Since starting the process for my 1st suppressor I've been totally bitten by the "quiet bug"... this morning I submitted my fingerprints using SilencerShop.com Kiost at my local dealer and the paperwork is on it's way to be processed (as soon as the SS.com receives the actual can/serial number, I ordered the Dead Air Mask as my first .22 silencer but it's on backorder with 4-6 week delay).
Putting the economics of it aside and the fact I'm eating through my retirement savings (I realize that integrally suppressed barrel is married to the gun) what are the pros and cons of integrally suppressed barrels?
I'm thinking about getting the TacSol Pac-Lite IV TSS Integrally Suppressed Barrel Upgrade for my Ruger Mark IV Tactical: https://www.silencershop.com/tacsol-pac ... grade.html since that is the only option available in the store plus the reviews are very good; it also has internal baffles instead of a mono-core (which from what I understand can significantly improve the first round pop).
But I can't quite decide on the dedicated barrel for a Ruger 10/22, I have 3 options:
1) TacSol X-Ring: https://www.silencershop.com/tacsol-x-r ... black.html
2) Gemtech Mist: https://www.silencershop.com/gemtech-in ... essor.html
3) YHM: https://www.silencershop.com/yhm-integr ... arrel.html
I'm leaning toward #1 due to baffles vs mono-core (the prices are all within $50 so that's not an issue), but is it true baffles make first round pop quieter? or does it not matter on a rifle as much due to longer powder burn time in a longer barrel?
What else do you guys have to say about integrally suppressed vs screw on cans?
Integrally Suppressed vs Detachable Can
Moderators: mpallett, mr fixit, bakerjw, renegade
- ArmedPolak
- New Member
- Posts: 1
- Joined: Sun Apr 12, 2020 11:12 am
- Contact:
Re: Integrally Suppressed vs Detachable Can
Integrals are cool but I wouldn't recommend it until you have a few other cans to cover your rifle, pistol and rimfire needs. Once you have those bases covered I say go nuts I have a couple integral 300 blackouts and they are nice plus I'm waiting on a Sico maxim 9 might get a second one of those if it turds out to be decent. As far as the integral 10/22 my brother has a Mist and its nice.
Re: Integrally Suppressed vs Detachable Can
Most integral silencers can be removed
300 blackout form 1: http://www.silencertalk.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=10&t=137293
5.56 form 1:
http://www.silencertalk.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=10&t=141800&p=955647#p955647
5.56 form 1:
http://www.silencertalk.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=10&t=141800&p=955647#p955647
Re: Integrally Suppressed vs Detachable Can
Most integral silencers simply unscrew and arent permanently attached.
300 blackout form 1: http://www.silencertalk.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=10&t=137293
5.56 form 1:
http://www.silencertalk.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=10&t=141800&p=955647#p955647
5.56 form 1:
http://www.silencertalk.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=10&t=141800&p=955647#p955647
Re: Integrally Suppressed vs Detachable Can
Re: Integrally Suppressed vs Detachable Can
MP5SD begs to differ
300 blackout form 1: http://www.silencertalk.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=10&t=137293
5.56 form 1:
http://www.silencertalk.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=10&t=141800&p=955647#p955647
5.56 form 1:
http://www.silencertalk.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=10&t=141800&p=955647#p955647
Re: Integrally Suppressed vs Detachable Can
Yeah most integrals the tube and baffles can be removed. The break being that you can't just unscrew it and use it on another gun.
If I could have integrals on all my guns I'd do it.
If I could have integrals on all my guns I'd do it.
Putting the laughter in manslaughter
Re: Integrally Suppressed vs Detachable Can
That is true. I was more going on what the op was asking about which would be 1 stamp guns.