politician. And to tell the truth, there's hardly any difference.
Harry S. Truman
Your tax dollars at work. How? I couldn't care less what people do in private, and I have been to San Fran sicko and see the gay pride parades. It doesn't even bother me when they rent cranes and cherry pickers so they can hang in the air and jerk off over the local churches.
But if you participate in this kind of activity don't act all shocked when you contract a disease. Then demand the Government pay for your health care.
I have a friend who like myself is a wounded Veteran, he is disabled I am not. He has crushed nerves and a pulverised spinal column. He needs a lot of medication to keep alive. It is about $200 a day.
Aids patients at the local hospital cost between $200 and $3000 a day, yes $3k a day, for care and meds.
So when we all pay these BS taxes for a new silencer or sbs, realize that some of it is going to support these people who do it to themselves.
Just to add, my friends pain meds were cut off once by a civilian POS Doctor. I had to watch him lose 70 pounds from just not being able to deal with the pain. He gets evaluated every six months as if his condition will improve. He lives in fear of someone cutting him off again.
Aids/HIV patients are not evaluated after the first time, they do not need to worry about their meds.
Trust me, I lived in Frisco for a while, you DON"T want to see the lesbians they have there. If you do just picture your Drill Instructor in drag, thats what they all look like. There are very few lipstick lesbians out there.
On retrospect, I guess this thread could have been called "San Francisco Silencers" it looks kind of hard to make noise with one of those down your throat
Hush wrote:Hello to the following:
Withoutremorse42
Huh? speak up, can't hear you.
Hello back! Hadn't seen this thread yet.
Conqueror wrote:
He's saying that since I called him out for posting a link to beastiality, since it is against the forum rules, that I should call Robert out for posting a link to explicit homosexual sex. In that regard, I have to say he is correct. Then again Robert owns the place so no one's making him do anything.
This about covers it. Then again, having gone back and read the contested thread I think I was a bit grumpy that day. Funny enough it wasn't the beastiality that got my hackles kicking, it was the deaf chick. My mom is deaf and I'm pretty fiercely defensive of her.
The blowing of a horse is gross, sure, but you just haven't lived until you've gagged after having seen inter-species erotica at least once, right?